IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i8p6350-d1118104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Privatisation in Sustaining Auditor Independence: Evidence from the Developing Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Abdul Rahman Al Natour

    (Department of Accounting, Faculty of Administrative & Financial Sciences, University of Petra, Amman 11196, Jordan)

  • Naim Salameh Al-Qadi

    (Amman University College for Financial and Administrative Sciences, Al-Balqa Applied University, Salt 19117, Jordan)

  • Rasmi Meqbel

    (Department of Accounting, Business School, The Hashemite University, Zarqa 13133, Jordan)

  • Hala Zaidan

    (Department of Accounting, School of Business, The University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan)

  • Hamzah Al-Mawali

    (Department of Accounting, School of Business, The University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan)

  • Manaf Al-Okaily

    (Department of Accounting, School of Business, Jadara University, Irbid 21111, Jordan)

Abstract

This paper investigates the role of structural ownership reforms in sustaining auditor independence through split-share structure reform (SSSR). Studying a sample of 1826 Chinese listed firms over the SSSR period in China, the results showed that auditor independence sustainability was less pronounced in local state-owned enterprises (LSOEs) compared with non-state-owned Enterprises (NSOEs). Nevertheless, after the SSSR, there is a significant enhancement in sustaining auditor independence. In particular, auditor independence sustainability is pronounced by providing an unqualified audit opinion, including an ‘emphasis of matter paragraph’ instead of issuing a modified audit opinion. This study contributes to the literature in two ways. First, it gives an empirical investigation into auditor independence sustainability efforts by the Chinese government through the SSSR. Second, it helps regulators and policy-makers in China and other emerging markets in evaluating the SSSR efforts to improve auditor independence.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdul Rahman Al Natour & Naim Salameh Al-Qadi & Rasmi Meqbel & Hala Zaidan & Hamzah Al-Mawali & Manaf Al-Okaily, 2023. "The Role of Privatisation in Sustaining Auditor Independence: Evidence from the Developing Markets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-17, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:8:p:6350-:d:1118104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/8/6350/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/8/6350/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Manaf Al-Okaily & Abdul Rahman Al Natour & Farah Shishan & Ahmed Al-Dmour & Rasha Alghazzawi & Malek Alsharairi, 2021. "Sustainable FinTech Innovation Orientation: A Moderated Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Abdul Rahman Al Natour & Rasmi Meqbel & Salah Kayed & Hala Zaidan, 2022. "The Role of Sustainability Reporting in Reducing Information Asymmetry: The Case of Family- and Non-Family-Controlled Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-17, May.
    3. Madher E. Hamdallah & Salem Al-N’eimat & Anan F. Srouji & Manaf Al-Okaily & Khaldoon Albitar, 2022. "The Effect of Apparent and Intellectual Sustainability Independence on the Credibility Gap of the Accounting Information," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-22, November.
    4. Edward C. Norton & Hua Wang & Chunrong Ai, 2004. "Computing interaction effects and standard errors in logit and probit models," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 4(2), pages 154-167, June.
    5. Lufei Ruan & Haiyan Zhang, 2021. "Do auditors consider alleged bribery when accepting clients? Evidence from Chinese non-state-owned enterprises," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(6-7), pages 744-776, November.
    6. Wong, T. J., 2016. "Corporate Governance Research on Listed Firms in China: Institutions, Governance and Accountability," Foundations and Trends(R) in Accounting, now publishers, vol. 9(4), pages 259-326, March.
    7. Ai, Chunrong & Norton, Edward C., 2003. "Interaction terms in logit and probit models," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 80(1), pages 123-129, July.
    8. Francis, Jere R., 2004. "What do we know about audit quality?," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 345-368.
    9. Feng Chen & Songlan Peng & Shuang Xue & Zhifeng Yang & Feiteng Ye, 2016. "Do Audit Clients Successfully Engage in Opinion Shopping? Partner‐Level Evidence," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(1), pages 79-112, March.
    10. DeAngelo, Linda Elizabeth, 1981. "Auditor size and audit quality," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(3), pages 183-199, December.
    11. Firth, Michael & Rui, Oliver M. & Wu, Xi, 2012. "How Do Various Forms of Auditor Rotation Affect Audit Quality? Evidence from China," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 109-138.
    12. Wenjun Wen & Christopher Humphrey & Amanda Sonnerfeldt, 2021. "The strategic significance of the CICPA in the making of a Chinese home-grown public accounting profession," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(6-7), pages 636-676, November.
    13. Wang, Qian & Wong, T.J. & Xia, Lijun, 2008. "State ownership, the institutional environment, and auditor choice: Evidence from China," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 112-134, September.
    14. DeFond, Mark & Zhang, Jieying, 2014. "A review of archival auditing research," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 275-326.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adewumi Ayodeji Davidson & Fakunle Isaiah Omotayo & Bamidele Matthew Mayor & Akomolehin Israel Akinwale, 2024. "Impact of Auditor’s Independence on Earnings Management of Listed Deposit Money Banks in Nigeria," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(1), pages 1658-1670, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Beatriz García Osma & Belén Gill de Albornoz Noguer & Elena De las Heras Cristobal, 2016. "Opinion shopping: Partner versus firm-level evidence," Working Papers. Serie EC 2016-02, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
    2. Xingqiang Du, 2019. "Does CEO-Auditor Dialect Sharing Impair Pre-IPO Audit Quality? Evidence from China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 156(3), pages 699-735, May.
    3. Xiong, Hao & Hou, Fei & Li, Hanwen & Wang, Huabing, 2020. "Does rice farming shape audit quality: Evidence from signing auditors level analysis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 403-420.
    4. Omrane Guedhami & Jeffrey A. Pittman & Walid Saffar, 2014. "Auditor Choice in Politically Connected Firms," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(1), pages 107-162, March.
    5. Sanoran, Kanyarat (Lek), 2018. "Auditors’ going concern reporting accuracy during and after the global financial crisis," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 164-178.
    6. Ku He & Xiaofei Pan & Gary Tian, 2017. "Legal Liability, Government Intervention, and Auditor Behavior: Evidence from Structural Reform of Audit Firms in China," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 61-95, January.
    7. Yangyang Chen & Jun Huang & Ting Li & Jeffrey Pittman, 2022. "It's a Small World: The Importance of Social Connections with Auditors to Mutual Fund Managers’ Portfolio Decisions," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(3), pages 901-963, June.
    8. Zhang, Xuehua & Yan, Huanmin & Hu, Fang & Wang, Hongjian & Li, Xiaoning, 2022. "Effect of auditor rotation violation on audit opinions and audit fees: Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    9. Nguyen, Lily & Vu, Le & Yin, Xiangkang, 2020. "The undesirable effect of audit quality: Evidence from firm innovation," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(6).
    10. Kristian D. Allee & Daniel D. Wangerin, 2018. "Auditor monitoring and verification in financial contracts: evidence from earnouts and SFAS 141(R)," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 1629-1664, December.
    11. Mo, Phyllis L.L. & Rui, Oliver M. & Wu, Xi, 2015. "Auditors' going Concern Reporting in the pre- and post-bankruptcy Law Eras: Chinese Affiliates of Big 4 Versus Local Auditors," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 1-30.
    12. Pan, Yue & Shroff, Nemit & Zhang, Pengdong, 2023. "The dark side of audit market competition," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(1).
    13. Rita Lamboglia & Daniela Mancini, 2021. "The relationship between auditors’ human capital attributes and the assessment of the control environment," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 25(4), pages 1211-1239, December.
    14. repec:mth:ijafr8:v:9:y:2019:i:1:p:450-461 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Christensen, Brant E. & Newton, Nathan J. & Wilkins, Michael S., 2021. "How do team workloads and team staffing affect the audit? Archival evidence from U.S. audits," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    16. Ji, Xu-dong & Lu, Wei & Qu, Wen, 2018. "Internal control risk and audit fees: Evidence from China," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 266-287.
    17. Anna Alon & Oksana Kim, 2022. "Protectionism through legislative layering: Implications for auditors and investors," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(3), pages 363-383, September.
    18. Bandyopadhyay, Sati P. & Chen, Changling & Yu, Yingmin, 2014. "Mandatory audit partner rotation, audit market concentration, and audit quality: Evidence from China," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 18-31.
    19. Timothy B. Bell & Monika Causholli & W. Robert Knechel, 2015. "Audit Firm Tenure, Non‐Audit Services, and Internal Assessments of Audit Quality," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(3), pages 461-509, June.
    20. Fakhroddin MohammadRezaei & Omid Faraji & Zabihollah Rezaee & Reza Gholami-Jamkarani & Mehdi Yari, 2024. "Substantive or symbolic compliance with regulation, audit fees and audit quality," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(1), pages 32-51, March.
    21. Kevin Koh & Li Li & Xuejiao Liu & Chunfei Wang, 2023. "The Effect of Audit Partner Diversity on Audit Quality: Evidence from China," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 59(1), pages 340-380, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:8:p:6350-:d:1118104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.