IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i17p7517-d1467749.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Barriers to Digital Services Trade and Export Efficiency of Digital Services

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaomei Wang

    (Business School, Shandong University, Weihai 264209, China
    Free Trade Zone Research Institute, Shandong University, Weihai 264209, China)

  • Jia Zhang

    (School of Economics, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China)

  • Yixin Zhu

    (Business School, Shandong University, Weihai 264209, China)

Abstract

An international rules system on digital trade that can satisfy multilateral interest appeal has not been formed yet despite the rapid growth of digital services trade. Using the panel data of 39 countries from 2010 to 2019, this study applied the stochastic frontier gravity model to analyze the influence of five types of barriers to digital services trade on the export efficiency of digital services. The research results show that infrastructure and connectivity barriers had no significant effect on the export efficiency of digital services. The barriers to electronic transactions and other barriers that affected the trade of digital services were conducive to improving the export efficiency of digital services. In contrast, the barriers to payment systems and intellectual property rights had a restraining effect on the export efficiency of digital services. The results also show that most countries were more efficient when exporting digital services to their major trade partner countries, which indicates a demand-driven characteristic. Based on these conclusions, we propose five recommendations that are helpful to enhance the export efficiency of digital services.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaomei Wang & Jia Zhang & Yixin Zhu, 2024. "Barriers to Digital Services Trade and Export Efficiency of Digital Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-14, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7517-:d:1467749
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7517/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7517/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Janos Ferencz, 2019. "The OECD Digital Services Trade Restrictiveness Index," OECD Trade Policy Papers 221, OECD Publishing.
    2. Teresa C. Fort, 2017. "Technology and Production Fragmentation: Domestic versus Foreign Sourcing," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 84(2), pages 650-687.
    3. Janos Ferencz & Frédéric Gonzales, 2019. "Barriers to trade in digitally enabled services in the G20," OECD Trade Policy Papers 232, OECD Publishing.
    4. Potluri, Sai Rakshith & Sridhar, V & Rao, Shrisha, 2020. "Effects of data localization on digital trade: An agent-based modeling approach," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(9).
    5. Yu, Huan & Yao, Li, 2024. "The impact of digital trade regulation on the manufacturing position in the GVC," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    6. Gupta, Shagufta & Ghosh, Poulomi & Sridhar, V., 2022. "Impact of data trade restrictions on IT services export: A cross-country analysis," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(9).
    7. Anderson, James E, 1979. "A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 69(1), pages 106-116, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiaole Deng & Fang Zhang & Shuyi Lin & Wei Qiu, 2024. "Research on the Structural Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Digital Service Trade Networks in RCEP Member States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-22, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yu, Huan & Yao, Li, 2024. "The impact of digital trade regulation on the manufacturing position in the GVC," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    2. Jinke Li & Fang Wang, 2024. "A Study on the Competitiveness and Influencing Factors of the Digital Service Trade," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-21, April.
    3. Slok-Wodkowska Magdalena & Mazur Joanna, 2021. "The EU's regional trade agreements: How the EU addresses challenges related to digital transformation," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 57(2), pages 105-120, June.
    4. Shuang Hao & Zhi Chen & Chien-Chih Wang & Che-Yu Hung, 2023. "Impact of Digital Service Trade Barriers and Cross-Border Digital Service Inputs on Economic Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-20, October.
    5. Nilanjan Banik & John Gilbert, 2010. "Regional Integration and Trade Costs in South Asia," Chapters, in: Douglas H. Brooks & Susan F. Stone (ed.), Trade Facilitation and Regional Cooperation in Asia, chapter 4, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Karlsson, Martin & Nilsson, Therese & Pichler, Stefan, 2012. "What Doesn't Kill You Makes You Stronger? The Impact of the 1918 Spanish Flu Epidemic on Economic Performance in Sweden," Working Paper Series 911, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    7. Bühler, Mathias, 2024. "Who Benefits from Free Trade?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    8. Subrata Ghatak & Andromachi S. Piperakis, 2007. "The impact of Eastern European immigration to UK trade," Economics Discussion Papers 2007-3, School of Economics, Kingston University London.
    9. David Law & Murat Genç & John Bryant, 2013. "Trade, Diaspora and Migration to New Zealand," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(5), pages 582-606, May.
    10. V. I. Blanutsa, 2022. "Geographic Research of the Platform Economy: Existing and Potential Approaches," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 133-142, June.
    11. Markus Brueckner & Ngo Van Long & Joaquin L. Vespignani, 2020. "Non-Gravity Trade," Globalization Institute Working Papers 388, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.
    12. Walid Hejazi, 2005. "Are Regional Concentrations of OECD Exports and Outward FDI Consistent with Gravity?," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 33(4), pages 423-436, December.
    13. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/6apm7lruv088iagm4rv2c33jtg is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Michael Knuchel, 2018. "Comparing estimation methods of trade costs," Aussenwirtschaft, University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science, Swiss Institute for International Economics and Applied Economics Research, vol. 69(01), pages 81-106, December.
    15. Wang, Hao & Han, Yonghui & Fidrmuc, Jan & Wei, Dongming, 2021. "Confucius Institute, Belt and Road Initiative, and Internationalization," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 237-256.
    16. Agostino Capponi & Zhaonan Qu, 2025. "Handling Sparse Non-negative Data in Finance," Papers 2509.01478, arXiv.org.
    17. Virag-Neumann, Ildiko, 2015. "Impacts of EU Enlargement Process: A Gravity Model Approach," Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference (2015), Kotor, Montengero, in: Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference, Kotor, Montengero, 10-11 September 2015, pages 453-460, IRENET - Society for Advancing Innovation and Research in Economy, Zagreb.
    18. Schaak, Henning, 2015. "The Impact of Free Trade Agreements on International Agricultural Trade: A Gravity Application on the Dairy Product Trade and the ASEAN-China-FTA," 55th Annual Conference, Giessen, Germany, September 23-25, 2015 211619, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    19. Karlsson, Martin & Nilsson, Therese & Pichler, Stefan, 2014. "The impact of the 1918 Spanish flu epidemic on economic performance in Sweden," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 1-19.
    20. Wu, Po-Chin & Liu, Shiao-Yen & Pan, Sheng-Chieh, 2013. "Nonlinear bilateral trade balance-fundamentals nexus: A panel smooth transition regression approach," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 318-329.
    21. -, 2021. "Recuperación económica tras la pandemia COVID-19: empoderar a América Latina y el Caribe para un mejor aprovechamiento del comercio electrónico y digital," Coediciones, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 47308 edited by Cepal.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7517-:d:1467749. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.