IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2023i1p351-d1310608.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Holistic Assessment of Decarbonization Pathways of Energy-Intensive Industries Based on Exergy Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Matthias Leisin

    (Institute of Energy Economics and Rational Energy Use (IER), University of Stuttgart, 70565 Stuttgart, Germany)

  • Peter Radgen

    (Institute of Energy Economics and Rational Energy Use (IER), University of Stuttgart, 70565 Stuttgart, Germany)

Abstract

The decarbonization of the industrial sector plays a crucial role in a successful energy transition. This transformation is very costly and complex, as many of the existing production processes and plants will have to be partially or completely replaced to reduce carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions. This raises questions about how significant reductions in CO 2 emissions resulting from decarbonization will affect the use of resources to produce a certain product and the overall value of sustainability. This article considers the relationship between CO 2 reduction and the impact on the resource efficiency of an industrial production process. For this purpose, a methodology was developed that holistically assesses the decarbonization pathway of an industrial sector. This holistic assessment takes into account the energy carriers, raw materials, and auxiliary and construction materials used for the operation and building of the significant plant components and summarizes them as a total use of resources. For this purpose, the use of resources is represented by the thermodynamic quantity exergy, which takes into account both the energy and material components of a production process. The energy and material streams in a production process are balanced by applying exergetic analysis. This methodology is used for current state-of-the-art and future decarbonized production processes in order to quantify the effects of the decarbonization process. By comparing the calculated resource efficiencies, the thermodynamic impact on the sustainability of decarbonization paths can be set in relation to the amount of CO 2 saved. For validation, the developed methodology is applied to a conventional and a decarbonized ammonia production process. The conventional production route represents the production of ammonia by methane steam reforming, and the decarbonized production route is represented by synthesis gas production via water electrolysis and an air separation unit. The resource efficiency of the conventional ammonia production route, taking into account the energy sources, raw materials, construction materials, and auxiliary materials used, is 59%, producing a total of 1539 kg of CO 2 emissions per ton of ammonia. The decarbonized process has a resource efficiency of 45%, while no CO 2 emissions are produced in this manufacturing process. This means that the decarbonization of the production process reduces resource efficiency by 14%. In relation to the reduced amount of CO 2 , specific resource efficiency decreases by 9.09%/t CO2 . The decline in resource efficiency is mainly due to the high level of heat and energy recovery in the conventional process and the very electricity-intensive hydrogen production in the decarbonized production process.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthias Leisin & Peter Radgen, 2023. "Holistic Assessment of Decarbonization Pathways of Energy-Intensive Industries Based on Exergy Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2023:i:1:p:351-:d:1310608
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/1/351/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/1/351/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rivero, R. & Garfias, M., 2006. "Standard chemical exergy of elements updated," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(15), pages 3310-3326.
    2. Fellaou, S. & Bounahmidi, T., 2018. "Analyzing thermodynamic improvement potential of a selected cement manufacturing process: Advanced exergy analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 190-200.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Salih Demirkaya & Abdurrahman Ay & Coşkun Gülser & Rıdvan Kızılkaya, 2025. "Enhancing Clay Soil Productivity with Fresh and Aged Biochar: A Two-Year Field Study on Soil Quality and Wheat Yield," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Wilmer Velilla-Díaz & Johann Monroy Barrios & Jonathan Fábregas Villegas & Argemiro Palencia-Díaz, 2024. "Advanced Control Strategies for Cleaner Energy Conversion in Biomass Gasification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-16, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Razmi, Amir Reza & Hanifi, Amir Reza & Shahbakhti, Mahdi, 2023. "Design, thermodynamic, and economic analyses of a green hydrogen storage concept based on solid oxide electrolyzer/fuel cells and heliostat solar field," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    2. Carolino, Cristina Guedes & Medeiros Ferreira, João Paulo, 2013. "First and second law analyses to an energetic valorization process of biogas," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 58-64.
    3. Vitasari, Caecilia R. & Jurascik, Martin & Ptasinski, Krzysztof J., 2011. "Exergy analysis of biomass-to-synthetic natural gas (SNG) process via indirect gasification of various biomass feedstock," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 3825-3837.
    4. Gao, Jintong & Zhang, Qi & Wang, Xiaozhuang & Song, Dayong & Liu, Weiqi & Liu, Wenchao, 2018. "Exergy and exergoeconomic analyses with modeling for CO2 allocation of coal-fired CHP plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 562-575.
    5. Zhang, M. & Li, G. & Mu, H.L. & Ning, Y.D., 2011. "Energy and exergy efficiencies in the Chinese transportation sector, 1980–2009," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 770-776.
    6. Li, Zhiwei & Zhao, Yuze & Wu, Pei & Zhang, Hao & Dong, Nayang & Chang, Yuanyuan & Du, Yudong, 2024. "Enhancing efficiency and economy of hydrogen-based integrated energy system: A green dispatch approach based on exergy analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    7. Costa, Alexis & Coppitters, Diederik & Dubois, Lionel & Contino, Francesco & Thomas, Diane & De Weireld, Guy, 2024. "Energy, exergy, economic and environmental (4E) analysis of a cryogenic carbon purification unit with membrane for oxyfuel cement plant flue gas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 357(C).
    8. Li, Sheng & Jin, Hongguang & Gao, Lin & Zhang, Xiaosong, 2014. "Exergy analysis and the energy saving mechanism for coal to synthetic/substitute natural gas and power cogeneration system without and with CO2 capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 552-561.
    9. Song, Guohui & Xiao, Jun & Zhao, Hao & Shen, Laihong, 2012. "A unified correlation for estimating specific chemical exergy of solid and liquid fuels," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 164-173.
    10. Altayib, Khalid & Dincer, Ibrahim, 2024. "Development of a large-scale integrated solar-biomass thermal facility for green production of useful outputs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    11. Daissy Lorena Restrepo-Serna & Jimmy Anderson Martínez-Ruano & Carlos Ariel Cardona-Alzate, 2018. "Energy Efficiency of Biorefinery Schemes Using Sugarcane Bagasse as Raw Material," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-12, December.
    12. Zhao, Yue & Ke, Jing & Ni, Chun Chun & McNeil, Michael & Khanna, Nina Zheng & Zhou, Nan & Fridley, David & Li, Qiqiang, 2014. "A comparative study of energy consumption and efficiency of Japanese and Chinese manufacturing industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 45-56.
    13. Kumar, Laveet & Hasanuzzaman, M. & Rahim, N.A. & Islam, M.M., 2021. "Modeling, simulation and outdoor experimental performance analysis of a solar-assisted process heating system for industrial process heat," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 656-673.
    14. Rigby, Aidan & Lindley, Ben & Cullen, Jonathan, 2023. "An exergy based assessment of the efficiency of nuclear fuel cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    15. Golmohamadi, Hessam, 2022. "Demand-side management in industrial sector: A review of heavy industries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    16. Ghannadzadeh, Ali & Thery-Hetreux, Raphaële & Baudouin, Olivier & Baudet, Philippe & Floquet, Pascal & Joulia, Xavier, 2012. "General methodology for exergy balance in ProSimPlus® process simulator," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 38-59.
    17. Gollangi, Raju & K, NagamalleswaraRao, 2022. "Energy, exergy analysis of conceptually designed monochloromethane production process from hydrochlorination of methanol," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).
    18. Bilgen, Selçuk & Kaygusuz, Kamil, 2008. "The calculation of the chemical exergies of coal-based fuels by using the higher heating values," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(8), pages 776-785, August.
    19. Chen, Ruihua & Deng, Shuai & Zhao, Li & Zhao, Ruikai & Xu, Weicong, 2022. "Energy recovery from wastewater in deep-sea mining: Feasibility study on an energy supply solution with cold wastewater," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    20. Zheng, Danxing & Wu, Zhaohui & Huang, Weijia & Chen, Youhui, 2017. "Energy quality factor of materials conversion and energy quality reference system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P1), pages 768-778.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2023:i:1:p:351-:d:1310608. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.