IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i22p9504-d445395.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Policy Analyses on Promoting the Recycling of Express Packages

Author

Listed:
  • Lu Xiao

    (School of Management, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)

  • Rongrong Fan

    (School of Mathematical Science, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)

  • Chaojie Wang

    (School of Mathematical Science, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)

  • Jun Wang

    (Institute of Applied System Analysis, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)

Abstract

With the development of e-commerce industry, the express enterprises are growing up rapidly. At the same time, they produce a large amount of express packaging garbage. The recycling of express packages has become an important issue for environment protection. In this paper, three types of possible policies are discussed for consideration: subsidy, penalty, and tax reduction. We analyze the efficiency of each policy and find the conditions under which the express packaging manufacturers prefer to recycle and reprocess the used products. A two-stage model is established from the perspective of manufacturers to discuss the production and recycling strategies under the three policies. Besides, we suggest an optimal choice between subsidy and tax reduction for the government when the budget is fixed. This paper provides guidelines for the government to improve related policies on promoting the recycling of express packages.

Suggested Citation

  • Lu Xiao & Rongrong Fan & Chaojie Wang & Jun Wang, 2020. "Policy Analyses on Promoting the Recycling of Express Packages," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-12, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:22:p:9504-:d:445395
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/22/9504/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/22/9504/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Biyu Liu & Martin Holmbom & Anders Segerstedt & Weida Chen, 2015. "Effects of carbon emission regulations on remanufacturing decisions with limited information of demand distribution," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(2), pages 532-548, January.
    2. Yenipazarli, Arda, 2016. "Managing new and remanufactured products to mitigate environmental damage under emissions regulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(1), pages 117-130.
    3. Pazoki, Mostafa & Zaccour, Georges, 2019. "A mechanism to promote product recovery and environmental performance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(2), pages 601-614.
    4. Gökçe Esenduran & Eda Kemahlıoğlu-Ziya & Jayashankar M. Swaminathan, 2017. "Impact of Take-Back Regulation on the Remanufacturing Industry," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(5), pages 924-944, May.
    5. De Giovanni, Pietro & Reddy, Puduru V. & Zaccour, Georges, 2016. "Incentive strategies for an optimal recovery program in a closed-loop supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(2), pages 605-617.
    6. Feng Dong & Yifei Hua, 2018. "Are Chinese Residents Willing to Recycle Express Packaging Waste? Evidence from a Bayesian Regularized Neural Network Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-24, November.
    7. da Cruz, Nuno F. & Ferreira, Sandra & Cabral, Marta & Simões, Pedro & Marques, Rui Cunha, 2014. "Packaging waste recycling in Europe: is the industry paying for it?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 59755, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Jonathan Chemama & Maxime C. Cohen & Ruben Lobel & Georgia Perakis, 2019. "Consumer Subsidies with a Strategic Supplier: Commitment vs. Flexibility," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(2), pages 681-713, February.
    9. Mitra, Supriya & Webster, Scott, 2008. "Competition in remanufacturing and the effects of government subsidies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 287-298, February.
    10. De Giovanni, Pietro, 2018. "A joint maximization incentive in closed-loop supply chains with competing retailers: The case of spent-battery recycling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(1), pages 128-147.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ying Zhan & Yue Sun & Junfei Xu, 2023. "A Study on the Recycling Classification Behavior of Express Packaging Based on UTAUT under “Dual Carbon” Targets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-22, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ehsan Shekarian & Simme Douwe Flapper, 2021. "Analyzing the Structure of Closed-Loop Supply Chains: A Game Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-32, January.
    2. You Qiu & Youliang Jin, 2022. "Impact of environmental taxes on remanufacturing decisions of a duopoly," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 55(4), pages 2479-2498, November.
    3. Pazoki, Mostafa & Zaccour, Georges, 2019. "A mechanism to promote product recovery and environmental performance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(2), pages 601-614.
    4. Zhang, Yunrong & Hong, Zhaofu & Chen, Zhixiang & Glock, Christoph H., 2020. "Tax or subsidy? Design and selection of regulatory policies for remanufacturing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(3), pages 885-900.
    5. Pietro De Giovanni & Georges Zaccour, 2022. "A selective survey of game-theoretic models of closed-loop supply chains," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 314(1), pages 77-116, July.
    6. Pietro Giovanni & Georges Zaccour, 2019. "A selective survey of game-theoretic models of closed-loop supply chains," 4OR, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 1-44, March.
    7. Ma, Peng & Gong, Yeming & Mirchandani, Prakash, 2020. "Trade-in for remanufactured products: Pricing with double reference effects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    8. Zhang, Abraham & Wang, Jason X. & Farooque, Muhammad & Wang, Yulan & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2021. "Multi-dimensional circular supply chain management: A comparative review of the state-of-the-art practices and research," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    9. Pazoki, Mostafa & Samarghandi, Hamed, 2020. "Take-back regulation: Remanufacturing or Eco-design?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    10. Yunting Feng & Yong Geng & Ge Zhao & Mengya Li, 2022. "Carbon Emission Constraint Policy in an OEM and Outsourcing Remanufacturer Supply Chain with Consumer Preferences," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-16, April.
    11. Luo, Ruiling & Zhou, Li & Song, Yang & Fan, Tijun, 2022. "Evaluating the impact of carbon tax policy on manufacturing and remanufacturing decisions in a closed-loop supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    12. Chen, Yuyu & Li, Bangyi & Zhang, Guoqing & Bai, Qingguo, 2020. "Quantity and collection decisions of the remanufacturing enterprise under both the take-back and carbon emission capacity regulations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    13. Xiao Jiang & Qiang Hu & Tingyuan Lou & Wenjin Zuo & Jicai Li, 2023. "Impact of Government Environmental Regulations on Remanufacturing Supply Chain with Multi-Subject Responsibility for Recycling and Disposal," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, April.
    14. De, Arijit & Ray, Ankita & Kundu, Tanmoy & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing, 2023. "Is it wise to compete or to collaborate? Remanufacturing business models under collective extended producer responsibility legislation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    15. Liu, Zhi & Li, Kevin W. & Tang, Juan & Gong, Bengang & Huang, Jun, 2021. "Optimal operations of a closed-loop supply chain under a dual regulation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    16. Yuyu Chen & Bangyi Li & Qingguo Bai & Zhi Liu, 2018. "Decision-Making and Environmental Implications under Cap-and-Trade and Take-Back Regulations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-25, April.
    17. Xiaoxiao Chang & Guangye Xu & Qian Wang & Yongguang Zhong, 2020. "A Game Theoretic Approach for Eco-Design and Remanufacturing Considering Take-Back Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-21, September.
    18. Yanting Huang & Zongjun Wang, 2017. "Dual-Recycling Channel Decision in a Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Cost Disruptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-28, November.
    19. Qi Wang & Dunbing Tang & Shipei Li & Jun Yang & Miguel A. Salido & Adriana Giret & Haihua Zhu, 2019. "An Optimization Approach for the Coordinated Low-Carbon Design of Product Family and Remanufactured Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-22, January.
    20. Deqing Ma & Pengcheng Ma & Jinsong Hu, 2024. "The Impact of Blockchain Technology Adoption on an E-Commerce Closed-Loop Supply Chain Considering Consumer Trust," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-41, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:22:p:9504-:d:445395. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.