IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i8p6774-d1125691.html

Environmental Sustainability for Strategic Planning Effectiveness and Organizational Improvement

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Mandel Gandrita

    (Universidade Europeia, Estrada da Correia, Quinta do Bom Nome, 53, 1500-210 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Ana Gandrita

    (ISCTE-IUL, Av. das Forças Armadas, 1649-026 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • David Pascoal Rosado

    (Universidade Europeia, Estrada da Correia, Quinta do Bom Nome, 53, 1500-210 Lisboa, Portugal
    CINAMIL/Academia Militar, Av. Conde Castro Guimarães, 2720-113 Amadora, Portugal)

  • Manuel do Carmo

    (CINAMIL/Academia Militar, Av. Conde Castro Guimarães, 2720-113 Amadora, Portugal
    CIMA/IIFA-University of Évora, Rua Romão Ramalho, 59, 7000-671 Evora, Portugal)

Abstract

Organizations are continuously pushed to be more competitive, with a broader strategic planning framework that deals with sustainable dilemmas and creates new demands for inclusion. This study aims to investigate the relationship between environmental responsibility and workforce retention, as well as the role of environmental responsibility in strategic planning. The findings of this research will contribute to a greater understanding of how social responsibility can improve employee retention and lead to a more efficient and effective outcome. Using a quantitative method, we surveyed n = 311 respondents and conducted a bibliometric analysis using the Web of Science and ScienceDirect databases to gather relevant information on the topic. The findings of this study will provide insights into how social responsibility can improve employee retention and enhance organizational efficiency and effectiveness. The results address the value of implementing environmental guidelines in strategic planning, the contribution of top management, and pro-environmental policies with the intention to apply them, and encourage the sharing of knowledge and best practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Mandel Gandrita & Ana Gandrita & David Pascoal Rosado & Manuel do Carmo, 2023. "Environmental Sustainability for Strategic Planning Effectiveness and Organizational Improvement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-17, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:8:p:6774-:d:1125691
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/8/6774/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/8/6774/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Morgan X. Yang & Ji Li & Irina Y. Yu & Kevin J. Zeng & Jian‐Min (James) Sun, 2019. "Environmentally sustainable or economically sustainable? The effect of Chinese manufacturing firms' corporate sustainable strategy on their green performances," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(6), pages 989-997, September.
    2. E. Tapinos & R.G. Dyson & M. Meadows, 2005. "The impact of performance measurement in strategic planning," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 54(5/6), pages 370-384, July.
    3. Titus Jr., Varkey K. & Covin, Jeffrey G. & Slevin, Dennis P., 2011. "Aligning strategic processes in pursuit of firm growth," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(5), pages 446-453, May.
    4. Ojha, Divesh & Patel, Pankaj C. & Sridharan, Sri V., 2020. "Dynamic strategic planning and firm competitive performance: A conceptualization and an empirical test," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    5. Ole Ellegaard & Johan A. Wallin, 2015. "The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(3), pages 1809-1831, December.
    6. Kennedy, Elizabeth & Daim, Tugrul U., 2010. "A strategy to assist management in workforce engagement and employee retention in the high tech engineering environment," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 468-476, November.
    7. Dibrell, Clay & Craig, Justin B. & Neubaum, Donald O., 2014. "Linking the formal strategic planning process, planning flexibility, and innovativeness to firm performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(9), pages 2000-2007.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wissal Affes & Habib Affes, 2022. "Business Model and Firm Performance in Tunisian Firms: a Mediated Moderation Analysis," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(4), pages 2822-2839, December.
    2. Fuzhen Liu & Kee-hung Lai & Wei Cai, 2021. "Responsible Production for Sustainability: Concept Analysis and Bibliometric Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-27, January.
    3. Muhammad Awais & Amanat Ali & Muhammad Sajid Khattak & Muhammad Irfanullah Arfeen & Muhammad Azam I. Chaudhary & Aleena Syed, 2023. "Strategic Flexibility and Organizational Performance: Mediating Role of Innovation," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, June.
    4. Sirén, Charlotta & Kohtamäki, Marko, 2016. "Stretching strategic learning to the limit: The interaction between strategic planning and learning," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 653-663.
    5. repec:plo:pone00:0235265 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Sujeeth Ungratwar & Dipasha Sharma & Satish Kumar, 2025. "Mapping the digital banking landscape: a multi-dimensional exploration of fintech, digital payments, and e-wallets, with insights into current scenarios and future research," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-22, December.
    7. Migliavacca, Milena & Goodell, John W. & Paltrinieri, Andrea, 2023. "A bibliometric review of portfolio diversification literature," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    8. Shalini Srivastava & Poornima Madan, 2016. "Understanding the Roles of Organizational Identification, Trust and Corporate Ethical Values in Employee Engagement–Organizational Citizenship Behaviour Relationship: A Study on Indian Managers," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 41(4), pages 314-330, November.
    9. Nuno Aluai Carvalho & Maria da Conceição Martins, 2024. "Education to Promote Healthy and Sustainable Eating Habits: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-14, November.
    10. Cihangir Kaçmaz & Osman Tayyar Çelik, 2025. "Life Satisfaction in Adolescence: A Bibliometric Analysis," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 18(5), pages 1927-1955, October.
    11. Perez-Vega, Rodrigo & Hopkinson, Paul & Singhal, Aishwarya & Mariani, Marcello M., 2022. "From CRM to social CRM: A bibliometric review and research agenda for consumer research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 1-16.
    12. Théodore Nikiema & Eugène C. Ezin & Sylvain Kpenavoun Chogou, 2023. "Bibliometric Analysis of the State of Research on Agroecology Adoption and Methods Used for Its Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-18, November.
    13. Ainun Hasanah & Jing Wu, 2025. "Bibliometric analysis and global research trends of climate change and cities studies for 30 years (1990–2021)," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 5573-5617, March.
    14. Nicole Castillo & Roberto D. Ponce Oliva & Julián Andrés Diaz Tautiva, 2024. "Charting the Path: Unraveling the Research on Organizations and Certification Schemes (1999–2022)," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(4), pages 21582440241, December.
    15. Mehdi Toloo & Rouhollah Khodabandelou & Amar Oukil, 2022. "A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis of Fractional Programming (1965–2020)," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-21, May.
    16. Manta Eduard Mihai & Davidescu Adriana Ana Maria & Geambasu Maria Cristina & Florescu Margareta Stela, 2023. "Exploring the research area of direct taxation. An empirical analysis based on bibliometric analysis results," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 18(s1), pages 355-383, December.
    17. Satish Kumar & Dipasha Sharma & Sandeep Rao & Weng Marc Lim & Sachin Kumar Mangla, 2025. "Past, present, and future of sustainable finance: insights from big data analytics through machine learning of scholarly research," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 345(2), pages 1061-1104, February.
    18. Albiona Pestisha & Zoltán Gabnai & Aidana Chalgynbayeva & Péter Lengyel & Attila Bai, 2023. "On-Farm Renewable Energy Systems: A Systematic Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-25, January.
    19. Maria Denisa Vasilescu & Simona Andreea Apostu & Eva Militaru & Eglantina Hysa, 2022. "Public Opinion on European Health Policy, Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-17, April.
    20. Morgan X. Yang & Xuan Tang & Man Lai Cheung & Ying Zhang, 2021. "An institutional perspective on consumers' environmental awareness and pro‐environmental behavioral intention: Evidence from 39 countries," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 566-575, January.
    21. Shaunak Roy & Shivaji Banerjee, 2025. "Trajectories of Brand Personality Research since the New Millennium: A Bibliometric Analysis," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 14(2), pages 151-172, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:8:p:6774-:d:1125691. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.