IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i16p6914-d1454775.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Age-Appropriate Public Seats in Comprehensive Parks and Sustainable Design Strategies Based on the Kano-Importance–Performance Analysis Model

Author

Listed:
  • Jingjing Lin

    (School of Design, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Xinyang Li

    (School of Design, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Jinghan Lin

    (School of Design, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China)

Abstract

As the proportion of the world’s elderly population continues to increase, the need for age-appropriate public facilities is rising. This study investigated the key elements affecting older people’s satisfaction with public seating in parks and proposed a sustainable design strategy based on the evaluation and analysis. An evaluation system of age-appropriate public seating containing 20 indicators was constructed. The theory of attractive quality (the Kano model) was used to classify the demand for public seating and to clarify the logical relationship between the role of each element in the satisfaction of public seating in parks. Then, a matrix analysis of importance and satisfaction was carried out with importance–performance analysis (IPA) to determine the direction of improvement. The results of both were comprehensively analyzed to determine the elements requiring critical improvement, and the order of maintenance and improvement. This research shows that public seat design should consider several key factors, including setting density, backrest support, good appearance, helping handrails, bright colors, and so on. This study provides suggestions for maintaining and improving the diversity of public seats in comprehensive parks, including sustainable resource integration and sustainable product recycling. The outcomes were expected to guide the improvement in the construction of age-appropriate public facilities in comprehensive parks within existing built-up areas and to increase the satisfaction of public seating use in comprehensive urban parks.

Suggested Citation

  • Jingjing Lin & Xinyang Li & Jinghan Lin, 2024. "Evaluation of Age-Appropriate Public Seats in Comprehensive Parks and Sustainable Design Strategies Based on the Kano-Importance–Performance Analysis Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-25, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:16:p:6914-:d:1454775
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/16/6914/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/16/6914/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Meredith Perry & Lucy Cotes & Benjamin Horton & Rebecca Kunac & Isaac Snell & Blake Taylor & Abbey Wright & Hemakumar Devan, 2021. "“Enticing” but Not Necessarily a “Space Designed for Me”: Experiences of Urban Park Use by Older Adults with Disability," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-19, January.
    2. Ali, Md. Julfikar & Rahaman, Mohidur & Hossain, Sk. Iqbal, 2022. "Urban green spaces for elderly human health: A planning model for healthy city living," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    3. Kurt Matzler & Elmar Sauerwein & Kenneth Heischmidt, 2003. "Importance-performance analysis revisited: the role of the factor structure of customer satisfaction," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 112-129, March.
    4. Yingyi Zhang & Ge Chen & Yue He & Xinyue Jiang & Caiying Xue, 2022. "Social Interaction in Public Spaces and Well-Being among Elderly Women: Towards Age-Friendly Urban Environments," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-14, January.
    5. Gordon Chih-Ming Ku & I-Wei Shang, 2020. "Using the Integrated Kano–RIPA Model to Explore Teaching Quality of Physical Education Programs in Taiwan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-13, June.
    6. Zheng Tan & Kevin Ka-Lun Lau & Adam Charles Roberts & Stessa Tzu-Yuan Chao & Edward Ng, 2019. "Designing Urban Green Spaces for Older Adults in Asian Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-23, November.
    7. Qi Zhang & Zhenhua Zheng & Dezhi Kang & Ying Zhou & Yifeng Zhang & Xu Zhang, 2023. "Prioritizing Neighbourhood Amenities to Enhance Neighbourhood Satisfaction: A Case Study in Wuhan, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-33, February.
    8. Scott E. Sampson & MICHAEL J. SHOWALTER, 1999. "The Performance-Importance Response Function: Observations and Implications," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 1-25, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Esmailpour, Javad & Aghabayk, Kayvan & Abrari Vajari, Mohammad & De Gruyter, Chris, 2020. "Importance – Performance Analysis (IPA) of bus service attributes: A case study in a developing country," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 129-150.
    2. Lai, Ivan Ka Wai & Hitchcock, Michael, 2016. "A comparison of service quality attributes for stand-alone and resort-based luxury hotels in Macau: 3-Dimensional importance-performance analysis," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 139-159.
    3. Ruey-Chyn Tsaur & Chyoug-Hwa Chen, 2018. "Sustainable Tourism Planning for Taiwanese in Administrative Effects with Respect to Chinese Arrivals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Ryglová Kateřina & Rašovská Ida & Šácha Jakub, 2017. "Rural Tourism – Evaluating the Quality of Destination," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 9(4), pages 769-788, December.
    5. Tianrong Xu & Nikmatul Adha Nordin & Ainoriza Mohd Aini, 2022. "Urban Green Space and Subjective Well-Being of Older People: A Systematic Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-29, October.
    6. Jih-Kuang Chen, 2021. "A New Approach for Diagonal Line Model of Importance-Performance Analysis: A Case Study of Tourist Satisfaction in China," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440219, January.
    7. Kateøina Mlejnková & Tomáš Dania & Ida Rašovská, 2021. "Quality of a Rural Destination: Visitor and Resident Approach," Academica Turistica - Tourism and Innovation Journal, University of Primorska Press, vol. 14(1), pages 87-99.
    8. Kai‐Chieh Hu, 2009. "Evaluating City Bus Service Based on Zone of Tolerance of Expectation and Normalized Importance," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(2), pages 195-217, March.
    9. Harman Preet Singh & Mohammad Alshallaqi & Mohammed Altamimi, 2023. "Predicting Critical Factors Impacting Hotel Online Ratings: A Comparison of Religious and Commercial Destinations in Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-25, August.
    10. Maciej Kozlowski & Jerzy Korzeniewski & Agnieszka Piotrowska-Piatek, 2025. "Importance-Performance Analysis Based on Text Mining," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 450-470.
    11. Chen, Kuan-Yu, 2014. "Improving importance-performance analysis: The role of the zone of tolerance and competitor performance. The case of Taiwan's hot spring hotels," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 260-272.
    12. Azzopardi, Ernest & Nash, Robert, 2013. "A critical evaluation of importance–performance analysis," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 222-233.
    13. Yulu Zhao & Xinye Xu & Gangwei Cai & Zhetao Hu & Yan Hong, 2022. "Promoting Strategies for Healthy Environments in University Halls of Residence under Regular Epidemic Prevention and Control: An Importance—Performance Analysis from Zhejiang, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-19, November.
    14. Wong, R.C.P. & Szeto, W.Y., 2018. "An alternative methodology for evaluating the service quality of urban taxis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 132-140.
    15. Zhiyu Feng & Longfei Li & Jingchun Zhang & Xinqun Feng, 2024. "Towards a Communication Ecology in the Life of Rural Senior Citizens: How Rural Public Spaces Influence Community Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-23, May.
    16. Jiacong Wu & Yu Wang & Ru Zhang & Jing Cai, 2018. "An Approach to Discovering Product/Service Improvement Priorities: Using Dynamic Importance-Performance Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-26, October.
    17. Michele Preziosi & Alessia Acampora & Maria Claudia Lucchetti & Roberto Merli, 2022. "Delighting Hotel Guests with Sustainability: Revamping Importance-Performance Analysis in the Light of the Three-Factor Theory of Customer Satisfaction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-20, March.
    18. Xian Ji & Furui Shang & Chang Liu & Qinggong Kang & Rui Wang & Chenxi Dou, 2024. "Prioritizing Environmental Attributes to Enhance Residents’ Satisfaction in Post-Industrial Neighborhoods: An Application of Machine Learning-Augmented Asymmetric Impact-Performance Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-26, May.
    19. Phi-Yen Nguyen & Thomas Astell-Burt & Hania Rahimi-Ardabili & Xiaoqi Feng, 2021. "Green Space Quality and Health: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-38, October.
    20. Zhang, Wenke & Zhang, Zhichao & Wang, Tao & Nong, Tingting & Ma, Yueyao & Lee, Eric Wai Ming & Shi, Meng, 2024. "Effects of risk information on pedestrian evacuation during fire emergencies: Virtual experiments and survey," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 656(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:16:p:6914-:d:1454775. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.