IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i13p5462-d1423468.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Role of Individual Environmental Consciousness in Industrial Decarbonization Transition

Author

Listed:
  • Alina Köhler

    (Department of Industrial, Organizational and Social Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany)

  • Simone Kauffeld

    (Department of Industrial, Organizational and Social Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany)

Abstract

Decarbonization leads to significant transition processes in industrial companies with the aim of achieving sustainable production. The consequences are far-reaching and can affect, among other things, the workplace and the activities of the employees. The readiness for change among employees is seen as a central success factor for the success of the transition to sustainable production. However, it has been unclear to what extent the environmental consciousness of individual employees influences how open employees are to this transition. A total of 427 employees from a company in the steel industry, currently undergoing a transition aimed at sustainable production, were surveyed. It was found that affective environmental consciousness influences the stages of the Transtheoretical Model in which employees find themselves regarding the company’s transition. The results emphasize, among other things, the importance of encouraging individual environmental consciousness in decarbonization transitions for the successful management of these transitions.

Suggested Citation

  • Alina Köhler & Simone Kauffeld, 2024. "Role of Individual Environmental Consciousness in Industrial Decarbonization Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-11, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:13:p:5462-:d:1423468
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/13/5462/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/13/5462/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Demary, Vera & Matthes, Jürgen & Plünnecke, Axel & Schaefer, Thilo, 2021. "Gleichzeitig: Wie vier Disruptionen die deutsche Wirtschaft verändern. Herausforderungen und Lösungen [All at the same time: How four disruptive forces are transforming the German economy. Challeng," IW-Studien, Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft (IW) / German Economic Institute, number 246089.
    2. Wenyao Zhang & Ruzhi Xu & Yuan Jiang & Wei Zhang, 2021. "How Environmental Knowledge Management Promotes Employee Green Behavior: An Empirical Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-15, April.
    3. Perlaviciute, G. & Steg, L., 2015. "The influence of values on evaluations of energy alternatives," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 259-267.
    4. Christine Merk & Gert Pönitzsch, 2017. "The Role of Affect in Attitude Formation toward New Technologies: The Case of Stratospheric Aerosol Injection," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(12), pages 2289-2304, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fanli Jia, 2025. "Integrating Interdisciplinary Insights into Sustainability: Psychological, Cultural, and Social Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-6, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muhammad Sadiq & Mei Kei Leong & Ansa Savad Salim & Zhou Jiayao, 2025. "Fostering entrepreneurial success through the predictive role of knowledge management, green creativity, green social behavior, dynamic capabilities, business environment and green service innovation," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-27, December.
    2. Hoti, Ferdiana & Perko, Tanja & Thijssen, Peter & Renn, Ortwin, 2021. "Who is willing to participate? Examining public participation intention concerning decommissioning of nuclear power plants in Belgium," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    3. Geis-Thöne, Wido, 2023. "Bildungsstand der Bevölkerung im europäischen Vergleich: Gute Lage, aber schwache Entwicklung in Deutschland," IW-Reports 3/2023, Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft (IW) / German Economic Institute.
    4. Gea Hoogendoorn & Bernadette Sütterlin & Michael Siegrist, 2021. "Tampering with Nature: A Systematic Review," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(1), pages 141-156, January.
    5. Dainius Genys & Ričardas Krikštolaitis & Aušra Pažėraitė, 2024. "Lithuanian Energy Security Transition: The Evolution of Public Concern and Its Socio-Economic Implications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-14, February.
    6. Saleem Rahman & Agnieszka Chwialkowska & Nazim Hussain & Waheed Akbar Bhatti & Harri Luomala, 2023. "Cross-cultural perspective on sustainable consumption: implications for consumer motivations and promotion," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 997-1016, February.
    7. Macht, Janine & Klink-Lehmann, Jeanette & Hartmann, Monika, 2023. "Don't forget the locals: Understanding citizens' acceptance of bio-based technologies," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    8. Fouladvand, Javanshir, 2022. "Behavioural attributes towards collective energy security in thermal energy communities: Environmental-friendly behaviour matters," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    9. Elspeth Spence & Emily Cox & Nick Pidgeon, 2021. "Exploring cross-national public support for the use of enhanced weathering as a land-based carbon dioxide removal strategy," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 165(1), pages 1-18, March.
    10. Janotta, Frederica & Hogreve, Jens, 2024. "Ready for take-off? The dual role of affective and cognitive evaluations in the adoption of Urban Air Mobility services," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    11. Khara Grieger & Jonathan B. Wiener & Jennifer Kuzma, 2024. "Improving risk governance strategies via learning: a comparative analysis of solar radiation modification and gene drives," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 1054-1067, December.
    12. Lindvall, Daniel & Sörqvist, Patrik & Lindeberg, Sofie & Barthel, Stephan, 2025. "The polarization of energy preferences – A study on social acceptance of wind and nuclear power in Sweden," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    13. Michael Siegrist, 2021. "Trust and Risk Perception: A Critical Review of the Literature," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(3), pages 480-490, March.
    14. Marilou Jobin & Michael Siegrist, 2020. "Support for the Deployment of Climate Engineering: A Comparison of Ten Different Technologies," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(5), pages 1058-1078, May.
    15. Marjolein C. J. Caniëls & Wim Lambrechts & Johannes (Joost) Platje & Anna Motylska-Kuźma & Bartosz Fortuński, 2021. "50 Shades of Green: Insights into Personal Values and Worldviews as Drivers of Green Purchasing Intention, Behaviour, and Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-18, April.
    16. Seungkook Roh & Jin Won Lee & Qingchang Li, 2019. "Effects of Rank-Ordered Feature Perceptions of Energy Sources on the Choice of the Most Acceptable Power Plant for a Neighborhood: An Investigation Using a South Korean Nationwide Sample," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-21, March.
    17. Patrick Sturgis & Ian Brunton-Smith & Jonathan Jackson, 2021. "Trust in science, social consensus and vaccine confidence," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 5(11), pages 1528-1534, November.
    18. Georgios Archimidis Tsalidis, 2020. "Integrating Individual Behavior Dimension in Social Life Cycle Assessment in an Energy Transition Context," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-20, November.
    19. Jakub Kubiczek & Bartłomiej Hadasik & Dominika Krawczyńska & Kornelia Przedworska & Erika Zsuzsanna Madarász & Aleksandra Ryczko, 2024. "Perspective of Created Value in Consumer Choice: Comparison of Economic and Ecological Dimensions," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(1), pages 21582440241, March.
    20. Klaus, Geraldine & Ernst, Andreas & Oswald, Lisa, 2020. "Psychological factors influencing laypersons’ acceptance of climate engineering, climate change mitigation and business as usual scenarios," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:13:p:5462-:d:1423468. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.