IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i20p8886-d1498256.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

AI Leads, Cybersecurity Follows: Unveiling Research Priorities in Sustainable Development Goal-Relevant Technologies across Nations

Author

Listed:
  • Emanuela Bran

    (Faculty of Automatic Control and Computers, National University of Science and Technology Politehnica Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania
    Doctoral School of Sociology, University of Bucharest, 010181 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Răzvan Rughiniș

    (Faculty of Automatic Control and Computers, National University of Science and Technology Politehnica Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania
    Academy of Romanian Scientists, 3 Ilfov, 050044 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Dinu Țurcanu

    (Faculty of Electronics and Telecommunications and National Institute of Innovations in Cybersecurity “CYBERCOR”, Technical University of Moldova, MD-2004 Chișinău, Moldova)

  • Alexandru Radovici

    (Faculty of Automatic Control and Computers, National University of Science and Technology Politehnica Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

This study presents a global analysis of research priorities for technologies relevant to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). We examine 18 technological domains across countries, introducing a novel within-country rank metric to normalize differences in research output. Using a combination of linear regression and K-means cluster analysis, we identify factors influencing overall productivity and reveal distinct patterns in research priorities among nations. Our analysis of Web of Science total publication data yields five country clusters with specific technological focus areas: Eco-Tech Innovators, Cyber-Digital Architects, Bio-Industrial Pioneers, Geo-Data Security Analysts, and Cyber-Sustainable Integrators. We find that while economic indicators strongly predict overall research productivity, countries with similar economic profiles often exhibit divergent research priorities. Artificial Intelligence emerges as a top priority across all clusters, while areas such as blockchain and digital twins show lower prioritization despite their theoretical importance. Our findings reveal unexpected similarities in research focus among geopolitically diverse countries and highlight regional patterns in technological emphasis. This study offers valuable information for policymakers and researchers, enhancing our understanding of the global landscape of SDG-relevant technological research and potential avenues for international collaboration.

Suggested Citation

  • Emanuela Bran & Răzvan Rughiniș & Dinu Țurcanu & Alexandru Radovici, 2024. "AI Leads, Cybersecurity Follows: Unveiling Research Priorities in Sustainable Development Goal-Relevant Technologies across Nations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-31, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:8886-:d:1498256
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/8886/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/8886/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alonso Rodríguez-Navarro & Ricardo Brito, 2022. "The link between countries’ economic and scientific wealth has a complex dependence on technological activity and research policy," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(5), pages 2871-2896, May.
    2. Nadine Bachmann & Shailesh Tripathi & Manuel Brunner & Herbert Jodlbauer, 2022. "The Contribution of Data-Driven Technologies in Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-33, February.
    3. Rughinis, Cosima & Vulpe, Simona Nicoleta & Flaherty, Michael G. & Vasile, Sorina, 2022. "Vaccination, life expectancy, and trust: Patterns of COVID-19 vaccination rates around the world," MPRA Paper 111981, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Arash Hajikhani & Arho Suominen, 2022. "Mapping the sustainable development goals (SDGs) in science, technology and innovation: application of machine learning in SDG-oriented artefact detection," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(11), pages 6661-6693, November.
    5. Adele Parmentola & Antonella Petrillo & Ilaria Tutore & Fabio De Felice, 2022. "Is blockchain able to enhance environmental sustainability? A systematic review and research agenda from the perspective of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 194-217, January.
    6. ElMassah, Suzanna & Mohieldin, Mahmoud, 2020. "Digital transformation and localizing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Charfeddine, Lanouar & Umlai, Mohamed, 2023. "ICT sector, digitization and environmental sustainability: A systematic review of the literature from 2000 to 2022," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    2. Matteo Vaccargiu & Andrea Pinna & Roberto Tonelli & Luisanna Cocco, 2023. "Blockchain in the Energy Sector for SDG Achievement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-23, October.
    3. Hadiqa Ahmad & Muhammad Yaqub & Seung Hwan Lee, 2024. "Environmental-, social-, and governance-related factors for business investment and sustainability: a scientometric review of global trends," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 2965-2987, February.
    4. Katarzyna Bułkowska & Magdalena Zielińska & Maciej Bułkowski, 2024. "Blockchain-Based Management of Recyclable Plastic Waste," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-25, June.
    5. Chun-Yi Lin & Chen Li & Sadaf Mahmood & Feng Guo & Zuoyi Qian, 2024. "Integrating Culture and Tourism: A Resilient Scale for Digital Transformation Innovation," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(4), pages 16122-16155, December.
    6. Wang, Weilong & Xiao, Deheng & Wang, Jianlong & Wu, Haitao, 2024. "The cost of pollution in the digital era: Impediments of air pollution on enterprise digital transformation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    7. Aditi S. Saha & Rakesh D. Raut & Vinay Surendra Yadav & Abhijit Majumdar, 2022. "Blockchain Changing the Outlook of the Sustainable Food Supply Chain to Achieve Net Zero?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-21, December.
    8. Diána Esses & Mária Szalmáné Csete & Bálint Németh, 2021. "Sustainability and Digital Transformation in the Visegrad Group of Central European Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, May.
    9. Pavel Ciaian & Andrej Cupak & Pirmin Fessler & d'Artis Kancs, 2022. "Environmental-Social-Governance Preferences and Investments in Crypto-Assets (Pavel Ciaian, Andrej Cupak, Pirmin Fessler, d’Artis Kancs)," Working Papers 243, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank).
    10. Surajit Bag & Muhammad Sabbir Rahman & Susmi Routray & Santosh Kumar Shrivastav & Soni Agrawal, 2024. "Exploring the potential of blockchain‐enabled smart contracts for achieving net‐zero emissions: An empirical study," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5), pages 3965-3985, July.
    11. Stavros Sindakis & Gazal Showkat, 2024. "The digital revolution in India: bridging the gap in rural technology adoption," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-28, December.
    12. Guo, Bingnan & Feng, Yu & Lin, Ji, 2023. "Digital inclusive finance and digital transformation of enterprises," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    13. Miao Su & Su‐Han Woo & Xiaochun Chen & Keun‐sik Park, 2023. "Identifying critical success factors for the agri‐food cold chain's sustainable development: When the strategy system comes into play," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 444-461, January.
    14. Yongjie Feng & Zenglian Zhang & Jingxian Zhang, 2024. "Navigating the Digital Transformation Terrain: Insights into the Interplay of Compensation, Incentives, and Managerial Behavior," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(4), pages 16799-16848, December.
    15. Songling Yang & Yafei Tai & Jianing Liu, 2024. "Mechanism Analysis and Path Study of Digital Transformation on Corporate Governance: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-24, October.
    16. Yingjia Zhong & Hongyan Zhao & Tianbao Yin, 2023. "Resource Bundling: How Does Enterprise Digital Transformation Affect Enterprise ESG Development?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-18, January.
    17. Haochun Yang & Yunyi Liang, 2023. "Examining the Connectivity between Urban Rail Transport and Regular Bus Transport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-14, May.
    18. Guan, Weili & Li, Yuming & Liu, Jun & Ullah, Sana & Metawa, Noura, 2024. "How does digital government affect natural resource sustainability? A global perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    19. Ha Minh Nguyen & Ngoc Hoang Bui, 2024. "The heterogeneity impacts of digital transformation, human capital, and trade openness on income and labour productivity in Vietnam," HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY, vol. 14(4), pages 157-171.
    20. Anna Sanina & Evgeny Styrin & Eran Vigoda-Gadot & Maria Yudina & Anna Semenova, 2024. "Digital Government Transformation and Sustainable Development Goals: To What Extent Are They Interconnected? Bibliometric Analysis Results," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-17, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:8886-:d:1498256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.