IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i17p7755-d1472515.html

Spatiotemporal Modeling of Rural Agricultural Land Use Change and Area Forecasts in Historical Time Series after COVID-19 Pandemic, Using Google Earth Engine in Peru

Author

Listed:
  • Segundo G. Chavez

    (Instituto de Investigación para el Desarrollo Sustentable de Ceja de Selva (INDES-CES), Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza de Amazonas, 342 Higos Urco, Chachapoyas 01001, Peru)

  • Jaris Veneros

    (Instituto de Investigación para el Desarrollo Sustentable de Ceja de Selva (INDES-CES), Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza de Amazonas, 342 Higos Urco, Chachapoyas 01001, Peru)

  • Nilton B. Rojas-Briceño

    (Grupo de Investigación en Ciencia de la Información Geoespacial, Instituto de Investigación para el Desarrollo del Perú, Universidad Nacional de Moquegua, Pacocha 18610, Peru)

  • Manuel Oliva-Cruz

    (Instituto de Investigación para el Desarrollo Sustentable de Ceja de Selva (INDES-CES), Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza de Amazonas, 342 Higos Urco, Chachapoyas 01001, Peru)

  • Grobert A. Guadalupe

    (Instituto de Investigación para el Desarrollo Sustentable de Ceja de Selva (INDES-CES), Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza de Amazonas, 342 Higos Urco, Chachapoyas 01001, Peru)

  • Ligia García

    (Instituto de Investigación para el Desarrollo Sustentable de Ceja de Selva (INDES-CES), Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza de Amazonas, 342 Higos Urco, Chachapoyas 01001, Peru
    Facultad de Ingeniería Zootecnista, Agronegocios y Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza de Amazonas, 342 Higos Urco, Chachapoyas 01001, Peru)

Abstract

Despite the importance of using digital technologies for resource management, Peru does not record current and estimated processed data on rural agriculture, hindering an effective management process combined with policy. This research analyzes the connotation of spatiotemporal level trends of eight different land cover types in nine rural districts representative of the three natural regions (coast, highlands, and jungle) of Peru. The effect of change over time of the COVID-19 pandemic was emphasized. Then, forecast trends of agricultural areas were estimated, approximating possible future trends in a post-COVID-19 scenario. Landsat 7, Landsat 8, and Sentinel 2 images (2017–2022) processed in the Google Earth Engine platform (GEE) and adjusted by random forest, Kappa index, and Global Accuracy. To model the forecasts for 2027, the best-fit formula was chosen according to the criteria of the lowest precision value of the mean absolute percentage error, the mean absolute deviation, and the mean squared deviation. In the three natural regions, but not in all districts, all cover types suggested in the satellite images were classified. We found advantageous situations of agricultural area dynamics (2017–2022) for the coast of up to 80.92 km 2 (Guadalupe, 2022), disadvantageous situations for the Sierra, and indistinct situations for the Selva: between −91.52 km 2 (Villa Rica, 2022) and 22.76 km 2 (Santa Rosa, 2022). The trend analysis allows us to confirm the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the extension dedicated to agriculture. The area dedicated to agriculture in the Peruvian coast experienced a decrease; in the highlands, it increased, and in the jungle, the changes were different for the districts studied. It is expected that these results will allow progress in the fulfillment of the 2030 Agenda in its goals 1, 2, and 17.

Suggested Citation

  • Segundo G. Chavez & Jaris Veneros & Nilton B. Rojas-Briceño & Manuel Oliva-Cruz & Grobert A. Guadalupe & Ligia García, 2024. "Spatiotemporal Modeling of Rural Agricultural Land Use Change and Area Forecasts in Historical Time Series after COVID-19 Pandemic, Using Google Earth Engine in Peru," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-19, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7755-:d:1472515
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7755/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7755/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beaman, Lori & Dillon, Andrew, 2012. "Do household definitions matter in survey design? Results from a randomized survey experiment in Mali," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 124-135.
    2. Ziqi Meng & Jinwei Dong & Erle C. Ellis & Graciela Metternicht & Yuanwei Qin & Xiao-Peng Song & Sara Löfqvist & Rachael D. Garrett & Xiaopeng Jia & Xiangming Xiao, 2023. "Post-2020 biodiversity framework challenged by cropland expansion in protected areas," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 6(7), pages 758-768, July.
    3. Fritz, Steffen & See, Linda & Bayas, Juan Carlos Laso & Waldner, François & Jacques, Damien & Becker-Reshef, Inbal & Whitcraft, Alyssa & Baruth, Bettina & Bonifacio, Rogerio & Crutchfield, Jim & Rembo, 2019. "A comparison of global agricultural monitoring systems and current gaps," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 258-272.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sylvain Dessy & Luca Tiberti & Marco Tiberti & David Zoundi, 2024. "Coping with Drought in Village Economies: The Role of Polygyny," Working Papers - Economics wp2024_13.rdf, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Scienze per l'Economia e l'Impresa.
    2. D'Souza, Anna & Tandon, Sharad, "undated". "Using Household and Intrahousehold Data To Assess Food Insecurity: Evidence from Bangladesh," Economic Research Report 262207, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Cao, Yue & Fang, Chuanglin & Li, Guangdong & Feng, Yuxue & Li, Luhan & Sun, Jianfeng, 2026. "Asymmetric thermal effects of urban vegetation greening and browning," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    4. De Clercq, Djavan & Mahdi, Adam, 2024. "Feasibility of machine learning-based rice yield prediction in India at the district level using climate reanalysis and remote sensing data," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    5. Li, Qiang & Jiang, Wanting & Gao, Wei & Lyu, Junxiao, 2025. "How to build a framework for soil health of cultivated land assessment and monitoring: Insights from the perspective of government assistance to smallholders," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    6. Peterson-Wilhelm, Bailey & Schwab, Benjamin, 2024. "How does recall bias in farm labor impact separability tests?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    7. Clark, Robert & Dahlhaus, Peter & Robinson, Nathan & Larkins, Jo-ann & Morse-McNabb, Elizabeth, 2023. "Matching the model to the available data to predict wheat, barley, or canola yield: A review of recently published models and data," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    8. Guangdong Li & Chuanglin Fang & James E. M. Watson & Siao Sun & Wei Qi & Zhenbo Wang & Jianguo Liu, 2024. "Mixed effectiveness of global protected areas in resisting habitat loss," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    9. Samphantharak, Krislert & Townsend, Robert M., 2012. "Measuring the return on household enterprise: What matters most for whom?," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 58-70.
    10. Lu, Yongquan & Liu, Guilin & Xian, Yuyang & Tang, Jiaqi & Zhong, Liming, 2024. "Climate change brings both opportunities and challenges to rural revitalization in China: Evidence from apple geographical indication predictions," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    11. Delis, Manthos & Galariotis, Emilios & Monne, Jerome, 2021. "Financial vulnerability and seeking expert advice: Evidence from a survey experiment," MPRA Paper 107095, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Bau, Natalie, 2019. "Can Policy Change Culture? Government Pension Plans and Traditional Kinship Practices," CEPR Discussion Papers 13486, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    13. Ali Raza, 2019. "Credit demand among small farmers: a district level approach, Pakistan," Asian Journal of Agriculture and rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 9(1), pages 47-61, June.
    14. Hendrik Boogaard & Arun Kumar Pratihast & Juan Carlos Laso Bayas & Santosh Karanam & Steffen Fritz & Kristof Van Tricht & Jeroen Degerickx & Sven Gilliams, 2023. "Building a community-based open harmonised reference data repository for global crop mapping," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(7), pages 1-16, July.
    15. Pan, Meixi & Tang, Zishu & Zhao, Guishen, 2025. "Organic farming enhances the synergy of the water-energy-food-ecology nexus," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    16. Mary Di Santolo & Isabelle Guérin & Sébastien Michiels & Cécile Mouchel & Arnaud Natal & Christophe Nordman & Govindan Venkatasubramanian, 2024. "Ten years in Tamil Nadu : exploring labour, migration and debt from longitudinal household surveys in South India," Working Papers hal-04708806, HAL.
    17. Wu, Chen & Ma, Bingran & Feng, Chunting & Zhao, Weiyang & Wang, Wei, 2025. "Changes and drivers of terrestrial ecosystems in protected areas of China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    18. Enoch Mutebi Kikulwe & Stanslus Okurut & Susan Ajambo & Kephas Nowakunda & Dietmar Stoian & Diego Naziri, 2018. "Postharvest Losses and their Determinants: A Challenge to Creating a Sustainable Cooking Banana Value Chain in Uganda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, July.
    19. Irina Pilvere & Aleksejs Nipers & Agnese Krievina & Ilze Upite & Daniels Kotovs, 2022. "LASAM Model: An Important Tool in the Decision Support System for Policymakers and Farmers," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-26, May.
    20. Gábor Bakó & Zsolt Molnár & Lilla Bakk & Ferenc Horváth & Luca Fehér & Örs Ábrám & Edina Morvai & Csaba Biro & Gergely Pápay & Attila Fűrész & Károly Penksza & Diána Pácsonyi & Krisztina Demény & Erik, 2021. "Toward a High Spatial Resolution Aerial Monitoring Network for Nature Conservation—How Can Remote Sensing Help Protect Natural Areas?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-27, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7755-:d:1472515. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.