IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i21p9515-d1511930.html

The Factors Influencing the Recycling of Plastic and Composite Packaging Waste

Author

Listed:
  • Artūras Torkelis

    (Institute of Environmental Engineering, Kaunas University of Technology, 44249 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Jolanta Dvarionienė

    (Institute of Environmental Engineering, Kaunas University of Technology, 44249 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Gintaras Denafas

    (Department of Environmental Technology, Faculty of Chemical Technology, Kaunas University of Technology, 44249 Kaunas, Lithuania)

Abstract

Packaging constitutes the largest end-use market for plastics, accounting for approximately 40% of total consumption by sector. In 2021, the average plastic packaging waste generated per European Union (EU) resident was 35.9 kg, of which 14.2 kg, or around 40%, was recycled. The Directive on Packaging and Packaging Waste (94/62/EC), a pivotal environmental regulation, mandates specific recycling targets: a minimum of 50% of all plastic packaging waste must be recycled by 2025, increasing to at least 55% by 2030. These targets underscore the necessity for further advancements in the plastic and composite packaging waste sector. This review uses a PESTEL analysis to provide a comprehensive overview of six critical factors influencing the recycling of plastic and composite packaging waste. The PESTEL framework encompasses political, economic, socio-cultural (social), technological, environmental, and legal dimensions. This review underscores the key aspects of each factor that influences recycling. Moreover, the discussion outlines the key deficiencies within the recycling system for plastic and composite packaging waste, including factors such as inadequate technological capacity, the underdevelopment of the secondary polymer market, and the establishment of ambitious political targets that are challenging to attain, among others. The questions raised underscore areas that warrant further investigation.

Suggested Citation

  • Artūras Torkelis & Jolanta Dvarionienė & Gintaras Denafas, 2024. "The Factors Influencing the Recycling of Plastic and Composite Packaging Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-30, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:21:p:9515-:d:1511930
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/21/9515/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/21/9515/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. ALBIZZATI Paola & ANTONOPOULOS Ioannis & CARO Dario & CRISTOBAL GARCIA Jorge & EGLE Lukas & GAUDILLAT Pierre & MANFREDI Simone & MARSCHINSKI Robert & MARTINEZ TUREGANO David & PIERRI Erika & SAVEYN Ha, 2023. "Development of an EU harmonised model for separate municipal waste collection and related policy support : literature review," JRC Research Reports JRC130419, Joint Research Centre.
    2. Ali Turkyilmaz & Mert Guney & Ferhat Karaca & Zhanar Bagdatkyzy & Aiganym Sandybayeva & Gulzat Sirenova, 2019. "A Comprehensive Construction and Demolition Waste Management Model using PESTEL and 3R for Construction Companies Operating in Central Asia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, March.
    3. Alice Mah, 2021. "Future-Proofing Capitalism: The Paradox of the Circular Economy for Plastics," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 21(2), pages 121-142, Spring.
    4. Katarzyna Bernat, 2023. "Post-Consumer Plastic Waste Management: From Collection and Sortation to Mechanical Recycling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-14, April.
    5. da Cruz, Nuno F. & Ferreira, Sandra & Cabral, Marta & Simões, Pedro & Marques, Rui Cunha, 2014. "Packaging waste recycling in Europe: is the industry paying for it?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 59755, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Vidas Lekavičius & Viktorija Bobinaitė & Rimantė Balsiūnaitė & Daina Kliaugaitė & Kristina Rimkūnaitė & Jovita Vasauskaitė, 2023. "Socioeconomic Impacts of Sustainability Practices in the Production and Use of Carrier Bags," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-22, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Minoo Tehrani & Yu Cui, 2025. "Governance and Innovation in Plastic Waste Management: The Case of Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Pavlo Lyshtva & Artūras Torkelis & Yaroslav Kobets & Estefania Carpio-Vallejo & Andrea Dobri & Jelena Barbir & Viktoria Voronova & Gintaras Denafas & Linas Kliucininkas, 2025. "Characterization of the Municipal Plastic and Multilayer Packaging Waste in Three Cities of the Baltic States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-19, January.
    3. Simon MoonGeun Jung, 2025. "Recent Progress in Sustainable Recycling of Waste Acrylonitrile–Butadiene–Styrene (ABS) Plastics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-24, September.
    4. Fotios Misopoulos & Priyanka Bajiraj, 2025. "Shared Producer Responsibility for Sustainable Packaging in FMCG: The Convergence of SDGs, ESG Reporting, and Stakeholder Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-46, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sahra Svensson-Hoglund & Jennifer D. Russell & Jessika Luth Richter & Paul Dewick & Leonidas Milios & Martin Calisto Friant & Anne P. M. Velenturf & Marianna Lena Kambanou & Rich Grousset & Sandra Gol, 2026. "Advancing Our Understanding of CE Loop Strategies: A Synthesizing Framework for Durable Consumer Products," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 1-33, April.
    2. Sonia Chien-i Chen & Xin Dang & Qian-qian Xu & Chung-Ming Own, 2024. "Transforming Waste into Value: Sustainable Recycling of Agricultural Resources Under the ‘Carbon Peak and Carbon Neutrality’ Vision," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-21, December.
    3. Gradus, Raymond H.J.M. & Nillesen, Paul H.L. & Dijkgraaf, Elbert & van Koppen, Rick J., 2017. "A Cost-effectiveness Analysis for Incineration or Recycling of Dutch Household Plastic Waste," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 22-28.
    4. Cao, Jian & Lu, Bo & Chen, Yangyang & Zhang, Xuemei & Zhai, Guangshu & Zhou, Gengui & Jiang, Boxin & Schnoor, Jerald L., 2016. "Extended producer responsibility system in China improves e-waste recycling: Government policies, enterprise, and public awareness," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 882-894.
    5. Gonzalo Wandosell & María C. Parra-Meroño & Alfredo Alcayde & Raúl Baños, 2021. "Green Packaging from Consumer and Business Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, January.
    6. Foster Gillian & Cristobal Garcia Jorge & Gallo Federico & Gaudillat Pierre & Marschinski Robert & Tonini Davide, 2025. "Policy measures to promote reuse and high-quality recycling of construction and demolition waste," JRC Research Reports JRC143206, Joint Research Centre.
    7. Konstantin Sommer, 2024. "The Chinese waste import ban and the emergence of waste havens within Europe," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 24-053/VI, Tinbergen Institute.
    8. Edyta Sidorczuk-Pietraszko & Wojciech Piontek & Anna Larsson, 2025. "Are Deposit–Return Schemes an Optimal Solution for Beverage Container Collection in the European Union? An Evidence Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-23, September.
    9. N. O. Kapustin, 2025. "Prospects for the Development of Plastic Recycling Industry in Russia," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 347-357, June.
    10. Sisi Wu & Xuan Gong & Yunfei Wang & Jian Cao, 2022. "Consumer Cognition and Management Perspective on Express Packaging Pollution," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-23, April.
    11. Verena Radulovic, 2018. "Portrayals in Print: Media Depictions of the Informal Sector’s Involvement in Managing E-Waste in India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-29, March.
    12. Gaetano Musella & Massimiliano Agovino & Mariaconcetta Casaccia & Alessandro Crociata, 2019. "Evaluating waste collection management: the case of macro-areas and municipalities in Italy," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 21(6), pages 2857-2889, December.
    13. Lu Xiao & Rongrong Fan & Chaojie Wang & Jun Wang, 2020. "Policy Analyses on Promoting the Recycling of Express Packages," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-12, November.
    14. Marques, Rui Cunha & da Cruz, Nuno Ferreira & Simões, Pedro & Faria Ferreira, Sandra & Pereira, Marta Cabral & De Jaeger, Simon, 2014. "Economic viability of packaging waste recycling systems: A comparison between Belgium and Portugal," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 22-33.
    15. Jakob T. Pruess, 2023. "Unraveling the complexity of extended producer responsibility policy mix design, implementation, and transfer dynamics in the European Union," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(6), pages 1500-1520, December.
    16. Salih Çevikarslan & Carsten Gelhard & Jörg Henseler, 2022. "Improving the Material and Financial Circularity of the Plastic Packaging Value Chain in The Netherlands: Challenges, Opportunities, and Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-23, June.
    17. Škamlová Lucia & Klobučník Michal, 2021. "Recycling of municipal waste in Slovak cities," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 53(53), pages 43-54, September.
    18. Bin Dong & Yuchen Wang & Bo Chen & Ruijun Zhang & Shengzhong Zhang, 2025. "Sustainable Development of Industry-Specific Universities in China Under the “Double First-Class” Initiative: A Niche Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-35, June.
    19. Yanjie Li & Guanfeng Yan, 2025. "The Heterogeneity in the Relationships Between Psychological Drivers and Construction and Demolition Waste Management Intention and Behaviors Among Tunnel Construction Managers: Insights from Personality Profiles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-24, March.
    20. Hervé Corvellec & Alison F. Stowell & Nils Johansson, 2022. "Critiques of the circular economy," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(2), pages 421-432, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:21:p:9515-:d:1511930. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.