IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i17p7830-d1473855.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal Battery Storage Configuration for High-Proportion Renewable Power Systems Considering Minimum Inertia Requirements

Author

Listed:
  • Xu Guo

    (School of Electrical and Power Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

  • Yang Li

    (School of Electrical and Power Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

  • Feng Wu

    (School of Electrical and Power Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

  • Linjun Shi

    (School of Electrical and Power Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

  • Yuzhe Chen

    (School of Electrical and Power Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

  • Hailun Wang

    (School of Electrical and Power Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

Abstract

With the continuous development of renewable energy worldwide, the issue of frequency stability in power systems has become increasingly serious. Enhancing the inertia level of power systems by configuring battery storage to provide virtual inertia has garnered significant research attention in academia. However, addressing the non-linear characteristics of frequency stability constraints, which complicate model solving, and managing the uncertainties associated with renewable energy and load, are the main challenges in planning energy storage for high-proportion renewable power systems. In this context, this paper proposes a battery storage configuration model for high-proportion renewable power systems that considers minimum inertia requirements and the uncertainties of wind and solar power. First, frequency stability constraints are transformed into minimum inertia constraints, primarily considering the rate of change of frequency (ROCOF) and nadir frequency (NF) indicators during the transformation process. Second, using historical wind and solar data, a time-series probability scenario set is constructed through clustering methods to model the uncertainties of wind and solar power. A stochastic optimization method is then adopted to establish a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) model for the battery storage configuration of high-proportion renewable power systems, considering minimum inertia requirements and wind-solar uncertainties. Finally, through a modified IEEE-39 bus system, it was verified that the proposed method is more economical in addressing frequency stability issues in power systems with a high proportion of renewable energy compared to traditional scheduling methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Xu Guo & Yang Li & Feng Wu & Linjun Shi & Yuzhe Chen & Hailun Wang, 2024. "Optimal Battery Storage Configuration for High-Proportion Renewable Power Systems Considering Minimum Inertia Requirements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-23, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7830-:d:1473855
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7830/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7830/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shen, Haotian & Zhang, Hualiang & Xu, Yujie & Chen, Haisheng & Zhang, Zhilai & Li, Wenkai & Su, Xu & Xu, Yalin & Zhu, Yilin, 2024. "Two stage robust economic dispatching of microgrid considering uncertainty of wind, solar and electricity load along with carbon emission predicted by neural network model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 300(C).
    2. Chen, J.J. & Zhao, Y.L. & Peng, K. & Wu, P.Z., 2017. "Optimal trade-off planning for wind-solar power day-ahead scheduling under uncertainties," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1969-1981.
    3. Zhang, Rufeng & Chen, Yan & Li, Zhengmao & Jiang, Tao & Li, Xue, 2024. "Two-stage robust operation of electricity-gas-heat integrated multi-energy microgrids considering heterogeneous uncertainties," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 371(C).
    4. Hemmati, Reza & Saboori, Hedayat & Jirdehi, Mehdi Ahmadi, 2017. "Stochastic planning and scheduling of energy storage systems for congestion management in electric power systems including renewable energy resources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 380-387.
    5. Guo, Yi & Ming, Bo & Huang, Qiang & Wang, Yimin & Zheng, Xudong & Zhang, Wei, 2022. "Risk-averse day-ahead generation scheduling of hydro–wind–photovoltaic complementary systems considering the steady requirement of power delivery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiao, P.H. & Chen, J.J. & Cai, X. & Wang, L.L. & Zhao, Y.L. & Zhang, X.H. & Chen, W.G., 2021. "Joint active and reactive for allocation of renewable energy and energy storage under uncertain coupling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
    2. Firouzmakan, Pouya & Hooshmand, Rahmat-Allah & Bornapour, Mosayeb & Khodabakhshian, Amin, 2019. "A comprehensive stochastic energy management system of micro-CHP units, renewable energy sources and storage systems in microgrids considering demand response programs," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 355-368.
    3. Sakthivel, V.P. & Thirumal, K. & Sathya, P.D., 2022. "Short term scheduling of hydrothermal power systems with photovoltaic and pumped storage plants using quasi-oppositional turbulent water flow optimization," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 459-492.
    4. Fabio Massaro & Maria Luisa Di Silvestre & Marco Ferraro & Francesco Montana & Eleonora Riva Sanseverino & Salvatore Ruffino, 2024. "Energy Hub Model for the Massive Adoption of Hydrogen in Power Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-31, September.
    5. Lee, Yoonjae & Ha, Byeongmin & Hwangbo, Soonho, 2022. "Generative model-based hybrid forecasting model for renewable electricity supply using long short-term memory networks: A case study of South Korea's energy transition policy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 69-87.
    6. Beata Kurc & Xymena Gross & Natalia Szymlet & Łukasz Rymaniak & Krystian Woźniak & Marita Pigłowska, 2024. "Hydrogen-Powered Vehicles: A Paradigm Shift in Sustainable Transportation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-38, September.
    7. Cheng, Qian & Liu, Pan & Xia, Qian & Cheng, Lei & Ming, Bo & Zhang, Wei & Xu, Weifeng & Zheng, Yalian & Han, Dongyang & Xia, Jun, 2023. "An analytical method to evaluate curtailment of hydro–photovoltaic hybrid energy systems and its implication under climate change," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    8. Anurag Gautam & Ibraheem & Gulshan Sharma & Mohammad F. Ahmer & Narayanan Krishnan, 2023. "Methods and Methodologies for Congestion Alleviation in the DPS: A Comprehensive Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-28, February.
    9. Bizhan Nemati & Seyed Mohammad Hassan Hosseini, 2025. "An optimal coordinated decision-making model for planning the coordinated expansion and operation of multi microgrids in active distribution network," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 6467-6505, March.
    10. Li, Xudong & Yang, Weijia & Liao, Yiwen & Zhang, Shushu & Zheng, Yang & Zhao, Zhigao & Tang, Maojia & Cheng, Yongguang & Liu, Pan, 2024. "Short-term risk-management for hydro-wind-solar hybrid energy system considering hydropower part-load operating characteristics," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 360(C).
    11. Simona Di Fraia & Rafał Figaj & Musannif Shah & Laura Vanoli, 2024. "Biomass-Driven Polygeneration Coupled to Power-to-X: An Energy and Economic Comparison Between On-Site Electric Vehicle Charging and Hydrogen Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-24, November.
    12. Aktas, Ahmet & Erhan, Koray & Özdemir, Sule & Özdemir, Engin, 2018. "Dynamic energy management for photovoltaic power system including hybrid energy storage in smart grid applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 72-82.
    13. Karimi, Hamid & Jadid, Shahram, 2020. "Optimal energy management for multi-microgrid considering demand response programs: A stochastic multi-objective framework," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    14. Keyong Hu & Qingqing Yang & Lei Lu & Yu Zhang & Shuifa Sun & Ben Wang, 2025. "Two-Stage Distributionally Robust Optimal Scheduling for Integrated Energy Systems Considering Uncertainties in Renewable Generation and Loads," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-30, April.
    15. Mehrjerdi, Hasan & Hemmati, Reza, 2020. "Coordination of vehicle-to-home and renewable capacity resources for energy management in resilience and self-healing building," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 568-579.
    16. Dagoumas, Athanasios S. & Koltsaklis, Nikolaos E., 2019. "Review of models for integrating renewable energy in the generation expansion planning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 1573-1587.
    17. Yongjie Yang & Yulong Li & Yan Cai & Hui Tang & Peng Xu, 2024. "Data-Driven Golden Jackal Optimization–Long Short-Term Memory Short-Term Energy-Consumption Prediction and Optimization System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-20, July.
    18. Zhang, Juntao & Cheng, Chuntian & Yu, Shen & Su, Huaying, 2022. "Chance-constrained co-optimization for day-ahead generation and reserve scheduling of cascade hydropower–variable renewable energy hybrid systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    19. Liu, Zhi-Feng & Zhao, Shi-Xiang & Zhang, Xi-Jia & Tang, Yu & You, Guo-Dong & Li, Ji-Xiang & Zhao, Shuang-Le & Hou, Xiao-Xin, 2023. "Renewable energy utilizing and fluctuation stabilizing using optimal dynamic grid connection factor strategy and artificial intelligence-based solution method," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(P1).
    20. Li, Rui & Wang, Wei & Wu, Xuezhi & Tang, Fen & Chen, Zhe, 2019. "Cooperative planning model of renewable energy sources and energy storage units in active distribution systems: A bi-level model and Pareto analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 30-42.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7830-:d:1473855. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.