IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i11p4762-d1407971.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multilevel Change of Urban Green Space and Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity Analysis of Driving Factors

Author

Listed:
  • Huimin Wang

    (College of Urban and Rural Construction, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou 510225, China
    Institute of Sustainable Building and Energy Conservation, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou 510225, China
    Guangdong Lingnan Township Green Building Industrialization Engineering Technology Research Center, Guangzhou 510225, China)

  • Canrui Lin

    (College of Urban and Rural Construction, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou 510225, China)

  • Sihua Ou

    (College of Urban and Rural Construction, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou 510225, China)

  • Qianying Feng

    (College of Urban and Rural Construction, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou 510225, China)

  • Kui Guo

    (College of Urban and Rural Construction, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou 510225, China)

  • Xiaojian Wei

    (School of Surveying and Geoinformation Engineering, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China)

  • Jiazhou Xie

    (College of Urban and Rural Construction, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou 510225, China)

Abstract

Analyzing the change trend of urban green space (UGS) and exploring related driving forces can provide scientific reference for sustainable development in rapidly urbanizing areas. However, the spatial and temporal driving mechanisms of the drivers on UGS patterns at different scales are still not deeply understood. Based on the GlobeLand30 land cover data, nighttime lighting data and spatial statistics from 2000 to 2020, this study analyzed the size, shape and diversity of UGS in Guangzhou at the urban level, gradient level and township level with multiple landscape indices. Diversity means the richness of UGS patch types. The selected indices include percent of landscape (PLAND), largest path index (LPI), landscape shape index (LSI), aggregation index (AI) and Shannon’s diversity index (SHDI). The spatiotemporal heterogeneity of the drivers was then explored using the spatiotemporal weighted regression (GTWR) method. Results showed the following: (1) During 2000−2020, the total amount of UGS in Guangzhou increased slightly and then decreased gradually. UGS was mainly transferred into artificial surfaces (lands modified by human activities). (2) The UGS landscape showed a non-linear trend along the urban–rural gradient and fluctuated more in the interval of 20–60% urbanization level. PLAND, LPI and AI decreased significantly in areas with higher levels of urbanization. LSI increased and SHDI decreased significantly in areas with lower levels of urbanization. At township level, the landscape indices showed significant spatial autocorrelation. They transformed from discrete changes at the edge and at the junction of the administrative district to large-scale aggregated change, especially in northern areas. (3) The size of UGSs was mainly influenced by natural factors and population density, but their shape and diversity were mainly influenced by socio-economic factors. More regular shapes of green patches were expected in higher urbanization areas. Population agglomeration positively influenced green space patterns in the northeastern and southern regions (Zengcheng, Conghua and Nansha). Meanwhile the negative influence of urban expansion on the green space pattern in the central and southern regions decreased over time. This study contributes to an in-depth understanding of how the key factors affect the different changes of UGS with time and space and provides methodological support for the long-term zoning planning and management of UGS.

Suggested Citation

  • Huimin Wang & Canrui Lin & Sihua Ou & Qianying Feng & Kui Guo & Xiaojian Wei & Jiazhou Xie, 2024. "Multilevel Change of Urban Green Space and Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity Analysis of Driving Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-20, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:11:p:4762-:d:1407971
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/11/4762/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/11/4762/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Zimo & Peng, Jian & Xu, Zihan & Wang, Xiaoyu & Meersmans, Jeroen, 2021. "Ecosystem services supply and demand response to urbanization: A case study of the Pearl River Delta, China," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    2. Liu, Jie & Zhang, Lang & Zhang, Qingping & Li, Chao & Zhang, Guilian & Wang, Yuncai, 2022. "Spatiotemporal evolution differences of urban green space: A comparative case study of Shanghai and Xuchang in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    3. Xu, Ze & Zhang, Zhengfeng & Li, Chu, 2019. "Exploring urban green spaces in China: Spatial patterns, driving factors and policy implications," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    4. Wang, Jie & Zhang, Yuzhen & Zhang, Xiaoling & Song, Mengqiao & Ye, Jianping, 2023. "The spatio-temporal trends of urban green space and its interactions with urban growth: Evidence from the Yangtze River Delta region, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    5. Wu, Zhen & Chen, Ruishan & Meadows, Michael E. & Sengupta, Dhritiraj & Xu, Di, 2019. "Changing urban green spaces in Shanghai: trends, drivers and policy implications," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    6. Blanco Pastor, Antonio & Canniffe, Eamonn & Rosa Jiménez, Carlos Jesús, 2023. "Learning from Letchworth and Welwyn Garden City: Garden cities’ policies for the development of existing settlements in the contemporary world," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yaoyao Zhu & Gabriel Hoh Teck Ling, 2022. "A Systematic Review of Morphological Transformation of Urban Open Spaces: Drivers, Trends, and Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-22, August.
    2. Zhen Yang & Weijun Gao, 2022. "Evaluating the Coordinated Development between Urban Greening and Economic Growth in Chinese Cities during 2005 to 2019," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-25, August.
    3. Kelei Li & Wenpeng Du & Zhiqi Yang & Huimin Yan & Yutong Mu, 2024. "Spatio-Temporal Pattern of Urban Green Space in Chengdu Urban Center under Rapid Urbanization: From the Policy-Oriented Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, March.
    4. Chunyu Chen & Linglan Bi & Kuanfan Zhu, 2021. "Study on Spatial-Temporal Change of Urban Green Space in Yangtze River Economic Belt and Its Driving Mechanism," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-20, November.
    5. Wang, Ruoyu & Cao, Mengqiu & Yao, Yao & Wu, Wenjie, 2022. "The inequalities of different dimensions of visible street urban green space provision: A machine learning approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    6. Zhao, Xiaoqing & Xu, Yifei & Pu, Junwei & Tao, Junyi & Chen, Yanjun & Huang, Pei & Shi, Xinyu & Ran, Yuju & Gu, Zexian, 2024. "Achieving the supply-demand balance of ecosystem services through zoning regulation based on land use thresholds," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    7. Zakharov, Konstantin & Mizgajski, Andrzej, 2024. "Socioeconomic and political settings for the land development decreasing urban green. Inside view from Moscow," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    8. Liu, Jie & Zhang, Lang & Zhang, Qingping & Li, Chao & Zhang, Guilian & Wang, Yuncai, 2022. "Spatiotemporal evolution differences of urban green space: A comparative case study of Shanghai and Xuchang in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    9. Qian Ding & Tao Pan & Tao Lin & Chi Zhang, 2022. "Urban Land-Cover Changes in Major Cities in China from 1990 to 2015," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-15, December.
    10. Baohua Huang & Jiatong Gu & Mengfan Zhang & Zhe Feng, 2025. "Green Space Equality Is Better in Fast-Growing Cities: Evidence from 140 Cities in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-19, February.
    11. Wang, Ruoyu & Cao, Mengqiu & Yao, Yao & Wu, Wenjie, 2022. "The inequalities of different dimensions of visible street urban green space provision: a machine learning approach," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 117694, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Zhang, Yingjie & Zhang, Tianzheng & Zeng, Yingxiang & Cheng, Baodong & Li, Hongxun, 2021. "Designating National Forest Cities in China: Does the policy improve the urban living environment?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    13. Ke Wang & Ian Mell & Jeremy Carter, 2025. "Exploring the Development of Community Parks in Urban–Rural Fringe Areas in China: Expert and Policy Perspectives on Sustainable Design and Strategy Planning," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-22, July.
    14. Li, Shuoshuo & Liu, Yaobin & Wei, Guoen & Bi, Mo & He, Bao-Jie, 2024. "Carbon surplus or carbon deficit under land use transformation in China?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    15. Lee, Chien-Chiang & Wang, Fuhao & Chang, Yu-Fang, 2023. "Towards net-zero emissions: Can green bond policy promote green innovation and green space?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    16. Caoxin Chen & Shiyi Wang & Meixi Liu & Ke Huang & Qiuyi Guo & Wei Xie & Jiangjun Wan, 2025. "Beyond Linearity: Uncovering the Complex Spatiotemporal Drivers of New-Type Urbanization and Eco-Environmental Resilience Coupling in China’s Chengdu–Chongqing Economic Circle with Machine Learning," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-29, July.
    17. Xinxin Fu & Xiaofeng Wang & Jitao Zhou & Jiahao Ma, 2021. "Optimizing the Production-Living-Ecological Space for Reducing the Ecosystem Services Deficit," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, September.
    18. Hua Xia & Shidong Ge & Xinyu Zhang & Gunwoo Kim & Yakai Lei & Yang Liu, 2021. "Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Green Infrastructure in an Agricultural Peri-Urban Area: A Case Study of Baisha District in Zhengzhou, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-21, July.
    19. Yonggeng Xiong & Min Xu & Yan Zhao, 2024. "Resident Preferences for Urban Green Spaces in Response to Pandemic Public Health Emergency: A Case Study of Shanghai," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-25, April.
    20. Wei Shui & Kexin Wu & Yong Du & Haifeng Yang, 2021. "The Trade-Offs between Supply and Demand Dynamics of Ecosystem Services in the Bay Areas of Metropolitan Regions: A Case Study in Quanzhou, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:11:p:4762-:d:1407971. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.