IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i9p7290-d1134460.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Long-Term Conservation Agriculture Influences Weed Diversity, Water Productivity, Grain Yield, and Energy Budgeting of Wheat in North-Western Indo-Gangetic Plains

Author

Listed:
  • Tarun Sharma

    (Division of Agronomy, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India)

  • Tapas Kumar Das

    (Division of Agronomy, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India)

  • Pragati Pramanik Maity

    (Division of Agricultural Physics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India)

  • Sunanda Biswas

    (Division of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India)

  • Susama Sudhishri

    (Water Technology Centre, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India)

  • Prabhu Govindasamy

    (Division of Agronomy, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India)

  • Rishi Raj

    (Division of Agronomy, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India)

  • Suman Sen

    (Division of Agronomy, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India)

  • Teekam Singh

    (Division of Agronomy, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India)

  • Amrit Kumar Paul

    (ICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India)

  • Arkaprava Roy

    (Division of Agronomy, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India)

  • Subhash Babu

    (Division of Agronomy, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India)

  • Neelmani Rathi

    (Division of Agronomy, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India)

Abstract

Wheat is grown in an area totalling 31.1 million hectares in India. The North-western Indo-Gangetic Plains (IGP) constitutes the major share of area and production of wheat in India and is known as the wheat belt of India. However, sustaining wheat production under declining/lower resource-use efficiency in the existing rice–wheat cropping system has led to considerations about diversifying this system with a pigeon pea–wheat system (PWS) in the IGP of India. However, little or no information is available on the impact of CA-based PWS on weed dynamics, productivity, profitability, and resource-use efficiencies. Therefore, we studied these aspects in wheat under a long-term (~12 years) conservation agriculture (CA)-based PWS. Treatments were conventional till flatbed (CT), ZT permanent narrow beds (PNBR & PNB), broad beds (PBBR & PBB), and flat beds (PFBR & PFB) with and without residue (R) retention and different N levels (75% and 100% of the recommended N). The results showed that the Shannon–Weiner index and the Simpson dominance index were higher under the CA system in 2021–2022 than in 2010–2011 and 2015–2016, indicating a change in weed diversity over the period. Furthermore, the Sorensen similarity index showed that there was not much difference in weed diversity for 2010–2011. However, in 2015–2016 and 2021–2022 respectively, only 89% (0.89) and 62% (0.62) of weed species were common to both CT and CA systems, indicating a shift in weed species in the long-term CA system in 2021–2022. Residue retention and N dose decreased weed density at 30 days after sowing (DAS). All the CA-based (PFBR100N, PBBR100N, PNBR100N, PFBR75N, PBBR75N, and PNBR75N) treatments reduced the weed density and dry weight compared to CT at 30 DAS. Wheat grain yield and net returns increased by 11.6–14.9% and 19.4–23.8% over CT in CA treatments, of which PFBR100N and PBBR100N were superior. The PBBR100N and PBBR75N systems had water productivity significantly higher than CT. Residue retention in ZT permanent beds reduced energy productivity in CA than CT and no residue treatments. In the 12th year, CA with 75% N (PFBR75N, PBBR75N, PNBR75N) resulted in a higher partial factor productivity of N and total NPK applied. Contrast analysis showed that 75% N was comparable with 100% N on crop, water, and energy productivities and 75% N was superior to 100% N on partial factor productivity of N and total NPK. Thus, the permanent broad bed with residue and 100% N in the initial years and 75% N in later years can be adopted in the north-western IGP for better weed suppression, higher yield, profitability, and resource-use efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Tarun Sharma & Tapas Kumar Das & Pragati Pramanik Maity & Sunanda Biswas & Susama Sudhishri & Prabhu Govindasamy & Rishi Raj & Suman Sen & Teekam Singh & Amrit Kumar Paul & Arkaprava Roy & Subhash Bab, 2023. "Long-Term Conservation Agriculture Influences Weed Diversity, Water Productivity, Grain Yield, and Energy Budgeting of Wheat in North-Western Indo-Gangetic Plains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-19, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7290-:d:1134460
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7290/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7290/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chaudhary, V.P. & Singh, K.K. & Pratibha, G. & Bhattacharyya, Ranjan & Shamim, M. & Srinivas, I. & Patel, Anurag, 2017. "Energy conservation and greenhouse gas mitigation under different production systems in rice cultivation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 307-317.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Donglin & Feng, Hao & Li, Yi & Zhang, Tibin & Dyck, Miles & Wu, Feng, 2019. "Energy input-output, water use efficiency and economics of winter wheat under gravel mulching in Northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 354-366.
    2. Bakhshandeh, Esmaeil & Jamali, Mohsen & Emadi, Mostafa & Francaviglia, Rosa, 2022. "Greenhouse gas emissions and financial analysis of rice paddy production scenarios in northern Iran," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    3. Yang, Zhiyuan & Zhu, Yuemei & Zhang, Xiaoli & Liao, Qin & Fu, Hao & Cheng, Qingyue & Chen, Zongkui & Sun, Yongjian & Ma, Jun & Zhang, Jinyue & Li, Liangyu & Li, Na, 2023. "Unmanned aerial vehicle direct seeding or integrated mechanical transplanting, which will be the next step for mechanized rice production in China? —A comparison based on energy use efficiency and eco," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    4. Yang, Zhiyuan & Zhu, Yuemei & Zhang, Jinyue & Li, Xuyi & Ma, Peng & Sun, Jiawei & Sun, Yongjian & Ma, Jun & Li, Na, 2022. "Comparison of energy use between fully mechanized and semi-mechanized rice production in Southwest China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    5. Mohammadi, Ali & Cowie, Annette L. & Cacho, Oscar & Kristiansen, Paul & Anh Mai, Thi Lan & Joseph, Stephen, 2017. "Biochar addition in rice farming systems: Economic and energy benefits," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 415-425.
    6. Nisar, Shahida & Benbi, Dinesh Kumar & Toor, Amardeep Singh, 2021. "Energy budgeting and carbon footprints of three tillage systems in maize-wheat sequence of north-western Indo-Gangetic Plains," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    7. Yuan, Shen & Peng, Shaobing, 2017. "Input-output energy analysis of rice production in different crop management practices in central China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1124-1132.
    8. Paramesh, Venkatesh & Parajuli, Ranjan & Chakurkar, E.B. & Sreekanth, G.B. & Kumar, H.B. Chetan & Gokuldas, P.P. & Mahajan, Gopal R. & Manohara, K.K. & Viswanatha, Reddy K. & Ravisankar, N., 2019. "Sustainability, energy budgeting, and life cycle assessment of crop-dairy-fish-poultry mixed farming system for coastal lowlands under humid tropic condition of India," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    9. Paramesh, Venkatesh & Arunachalam, Vadivel & Nath, Arun Jyoti, 2019. "Enhancing ecosystem services and energy use efficiency under organic and conventional nutrient management system to a sustainable arecanut based cropping system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    10. Tirkey, Jeewan Vachan & Kumar, Ajeet & Singh, Deepak Kumar, 2022. "Energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions and economic feasibility studies of biodiesel production from Mahua (Madhuca longifolia) in India," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    11. Du, Xiangbei & He, Wenchang & Gao, Shangqin & Liu, Dong & Wu, Wenge & Tu, Debao & Kong, Lingcong & Xi, Min, 2022. "Raised bed planting increases economic efficiency and energy use efficiency while reducing the environmental footprint for wheat after rice production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    12. Mohammad Mizanur Rahman & Mohammed Zia Uddin Kamal & Senaratne Ranamukhaarachchi & Mohammad Saiful Alam & Mohammad Khairul Alam & Mohammad Arifur Rahman Khan & Mohammad Moshiul Islam & Mohammad Ashraf, 2022. "Effects of Organic Amendments on Soil Aggregate Stability, Carbon Sequestration, and Energy Use Efficiency in Wetland Paddy Cultivation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-14, April.
    13. Singh, Ranbir & Singh, Ajay & Sheoran, Parvender & Fagodiya, R.K. & Rai, Arvind Kumar & Chandra, Priyanka & Rani, Sonia & Yadav, Rajender Kumar & Sharma, P.C., 2022. "Energy efficiency and carbon footprints of rice-wheat system under long-term tillage and residue management practices in western Indo-Gangetic Plains in India," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PA).
    14. Parihar, C.M. & Meena, B.R. & Nayak, Hari Sankar & Patra, K. & Sena, D.R. & Singh, Raj & Jat, S.L. & Sharma, D.K. & Mahala, D.M. & Patra, S. & Rupesh, & Rathi, N. & Choudhary, M. & Jat, M.L. & Abdalla, 2022. "Co-implementation of precision nutrient management in long-term conservation agriculture-based systems: A step towards sustainable energy-water-food nexus," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PB).
    15. Venkatesh Paramesh & Parveen Kumar & Ranjan Parajuli & Rosa Francaviglia & Kallakeri Kannappa Manohara & Vadivel Arunachalam & Trivesh Mayekar & Sulekha Toraskar, 2023. "A Life Cycle Assessment of Rice–Rice and Rice–Cowpea Cropping Systems in the West Coast of India," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-14, February.
    16. Htwe, Than & Sinutok, Sutinee & Chotikarn, Ponlachart & Amin, Nowshad & Akhtaruzzaman, Md & Techato, Kuaanan & Hossain, Tareq, 2021. "Energy use efficiency and cost-benefits analysis of rice cultivation: A study on conventional and alternative methods in Myanmar," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    17. Sridhara, Shankarappa & Manoj, Konapura Nagaraja & Gopakkali, Pradeep, 2023. "A micro-level assessment of carbon equivalent greenhouse gas emission and energy budgeting of rice cultivation in India," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    18. Yadav, Gulab Singh & Das, Anup & Kandpal, B K & Babu, Subhash & Lal, Rattan & Datta, Mrinmoy & Das, Biswajit & Singh, Raghavendra & Singh, VK & Mohapatra, KP & Chakraborty, Mandakranta, 2021. "The food-energy-water-carbon nexus in a maize-maize-mustard cropping sequence of the Indian Himalayas: An impact of tillage-cum-live mulching," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    19. Yuan, Shen & Peng, Shaobing & Wang, Dong & Man, Jianguo, 2018. "Evaluation of the energy budget and energy use efficiency in wheat production under various crop management practices in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 184-191.
    20. Kumar, Rakesh & Mishra, J.S. & Mondal, Surajit & Meena, Ram Swaroop & Sundaram, P.K. & Bhatt, B.P. & Pan, R.S. & Lal, Rattan & Saurabh, Kirti & Chandra, Naresh & Samal, S.K. & Hans, Hansraj & Raman, R, 2021. "Designing an ecofriendly and carbon-cum-energy efficient production system for the diverse agroecosystem of South Asia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7290-:d:1134460. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.