IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i13p5820-d1431175.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can the UK Deliver Zero Carbon Ready Homes by 2050?

Author

Listed:
  • Lily Warren

    (Faculty of Engineering and Science, University of Greenwich, Old Royal Naval College, Park Row, London SE10 9LS, UK)

  • Ayotunde Dawodu

    (Faculty of Engineering and Science, University of Greenwich, Old Royal Naval College, Park Row, London SE10 9LS, UK)

  • Ayomikun Solomon Adewumi

    (Faculty of Engineering and Science, University of Greenwich, Old Royal Naval College, Park Row, London SE10 9LS, UK)

  • Cheng Quan

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington, Skempton Building, London SW7 2BU, UK)

Abstract

Climate change presents one of the most significant challenges facing the world in the 21st century. In 2019, the UK became the first major economy to pass laws to end its contribution to the world’s greenhouse gas emissions; parliament passed legislation requiring the UK government to achieve its carbon neutrality commitment by 2050. This will require all industries, including the housing sector, which currently contributes around 14% of the UK’s greenhouse gas emissions, to reduce their carbon emission contribution. One of the ways in which the housing sector plans to accomplish this is through delivering new zero carbon ready homes by 2050, at the latest. This study makes an innovative contribution to advancing the field of carbon neutral construction through its identification of the barriers to the UK in regards to their ability to deliver zero carbon homes (ZCH) and the provision of potential recommendations to overcome these barriers. To achieve this, a mixed-review method is used, combining a qualitative systematic analysis and a quantitative bibliometric approach. Several key barriers were identified and assigned to following key themes: legislative, socio-cultural, economic, financial, skills and knowledge, technical, industrial, environmental, and procurement factors. Legislative obstacles were found to be a primary barrier due to a lack of certainty, clarity, and clear definitions, as well as the removal and excess of government policies. Significantly, the findings reveal the under-researched impact of recent disruptive events, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, Brexit, and economic factors in the UK, opening up novel avenues for exploring their implications. Overall, this study advances industry understanding and highlights innovative directions necessary to propel the sector towards realizing the UK’s legally-binding 2050 net zero target through the development of zero carbon ready homes.

Suggested Citation

  • Lily Warren & Ayotunde Dawodu & Ayomikun Solomon Adewumi & Cheng Quan, 2024. "Can the UK Deliver Zero Carbon Ready Homes by 2050?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-25, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:13:p:5820-:d:1431175
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/13/5820/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/13/5820/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. McLeod, Robert S. & Hopfe, Christina J. & Rezgui, Yacine, 2012. "An investigation into recent proposals for a revised definition of zero carbon homes in the UK," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 25-35.
    2. Adrian Pitts, 2017. "Passive House and Low Energy Buildings: Barriers and Opportunities for Future Development within UK Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-26, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Forde, Joe & Hopfe, Christina J. & McLeod, Robert S. & Evins, Ralph, 2020. "Temporal optimization for affordable and resilient Passivhaus dwellings in the social housing sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    2. Joohyun Lee & Mardelle McCuskey Shepley & Jungmann Choi, 2021. "Analysis of Professionals’ and the General Public’s Perceptions of Passive Houses in Korea: Needs Assessment for the Improvement of the Energy Efficiency and Indoor Environmental Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-20, August.
    3. Quddus Tushar & Guomin Zhang & Satheeskumar Navaratnam & Muhammed A. Bhuiyan & Lei Hou & Filippo Giustozzi, 2023. "A Review of Evaluative Measures of Carbon-Neutral Buildings: The Bibliometric and Science Mapping Analysis towards Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-31, October.
    4. Huo, Huimin & Xu, Wei & Li, Angui & Wu, Jianlin & Guo, Jianwei, 2023. "A simple evaluation method of external Venetian blind shading performance for nearly zero energy buildings," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    5. Ramy Mahmoud & John M. Kamara & Neil Burford, 2020. "Opportunities and Limitations of Building Energy Performance Simulation Tools in the Early Stages of Building Design in the UK," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-29, November.
    6. Jisoo Shim & Doosam Song & Joowook Kim, 2018. "The Economic Feasibility of Passive Houses in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-16, October.
    7. Adrian Pitts, 2017. "Passive House and Low Energy Buildings: Barriers and Opportunities for Future Development within UK Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-26, February.
    8. Norouzi, Masoud & Haddad, Assed N. & Jiménez, Laureano & Mohajerani, Mostafa & Boer, Dieter, 2025. "Long-term decarbonization prediction of buildings accounting for temporal variations in grid and material emission factors: A case study of timber-framed passive houses in the United Kingdom," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    9. Sonja Oliveira & Elena Marco, 2018. "Role of ‘Community Spaces’ in Residents’ Adaptation to Energy-Efficient Heating Technologies—Insights from a UK Low-Energy Housing Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, March.
    10. Liu, Li & Yu, Deng, 2023. "Does volatility in natural resources commodity prices and economic performance matter for RCEP economies?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    11. Ahmed, Ahmed I. & McLeod, Robert S. & Gustin, Matej, 2021. "Forecasting underheating in dwellings to detect excess winter mortality risks using time series models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).
    12. Forde, Joe & Osmani, Mohammed & Morton, Craig, 2021. "An investigation into zero-carbon planning policy for new-build housing," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    13. Balcombe, Paul & Rigby, Dan & Azapagic, Adisa, 2014. "Investigating the importance of motivations and barriers related to microgeneration uptake in the UK," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 403-418.
    14. Maria-Mar Fernandez-Antolin & José Manuel del Río & Vincenzo Costanzo & Francesco Nocera & Roberto-Alonso Gonzalez-Lezcano, 2019. "Passive Design Strategies for Residential Buildings in Different Spanish Climate Zones," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-22, September.
    15. Thao Thi Phuong Bui & Suzanne Wilkinson & Niluka Domingo & Casimir MacGregor, 2021. "Zero Carbon Building Practices in Aotearoa New Zealand," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-16, July.
    16. Qiankun Wang & Ke Zhu & Peiwen Guo, 2024. "Theoretical Framework and Research Proposal for Energy Utilization, Conservation, Production, and Intelligent Systems in Tropical Island Zero-Carbon Building," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-23, March.
    17. Heffernan, Emma & Pan, Wei & Liang, Xi & de Wilde, Pieter, 2015. "Zero carbon homes: Perceptions from the UK construction industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 23-36.
    18. Panagiotidou, Maria & Fuller, Robert J., 2013. "Progress in ZEBs—A review of definitions, policies and construction activity," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 196-206.
    19. Jinyu Yuan & Jian Yao & Rongyue Zheng, 2023. "Characteristics and Reasons of Manual Shade Use in a Green Office Building: A Questionnaire Based Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-23, November.
    20. Rongrong Yu & Ning Gu & Michael J. Ostwald, 2022. "Architects’ Perceptions about Sustainable Design Practice and the Support Provided for This by Digital Tools: A Study in Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:13:p:5820-:d:1431175. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.