IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i18p7885-d1474882.html

A Group Intuitionistic Fuzzy Exponential TODIM Method Considering Attribute Interactions Applied to Green Building Material Supplier Selection

Author

Listed:
  • Zhili Jia

    (School of Management, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Liyi Liu

    (School of Information Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)

  • Zhaofeng Diao

    (School of Management, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

Abstract

Green building, driven by the goal of sustainable development, has prompted extensive attention to be paid to the environmental impact of its materials. However, some of the traditional methods of evaluating building material suppliers and attribute systems are not able to adapt to the new issues arising from the green context. This paper aims to provide a new solution for selecting green building material suppliers to enhance the green efficiency of buildings. Specifically, this paper presents a framework for evaluating and selecting suppliers of green building materials that meet the criteria of environmental friendliness and sustainability. A comprehensive evaluation attribute system is established, encompassing cost, quality, service level, delivery capability, and green and sustainable ability. Additionally, a group decision-making method based on the exponential TODIM (an acronym in Portuguese for Interactive and Multi-attribute Decision Making) and intuitionistic fuzzy numbers is developed to integrate expert opinions from diverse domains. Intuitionistic fuzzy numbers represent an extension of traditional fuzzy sets, offering a means of more fully and accurately responding to the inherent vagueness and hesitancy of human thinking. They can often prove invaluable when faced with problems containing uncertainty. Moreover, to obtain more precise attribute weights, the λ -fuzzy measure, Choquet integral, and Shapley value are employed to consider attribute interactions. Subsequently, a selection case involving six timber suppliers was proposed. Subsystem analysis was employed to ascertain the relative strengths and weaknesses of the various suppliers, with a view to facilitating future improvements. The findings indicated that green and sustainability capability attributes exert a considerable influence on the selection of green building material suppliers. Consequently, suppliers distinguished under this standard may encounter challenges in attaining exemplary rankings. Comparative analysis and robustness analysis have demonstrated the efficacy, superiority, and stability of the proposed framework. The findings of this paper can provide a reference for companies engaged in or planning to develop green buildings and help them choose green building material suppliers, which can help them achieve the expected green building efficiency and promote the sustainable development of the industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhili Jia & Liyi Liu & Zhaofeng Diao, 2024. "A Group Intuitionistic Fuzzy Exponential TODIM Method Considering Attribute Interactions Applied to Green Building Material Supplier Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-24, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:18:p:7885-:d:1474882
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/18/7885/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/18/7885/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kirschstein, Thomas & Meisel, Frank, 2019. "A multi-period multi-commodity lot-sizing problem with supplier selection, storage selection and discounts for the process industry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(2), pages 393-406.
    2. Liu, Liyi & Tu, Yan & Zhang, Wen & Shen, Wenjing, 2024. "Supplier selection for emergency material based on group exponential TODIM method considering hesitant fuzzy linguistic set: A case study of China," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    3. Abhijeet Ghadge & Sarat Kumar Jena & Sachin Kamble & Dheeraj Misra & Manoj Kumar Tiwari, 2021. "Impact of financial risk on supply chains: a manufacturer-supplier relational perspective," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(23), pages 7090-7105, December.
    4. Jung-Fa Tsai & Sheng-Che Wu & Thi Khanh Linh Pham & Ming-Hua Lin, 2023. "Analysis of Key Factors for Green Supplier Selection: A Case Study of the Electronics Industry in Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-16, May.
    5. Yingmiao Qian & Xian-An Yu & Malin Song & Zhiyang Shen, 2023. "Complexity analysis and control of game behavior of subjects in green building materials supply chain considering technology subsidies," Post-Print hal-03974946, HAL.
    6. Mohammad Masfiqul Alam Bhuiyan & Ahmed Hammad, 2023. "A Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision Support System for Selecting the Most Sustainable Structural Material for a Multistory Building Construction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-36, February.
    7. K. Katsaliaki & P. Galetsi & S. Kumar, 2022. "Supply chain disruptions and resilience: a major review and future research agenda," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 965-1002, December.
    8. Aly Owida & P.J. Byrne & Cathal Heavey & Paul Blake & Khaled S. El-Kilany, 2016. "A simulation based continuous improvement approach for manufacturing based field repair service contracting," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(21), pages 6458-6477, November.
    9. Santonab Chakraborty & Rakesh D. Raut & T. M. Rofin & Shankar Chakraborty, 2024. "On solving a healthcare supplier selection problem using MCDM methods in intuitionistic fuzzy environment," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 61(2), pages 680-708, June.
    10. Liu, Hua-Wen & Wang, Guo-Jun, 2007. "Multi-criteria decision-making methods based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(1), pages 220-233, May.
    11. Cuoghi, Kaio Guilherme & Leoneti, Alexandre Bevilacqua, 2019. "A group MCDA method for aiding decision-making of complex problems in public sector: The case of Belo Monte Dam," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adis Puška & Nebojša Kojić & Aleksandra Pavlović & Ranko Bojanić & Ilija Stojanović & Vesna Krpina & Radivoj Prodanović & Miroslav Nedeljković, 2025. "Selection of Green Packaging Suppliers for Circular Economy Needs Using Intuitionistic Fuzzy Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-29, September.
    2. Wenshuai Wu, 2024. "Probabilistic Linguistic TODIM Method with Probabilistic Linguistic Entropy Weight and Hamming Distance for Teaching Reform Plan Evaluation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-18, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Liyi & Tu, Yan & Zhang, Wen & Shen, Wenjing, 2024. "Supplier selection for emergency material based on group exponential TODIM method considering hesitant fuzzy linguistic set: A case study of China," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    2. Jing, Peng & Li, Shuohan & Wang, Minglu, 2025. "Digital empowerment, industry chain integration and corporate energy efficiency," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    3. Dmitry Ivanov, 2026. "Collaborative emergency adaptation for ripple effect mitigation in intertwined supply networks," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 359(2), pages 1727-1743, April.
    4. Letizia Tebaldi & Amedeo Mattia Gubiotti & Giuseppe Vignali, 2024. "An Analytic Model for Quantitatively Assessing the Resilience Level of an Agri-Food Supply Chain: Development and Validation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-18, December.
    5. Ouyang, Yao & Pedrycz, Witold, 2016. "A new model for intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attributes decision making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(2), pages 677-682.
    6. Shi Yin & Yudan Zhao, 2024. "An agent-based evolutionary system model of the transformation from building material industry (BMI) to green intelligent BMI under supply chain management," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Zhi Pei, 2017. "Multi-attribute decision making based on a novel IF point operator," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 505-524, December.
    8. López, C. & Morales-Contreras, M.F. & Langella, I.M. & Alonso-Monge, J., 2025. "Modeling supply chain disruptions due to geopolitical Reasons: A systematic literature review," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    9. ChangJun Wang & Li-Meng-Tao Zhong, 2025. "Reliable design of humanitarian supply chain under correlated disruptions: a two-stage distributionally robust approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 355(3), pages 2999-3047, December.
    10. Francesco Cafforio & SangWoo Park & Ilaria Giannoccaro & Layek Abdel‐Malek, 2025. "Resilience of Circular Supply Chains: Analyzing the Impact of Take‐Back Strategies via Efficient Computation of Post‐Disturbance Equilibrium," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(6), pages 8721-8736, December.
    11. Mohammad Khosroabadi & Jafar Gheidar-Kheljani & Mohammad Hosein Karimi Gavareshki, 2024. "Utilizing Multi-vehicle Traveling Purchaser Problem for Multiple-Supplier Selection and Multi-period Lot-Sizing in a Fuzzy Demand Environment," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 5(4), pages 1-28, December.
    12. Wang, Xun & Rodrigues, Vasco Sanchez & Demir, Emrah & Sarkis, Joseph, 2024. "Algorithm aversion during disruptions: The case of safety stock," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    13. Sina Nayeri & Zeinab Sazvar, 2026. "Sustainable evaluation of the raw material providers based on industry 5.0 and circular economy aspects: a new stochastic method," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 63(1), pages 134-163, March.
    14. Huang, Xiaobing & Xie, Jiawei, 2024. "Impact of green credit policies on the global value chain position of heavy polluting enterprises," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    15. Eri Nakamura & Fumitoshi Mizutani, 2026. "Resilience strategies for regional essential service providers: evidence from disasters, pandemics, and economic crises," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 75(2), pages 1-36, June.
    16. Leoneti, Alexandre Bevilacqua & Gomes, Luiz Flavio Autran Monteiro, 2021. "Modeling multicriteria group decision making as games from enhanced pairwise comparisons," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 8(C).
    17. Hossein Sayyadi Tooranloo & Arezoo Sadat Ayatollah, 2024. "Neutrosophic VIKOR approach for multi-attribute group decision-making," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 34(2), pages 121-134.
    18. Mahsa Montajabiha, 2016. "An Extended PROMETHE II Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making Technique Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Logic for Sustainable Energy Planning," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 221-244, March.
    19. Syed Abdul Rehman Khan & Adnan Ahmed Sheikh & Ibrahim Rashid Al Shamsi & Zhang Yu, 2025. "The Implications of Artificial Intelligence for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises’ Sustainable Development in the Areas of Blockchain Technology, Supply Chain Resilience, and Closed-Loop Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-22, January.
    20. Yashpal Sharma, 2026. "Industry 4.0 Technologies for Sourcing Resilience," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 27(1), pages 76-92, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:18:p:7885-:d:1474882. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.