IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i9p7027-d1129931.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis on the Effectiveness and Mechanisms of Public Policies to Promote Innovation of High-Tech Startups in Makerspaces

Author

Listed:
  • Youjia Li

    (School of Economics, Xinxiang University, Xinxiang 453003, China)

  • Yi Li

    (School of Business Administration, Wuhan Business University, Wuhan 430056, China)

  • Shunli Qiu

    (School of Economics & Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)

Abstract

In the context of digital transformation and the rapid development of artificial intelligence, corporate innovation has become increasingly important in leading industrial development and improving national competitiveness. In 2015, China launched a “mass entrepreneurship and innovation program”; in response to the policy, many makerspaces have been established, resulting in clusters of high-tech startups. High-tech startups are the pioneers in innovation development. However, there is still a lack of empirical evidence for whether these firms’ innovative activities, capabilities, and performance can be effectively stimulated by public policy. Drawing from the institutional theory and resource-based view, this paper develops a model of policy perception on innovation response. Using a sample of 500 startups located in the three representative makerspaces in China, this work verifies the effectiveness of innovation and entrepreneurship incentives on startups’ innovative activities, capabilities, and performance, and successfully identifies the mediating role of policy adaptation in the policy perception-innovative responses’ link and the moderating role of makerspace support.

Suggested Citation

  • Youjia Li & Yi Li & Shunli Qiu, 2023. "Analysis on the Effectiveness and Mechanisms of Public Policies to Promote Innovation of High-Tech Startups in Makerspaces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-22, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7027-:d:1129931
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7027/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7027/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard A. D'Aveni & Giovanni Battista Dagnino & Ken G. Smith, 2010. "The age of temporary advantage," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(13), pages 1371-1385, December.
    2. William Lazonick, 2010. "The Chandlerian corporation and the theory of innovative enterprise," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 19(2), pages 317-349, April.
    3. Mariana Mazzucato, 2016. "From market fixing to market-creating: a new framework for innovation policy," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 140-156, February.
    4. Li, Xin & Shao, Xuefeng & Chang, Tsangyao & Albu, Lucian Liviu, 2022. "Does digital finance promote the green innovation of China's listed companies?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    5. Zhen Sun & Zhen Lei & Zhifeng Yin, 2018. "Innovation policy in China: nationally promulgated but locally implemented," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(21), pages 1481-1486, December.
    6. David, Paul A. & Hall, Bronwyn H. & Toole, Andrew A., 2000. "Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(4-5), pages 497-529, April.
    7. Antonia Mohedano-Suanes & María-Ángeles Revilla-Camacho & Dolores Garzón, 2021. "Innovation orientation and long-term performance: The mediating role of market perception capability," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 741-757, June.
    8. Luo, Xingwu & Huang, Feifei & Tang, Xiaobo & Li, Jialong, 2021. "Government subsidies and firm performance: Evidence from high-tech start-ups in China," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    9. Jiang, Zihao & Liu, Zhiying, 2022. "Policies and exploitative and exploratory innovations of the wind power industry in China: The role of technological path dependence," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    10. Pengfei Fu & Lin Li & Xuefang Xie, 2022. "Reconstructing makerspaces in China: mass innovation space and the transformative creative industries," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-8, December.
    11. Siying Long & Zhongju Liao, 2021. "Are fiscal policy incentives effective in stimulating firms' eco‐product innovation? The moderating role of dynamic capabilities," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 3095-3104, November.
    12. David J. Teece & Gary Pisano & Amy Shuen, 1997. "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(7), pages 509-533, August.
    13. Grillitsch, Markus & Hansen, Teis & Coenen, Lars & Miörner, Johan & Moodysson, Jerker, 2019. "Innovation policy for system-wide transformation: The case of strategic innovation programmes (SIPs) in Sweden," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 1048-1061.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhou, Zhikai & Liu, Dewen & Chen, Zhongjie & Pancho, Martin, 2025. "Government adoption of generative artificial intelligence and ambidextrous innovation," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    2. Švarc, Jadranka & Dabić, Marina, 2021. "Transformative innovation policy or how to escape peripheral policy paradox in European research peripheral countries," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    3. Tea Petrin & Dragana Radicic, 2023. "Instrument policy mix and firm size: is there complementarity between R&D subsidies and R&D tax credits?," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 181-215, February.
    4. Salas Gironés, Edgar & van Est, Rinie & Verbong, Geert, 2020. "The role of policy entrepreneurs in defining directions of innovation policy: A case study of automated driving in the Netherlands," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    5. Filipe Silva & Carlos Carreira, 2012. "Do financial constraints threat the innovation process? Evidence from Portuguese firms," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(8), pages 701-736, November.
    6. Kim, Namil & Lee, Hyeokseong & Kim, Wonjoon & Lee, Hyunjong & Suh, Jong Hwan, 2015. "Dynamic patterns of industry convergence: Evidence from a large amount of unstructured data," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(9), pages 1734-1748.
    7. One-Ki (Daniel) Lee & Vallabh Sambamurthy & Kai H. Lim & Kwok Kee Wei, 2015. "How Does IT Ambidexterity Impact Organizational Agility?," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(2), pages 398-417, June.
    8. Patricio Duran & Nadine Kammerlander & Marc van Essen & Thomas Zellweger, 2016. "Doing More with Less : Innovation Input and Output in Family Firms," Post-Print hal-02276703, HAL.
    9. Grashof, Nils, 2020. "Putting the watering can away Towards a targeted (problem-oriented) cluster policy framework," Papers in Innovation Studies 2020/4, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    10. Sven Kunisch & Markus Menz & David Collis, 2020. "Corporate headquarters in the twenty-first century: an organization design perspective," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 9(1), pages 1-32, December.
    11. David J. Teece & Greg Linden, 2017. "Business models, value capture, and the digital enterprise," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 6(1), pages 1-14, December.
    12. Yan, Kai & Zhang, Ziyi & Yang, Lisi & Cao, Yuqiang & Shan, Yaowen, 2024. "Capital generates green: Evidence from China's national innovation system policy," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    13. Aalto, Eero & Gustafsson, Robin, 2020. "Innovation Promotion Rationales and Impacts – A Review," ETLA Reports 99, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    14. Thorsten Koch & Josef Windsperger, 2017. "Seeing through the network: Competitive advantage in the digital economy," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 6(1), pages 1-30, December.
    15. Yang, Yanwu & Ren, Haili & Liu, Yutong & Yang, Yusen, 2025. "Integration of technology and finance, digital transformation and corporate green innovation," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    16. Yaqun Yi & Yuan Li & Michael A. Hitt & Yi Liu & Zelong Wei, 2016. "The influence of resource bundling on the speed of strategic change: Moderating effects of relational capital," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 435-467, June.
    17. Laatsit, Mart & Grillitsch, Markus & Fünfschilling, Lea, 2025. "Great expectations: The promises and limits of innovation policy in addressing societal challenges," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(3).
    18. Elia, Stefano & Giuffrida, Maria & Mariani, Marcello M. & Bresciani, Stefano, 2021. "Resources and digital export: An RBV perspective on the role of digital technologies and capabilities in cross-border e-commerce," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 158-169.
    19. Inês Teixeira & Aurora Teixeira & Luís Santos, 2023. "R&D subsidies and Portuguese firms’ performance: A longitudinal firm-level study," GEE Papers 0173, Gabinete de Estratégia e Estudos, Ministério da Economia, revised Jul 2023.
    20. Abdulrahman Al–Aali & David J. Teece, 2014. "International Entrepreneurship and the Theory of the (Long–Lived) International Firm: A Capabilities Perspective," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 38(1), pages 95-116, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7027-:d:1129931. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.