IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i21p9467-d1511107.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hierarchy Analysis of Water Demand Among Hotel Consumers for Water Appliances

Author

Listed:
  • Rong Cai

    (China National Institute of Standardization, Beijing 100191, China
    Key Laboratory of Energy Efficiency, Water Efficiency and Greenization, State Administration for Market Regulation, Beijing 102200, China)

  • Lingsi Kong

    (China National Institute of Standardization, Beijing 100191, China
    Key Laboratory of Energy Efficiency, Water Efficiency and Greenization, State Administration for Market Regulation, Beijing 102200, China)

  • Yan Bai

    (China National Institute of Standardization, Beijing 100191, China
    Key Laboratory of Energy Efficiency, Water Efficiency and Greenization, State Administration for Market Regulation, Beijing 102200, China)

  • Jialin Liu

    (China National Institute of Standardization, Beijing 100191, China
    Key Laboratory of Energy Efficiency, Water Efficiency and Greenization, State Administration for Market Regulation, Beijing 102200, China)

  • Mengting Hu

    (China National Institute of Standardization, Beijing 100191, China
    Key Laboratory of Energy Efficiency, Water Efficiency and Greenization, State Administration for Market Regulation, Beijing 102200, China)

  • Xue Bai

    (China National Institute of Standardization, Beijing 100191, China
    Key Laboratory of Energy Efficiency, Water Efficiency and Greenization, State Administration for Market Regulation, Beijing 102200, China)

Abstract

The sustainable management of domestic water use is essential for China’s ongoing development. Despite its significance, public service water use, especially within the hotel industry, is frequently neglected. This industry not only accounts for substantial water usage, but it has also witnessed exponential growth over the past decade. In light of this, this study developed a survey on the water demand and behavior of hotel consumers and built a water consumption model to analyze the different characteristics of the total volume of water used by various water appliances. Furthermore, by dividing the hierarchical intervals of each water-use behavior, it identified the main water-saving target of each water appliance. The results showed that the daily water demand of each consumer in hotels ranged from 45 to 141 L/(person·d). Among the various water-use appliances, faucets had the highest proportion of excessive water use, reaching nearly 40%, which implies a relatively large potential for saving water. Additionally, showers were the next major contributors to water consumption, whereas the proportion of excessive water use for water closets was relatively small. Owing to different habits, there is also variability in the main groups of people targeted for water conservation across water appliances, with females having the largest potential for water consumption in hotels. The results of this study can provide greatvaluable insights for enhancing water-use efficiency in hotels and standardizing water management practices within the industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Rong Cai & Lingsi Kong & Yan Bai & Jialin Liu & Mengting Hu & Xue Bai, 2024. "Hierarchy Analysis of Water Demand Among Hotel Consumers for Water Appliances," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-13, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:21:p:9467-:d:1511107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/21/9467/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/21/9467/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hasrul Hazman Hasan & Siti Fatin Mohd Razali & Nor Hidayah Mohd Razali, 2021. "Does the Household Save Water? Evidence from Behavioral Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, January.
    2. Mosisa Teferi Timotewos & Matthias Barjenbruch, 2024. "Examining the Prospects of Residential Water Demand Management Policy Regulations in Ethiopia: Implications for Sustainable Water Resource Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-21, June.
    3. Jaime Torres, Mónica M. & Carlsson, Fredrik, 2018. "Direct and spillover effects of a social information campaign on residential water-savings," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 222-243.
    4. Ada Jansen & Carl‐erik Schulz, 2006. "Water Demand And The Urban Poor: A Study Of The Factors Influencing Water Consumption Among Households In Cape Town, South Africa," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 74(3), pages 593-609, September.
    5. Mengshan Lee & Berrin Tansel & Maribel Balbin, 2013. "Urban Sustainability Incentives for Residential Water Conservation: Adoption of Multiple High Efficiency Appliances," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 27(7), pages 2531-2540, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. María Ángeles García-Valiñas & Sara Suárez-Fernández, 2022. "Are Economic Tools Useful to Manage Residential Water Demand? A Review of Old Issues and Emerging Topics," Post-Print hal-04067487, HAL.
    2. Roberto Balado‐Naves & María A. García‐Valiñas & David Roibás Alonso, 2025. "Assessing the efficiency of residential water demand: The role of information," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 47(2), pages 556-585, May.
    3. Stefano Clò & Tommaso Reggiani & Sabrina Ruberto, 2024. "Consumption Feedback and Water Saving: A Field Intervention Evaluation in the Metropolitan Area of Milan," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 87(9), pages 2259-2308, September.
    4. Bonan, Jacopo & Cattaneo, Cristina & D’Adda, Giovanna & Tavoni, Massimo, 2019. "Can We Make Social Information Programs More Effective? The Role of Identity and Values," RFF Working Paper Series 19-21, Resources for the Future.
    5. Palm, Alvar & Lantz, Björn, 2020. "Information dissemination and residential solar PV adoption rates: The effect of an information campaign in Sweden," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    6. Bonan, J. & Cattaneo, C. & d’Adda, G. & Galliera, A. & Tavoni, M., 2024. "Widening the scope: The direct and spillover effects of nudging water efficiency in the presence of other behavioral interventions," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    7. Wen, Hong-xing & Wang, Chan & Nie, Pu-yan, 2021. "Acceleration of rural households’ conversion to cleaner cooking fuels: The importance and mechanisms of peer effects," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    8. Gill, Tania & Punt, Cecilia, 2010. "The Potential Impact of Increased Irrigation Water Tariffs in South Africa," 2010 AAAE Third Conference/AEASA 48th Conference, September 19-23, 2010, Cape Town, South Africa 96425, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).
    9. Daniel A. Brent & Corey Lott & Michael Taylor & Joseph Cook & Kimberly Rollins & Shawn Stoddard, 2020. "What Causes Heterogeneous Responses to Social Comparison Messages for Water Conservation?," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 77(3), pages 503-537, November.
    10. Liangxin Fan & Guobin Liu & Fei Wang & Coen Ritsema & Violette Geissen, 2014. "Domestic Water Consumption under Intermittent and Continuous Modes of Water Supply," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(3), pages 853-865, February.
    11. Lopez-Rivas, Jose D., 2024. "Spreading the word! Effects of a randomized normative informational campaign on residential water conservation," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79.
    12. Brick, Kerri & De Martino, Samantha & Visser, Martine, 2023. "Behavioural nudges for water conservation in unequal settings: Experimental evidence from Cape Town," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    13. Wang, Yitong & Fan, Ruguo & Du, Kang & Bao, Xuguang, 2023. "Exploring incentives to promote electric vehicles diffusion under subsidy abolition: An evolutionary analysis on multiplex consumer social networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    14. Alt, Marius & Berger, Marius & Bersch, Johannes, 2023. "Investor responses to information updates on peer behavior and public investment policy: The case of green investments," ZEW Discussion Papers 23-024, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    15. Tonke, Sebastian, 2020. "Imperfect Procedural Knowledge: Evidence from a Field Experiment to Encourage Water Conservation," VfS Annual Conference 2020 (Virtual Conference): Gender Economics 224536, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    16. Botao Qin & Haoyan Chen, 2022. "Does the nudge effect persist? Evidence from a field experiment using social comparison message in China," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(3), pages 689-703, July.
    17. Banerjee, Sanchayan & Ferreira, Alipio, 2024. "Virtual reality is only mildly effective in improving forest conservation behaviors," MPRA Paper 124149, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Ukasha Ramli, 2021. "Social Norms Based Eco-Feedback for Household Water Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-13, March.
    19. Mina Khodadad & Mohsen Sanei & Christian Narvaez-Montoya & Ismael Aguilar-Barajas, 2022. "Climatic Hazards and the Associated Impacts on Households’ Willingness to Adopt Water-Saving Measures: Evidence from Mexico," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-17, May.
    20. Raisa Sherif, 2021. "Are pro-environment behaviours substitutes or complements? Evidence from the field," Working Papers tax-mpg-rps-2021-03, Max Planck Institute for Tax Law and Public Finance.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:21:p:9467-:d:1511107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.