IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i13p5779-d1430293.html

A Performance and Data-Driven Method for Optimization of Traditional Courtyards

Author

Listed:
  • Zhixin Xu

    (School of Architecture, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China)

  • Xia Huang

    (School of Art and Design, Wanjiang University of Technology, Ma’anshan 243031, China)

  • Xin Zheng

    (School of Architecture, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China)

  • Ji-Yu Deng

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510080, China)

  • Bo Sun

    (School of Architecture, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China)

Abstract

As urbanization and rapid industrialization accelerate, rural areas face increasing pressure on resources and the environment, leading to challenges such as energy waste and reduced comfort. Traditional village planning and design methods are based on economic benefits and often lack consideration of climate adaptability. To address these issues, a comprehensive assessment of building and courtyard performance should be introduced early in the planning of traditional villages. This approach can better adapt the buildings to their climatic conditions. Introducing relevant performance indicators, such as outdoor comfort, indoor lighting, and building energy consumption, at the initial design stage is crucial. This article employs performance-based multi-objective optimization algorithms and machine learning techniques to investigate the design workflow of courtyards and their combinations. The goal is to enhance planners’ design efficiency in village planning by integrating data-driven and performance-driven methods. The research results show that during the performance-driven phase, by adjusting the spatial morphology and architectural parameters, the performance of the courtyard significantly improved compared to the baseline model. Energy efficiency increased by 32.3%, the physiological equivalent temperature (PET) comfort time ratio in winter was enhanced by 8.3%, and the ratio in summer increased by 3.8%. During the data-driven phase, the classification prediction accuracy of courtyard performance can reach 83%, and the F 1 score is 0.81. In the project validation phase, it has also been proven that the performance of different plans can be quickly verified. Compared to the base’s original status, the design solutions’ performance score can be improved from 59.12 to 85.62. In summary, this workflow improves the efficiency of the interaction between design decisions and performance evaluation in the conceptual stage of village planning, providing a solid foundation for promoting subsequent solutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhixin Xu & Xia Huang & Xin Zheng & Ji-Yu Deng & Bo Sun, 2024. "A Performance and Data-Driven Method for Optimization of Traditional Courtyards," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-30, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:13:p:5779-:d:1430293
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/13/5779/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/13/5779/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xingbo Yao & Shuo Han & Bart Dewancker, 2021. "Wind Environment Simulation Accuracy in Traditional Villages with Complex Layouts Based on CFD," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-21, August.
    2. Tieqiao Xiao & Lanlan Sheng & Shaojie Zhang & Licheng Zheng & Taotao Shui, 2023. "Thermal Comfort Improvement Strategies for Outdoor Spaces in Traditional Villages Based on ENVI-Met: Shimengao Village in Chizhou City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-19, July.
    3. Wang, Wei & Liu, Ke & Zhang, Muxing & Shen, Yuchi & Jing, Rui & Xu, Xiaodong, 2021. "From simulation to data-driven approach: A framework of integrating urban morphology to low-energy urban design," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 2016-2035.
    4. Pata, Ugur Korkut, 2021. "Linking renewable energy, globalization, agriculture, CO2 emissions and ecological footprint in BRIC countries: A sustainability perspective," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 197-208.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wei, Yu & Wang, Yizhi & Vigne, Samuel A. & Ma, Zhenyu, 2023. "Alarming contagion effects: The dangerous ripple effect of extreme price spillovers across crude oil, carbon emission allowance, and agriculture futures markets," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    2. Xi Liu & Yugang He & Renhong Wu, 2024. "Revolutionizing Environmental Sustainability: The Role of Renewable Energy Consumption and Environmental Technologies in OECD Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-21, January.
    3. Doppy Roy Nendissa & Atiek Iriany & Jeky Melkianus Sui & Nikmatul Khoiriyah & Onuma Suphattanakul & Worakamol Wisetsri, 2022. "The Role of Renewable and Nonrenewable Energy on Agricultural Economics in Indonesia," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 12(3), pages 352-360, May.
    4. Iftikhar Yasin & Nawaz Ahmad & Saqib Amin & Nyla Sattar & Afsheen Hashmat, 2025. "Does agriculture, forests, and energy consumption foster the carbon emissions and ecological footprint? fresh evidence from BRICS economies," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(6), pages 13235-13255, June.
    5. Olanrewaju Lasabi & Andrew Swanson & Leigh Jarvis & Anuoluwapo Aluko & Arman Goudarzi, 2024. "Coordinated Hybrid Approach Based on Firefly Algorithm and Particle Swarm Optimization for Distributed Secondary Control and Stability Analysis of Direct Current Microgrids," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-28, January.
    6. Yongqin Niu, 2024. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Toward a greener energy transition: examining the effects of circular economy and carbon footprint for sustainable development," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 1-22, April.
    7. Seyed Mohammadreza Mahdavian & Fatemeh Askari & Hamed Kioumarsi & Reza Naseri Harsini & Hushang Dehghanzadeh & Behnaz Saboori, 2025. "Modeling the linkage between climate change, CH4 emissions, and land use with Iran's livestock production: A food security perspective," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 49(3), pages 2954-2977, August.
    8. Sitka, Andrzej & Szulc, Piotr & Smykowski, Daniel & Jodkowski, Wiesław, 2021. "Application of poultry manure as an energy resource by its gasification in a prototype rotary counterflow gasifier," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 422-429.
    9. Mateusz Jankiewicz, 2025. "The analysis of interconnections between the three dimensions of Sustainable Development in terms of the economy structure transformations," Discussion Papers 2025/323, Dipartimento di Economia e Management (DEM), University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
    10. Xiang Ma & Lin Ma & Rimsha Arshad & Hind Alofaysan, 2025. "Sustainable development in ASEAN: The role of trade diversification, government revenue, and natural resources," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 49(3), pages 3047-3076, August.
    11. Yugang He, 2024. "Evaluating Environmental Sustainability: The Role of Agriculture and Renewable Energy in South Korea," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, September.
    12. Pata, Ugur Korkut & Ertugrul, Hasan Murat, 2023. "Do the Kyoto Protocol, geopolitical risks, human capital and natural resources affect the sustainability limit? A new environmental approach based on the LCC hypothesis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    13. Jiangling Yu & Feng Ju & Muhammad Wahab & Ephraim Bonah Agyekum & Clement Matasane & Solomon Eghosa Uhunamure, 2022. "Estimating the Effects of Economic Complexity and Technological Innovations on CO 2 Emissions: Policy Instruments for N-11 Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-15, December.
    14. Mesut Dogan & Irina Georgescu & Hamza Çeştepe & Sevgi Sümerli Sarıgül & Havanur Ergün Tatar, 2025. "Renewable Energy Consumption and the Ecological Footprint in Denmark: Assessing the Influence of Financial Development and Agricultural Contribution," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-19, April.
    15. Tang, Yi, 2024. "Nexus of natural resource depletion, corruption and financial inclusion on bio-diversity loss: A systematic study on corrupt economies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    16. Mergoni, Anna & Dipierro, Anna Rita & Colamartino, Chiara, 2024. "European agricultural sector: The tortuous path across efficiency, sustainability and environmental risk," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    17. Juan David Alonso-Sanabria & Luis Fernando Melo-Velandia & Daniel Parra-Amado, 2023. "Connecting the Dots: Renewable Energy, Economic Growth, Reforestation, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Colombia," Borradores de Economia 1252, Banco de la Republica de Colombia.
    18. Pata, Ugur Korkut & Kartal, Mustafa Tevfik & Erdogan, Sinan & Sarkodie, Samuel Asumadu, 2023. "The role of renewable and nuclear energy R&D expenditures and income on environmental quality in Germany: Scrutinizing the EKC and LCC hypotheses with smooth structural changes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 342(C).
    19. Mustafa Tevfik Kartal & Ugur Korkut Pata, 2023. "The Function of Geopolitical Risk on Carbon Neutrality Under the Shadow of Russia-Ukraine Conflict: Evidence from Russia's Sectoral CO2 Emissions by High-Frequency Data and Quantile-Based Methods," Journal of Sustainable Development Issues (JOSDI), SDIjournals, vol. 1(1), pages 1-12, December.
    20. Mehdi Abid & Habib Sekrafi & Ramzi Farhani & Zouheyr Gheraia & Hanane Abdelli, 2024. "Do Institutional Quality and Terrorism Affect the Natural Resources Rents?," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(1), pages 76-85, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:13:p:5779-:d:1430293. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.