IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i19p8791-d1762027.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are Deposit–Return Schemes an Optimal Solution for Beverage Container Collection in the European Union? An Evidence Review

Author

Listed:
  • Edyta Sidorczuk-Pietraszko

    (Faculty of Economics and Finance, University of Bialystok, 15-328 Białystok, Poland)

  • Wojciech Piontek

    (Faculty of Management, AGH University of Krakow, 30-059 Kraków, Poland)

  • Anna Larsson

    (Reloop Platform, 1040 Brussels, Belgium)

Abstract

The insufficient effectiveness of the European packaging waste policy has prompted the European Union to adopt more decisive measures in 2025. The Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation of 2024 obliges Member States to use deposit–return systems to achieve high collection rates for beverage packaging and, as a result, to enhance packaging circularity. As evidence supporting this approach, i.e., that deposit systems indeed are an efficient solution for packaging waste collection, is still scattered, this article provides a systematic review of the evidence on various aspects of the use of deposit systems. A key finding of our review is that both scientific and empirical evidence support the European Union’s decision to make deposit–return systems mandatory: in European countries that have fully operational systems, the collection rates of packaging covered by these systems exceeded 85%. In addition to this positive contribution to packaging circularity, a significant (40–60%) reduction in littering is reported after implementation of the deposit systems. A significant novelty of this review is the presentation of the latest empirical data suggesting that deposit systems may be comparable to alternative collection methods in terms of costs to producers. Comprehensive assessments conducted using the cost–benefit analysis methods confirm that deposit systems generate net social benefits. It is suggested that innovations in logistics contribute to reduced environmental impacts of transport and transport-related costs. For this reason, updated life cycle assessments and cost–benefit analyses of deposit systems are needed to assess the role of deposit systems within the European circular economy framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Edyta Sidorczuk-Pietraszko & Wojciech Piontek & Anna Larsson, 2025. "Are Deposit–Return Schemes an Optimal Solution for Beverage Container Collection in the European Union? An Evidence Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-23, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8791-:d:1762027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8791/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8791/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarah Yanyue Yu, 2021. "An In Medias Res Economic Cost‐Benefit Analysis of ACT Container Deposit Scheme," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 40(1), pages 78-90, March.
    2. ALBIZZATI Paola & ANTONOPOULOS Ioannis & CARO Dario & CRISTOBAL GARCIA Jorge & EGLE Lukas & GAUDILLAT Pierre & MANFREDI Simone & MARSCHINSKI Robert & MARTINEZ TUREGANO David & PIERRI Erika & SAVEYN Ha, 2023. "Development of an EU harmonised model for separate municipal waste collection and related policy support : literature review," JRC Research Reports JRC130419, Joint Research Centre.
    3. Marcela Malindzakova & Jana Štofková & Milan Majernik, 2022. "Economic–Environmental Performance of Reverse Logistics of Disposable Beverage Packaging," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-12, June.
    4. ALBIZZATI Paola Federica & TONINI Davide & GAUDILLAT Pierre, 2024. "Impacts of the collection and treatment of dry recyclables," JRC Research Reports JRC136657, Joint Research Centre.
    5. Ciara O’Dwyer & Atiq Zaman & Jessica K. Breadsell, 2022. "The Uptake of Container Deposit Schemes: A Case Study in Perth, Western Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-30, September.
    6. Janis Brizga & Janis Ulme & Anna Larsson, 2024. "Impact of the Implementation of the Deposit Refund System on Coastal Littering in Latvia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-10, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. R. Basuhi & Karan Bhuwalka & Richard Roth & Elsa A. Olivetti, 2024. "Evaluating strategies to increase PET bottle recycling in the United States," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 28(4), pages 916-927, August.
    2. Sabina Rietz & Anna Kremel, 2024. "Consumer Behavior as a Challenge and Opportunity for Circular Food Packaging—a Systematic Literature Review," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 413-438, March.
    3. Artūras Torkelis & Jolanta Dvarionienė & Gintaras Denafas, 2024. "The Factors Influencing the Recycling of Plastic and Composite Packaging Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-30, October.
    4. Ciara O’Dwyer & Atiq Zaman & Jessica K. Breadsell, 2022. "The Uptake of Container Deposit Schemes: A Case Study in Perth, Western Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-30, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8791-:d:1762027. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.