IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i6p5557-d1103831.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the Influence of E-Learning Quality on the Intention to Continue E-Learning: Evidence from SEM and fsQCA

Author

Listed:
  • Hao Zheng

    (Department of Education Information Technology, Faculty of Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China)

  • Yu Qian

    (Department of Education Information Technology, Faculty of Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China)

  • Zongran Wang

    (Department of Education Information Technology, Faculty of Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China)

  • Yonghe Wu

    (Department of Education Information Technology, Faculty of Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China)

Abstract

This study explores how Chinese college students perceive the quality of e-learning and its impact on their adoption of online learning. The study develops an impact model of e-learning quality on continuous learning intention based on the stimulus-organism-response framework, technology acceptance model, and information system success model. The model is validated using a structural equation model (SEM) and fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) with data collected from 253 college students at a university in Eastern China. The SEM analysis shows that perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness positively influence e-learning continuance intention, while system quality and personalization have a positive impact on perceived ease of use, and learning community positively impacts perceived usefulness. The fsQCA analysis shows that college students’ willingness to continue e-learning is not solely dependent on a single factor of e-learning service quality but is also influenced by the interaction between various factors. Therefore, e-learning providers should take into account both external stimuli and internal perception factors when designing e-learning services. The findings of this study have practical implications for improving e-learning quality and enhancing the online learning experience. E-learning providers should consider the importance of system quality, personalization, and learning community in improving perceived ease of use and usefulness, which in turn can increase students’ intention to continue e-learning. The study also highlights the importance of considering the interaction between various factors that influence e-learning adoption rather than relying solely on individual factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Hao Zheng & Yu Qian & Zongran Wang & Yonghe Wu, 2023. "Research on the Influence of E-Learning Quality on the Intention to Continue E-Learning: Evidence from SEM and fsQCA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-14, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5557-:d:1103831
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5557/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5557/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Long Pham & Stan Williamson & Ronald Berry, 2018. "Student Perceptions of E-Learning Service Quality, E-Satisfaction, and E-Loyalty," International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems (IJEIS), IGI Global, vol. 14(3), pages 19-40, July.
    2. Afonso, Carolina & Silva, Graça Miranda & Gonçalves, Helena Martins & Duarte, Margarida, 2018. "The role of motivations and involvement in wine tourists' intention to return: SEM and fsQCA findings," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 313-321.
    3. Poorkavoos, Meysam & Duan, Yanqing & Edwards, John S. & Ramanathan, Ramakrishnan, 2016. "Identifying the configurational paths to innovation in SMEs: A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 5843-5854.
    4. Dan Bouhnik & Tali Marcus, 2006. "Interaction in distance‐learning courses," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 57(3), pages 299-305, February.
    5. William H. DeLone & Ephraim R. McLean, 1992. "Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 3(1), pages 60-95, March.
    6. Long Pham & Kioh Kim & Bruce Walker & Thomas DeNardin & Hanh Le, 2019. "Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure Student Perceived E-Learning Service Quality," International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems (IJEIS), IGI Global, vol. 15(2), pages 15-42, April.
    7. Reinhard Bernsteiner & Herwig Ostermann & Roland Staudinger, 2008. "Facilitating E-Learning with Social Software: Attitudes and Usage from the Student's Point of View," International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies (IJWLTT), IGI Global, vol. 3(3), pages 16-33, July.
    8. Bing Wu, 2016. "Identifying the Influential Factors of Knowledge Sharing in E-Learning 2.0 Systems," International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems (IJEIS), IGI Global, vol. 12(1), pages 85-102, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wei Gu & Ying Xu & Zeng-Jun Sun, 2021. "Does MOOC Quality Affect Users’ Continuance Intention? Based on an Integrated Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Xiaoxu Dong & Huawei Zhao & Tiancai Li, 2022. "The Role of Live-Streaming E-Commerce on Consumers’ Purchasing Intention regarding Green Agricultural Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-13, April.
    3. Philippe Cohard, 2020. "Information Systems Values: A Study of the Intranet in Three French Higher Education Institutions," Post-Print hal-02987225, HAL.
    4. Yan Zhang & Ciaran B. Trace, 2022. "The quality of health and wellness self‐tracking data: A consumer perspective," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(6), pages 879-891, June.
    5. Hasan, Rajibul & Lowe, Ben & Petrovici, Dan, 2020. "Consumer adoption of pro-poor service innovations in subsistence marketplaces," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 461-475.
    6. Tsung Teng Chen, 2012. "The development and empirical study of a literature review aiding system," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 92(1), pages 105-116, July.
    7. Abdesamad Zouine & Pierre Fenies, 2014. "The Critical Success Factors Of The ERP System Project: A Meta-Analysis Methodology," Post-Print hal-01419785, HAL.
    8. Proserpio, Luigi & Magni, Massimo, 2012. "Teaching without the teacher? Building a learning environment through computer simulations," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 99-105.
    9. Łukasz Tomczyk & Katarzyna Potyrała & Anna Włoch & Joanna Wnęk-Gozdek & Nataliia Demeshkant, 2020. "Evaluation of the Functionality of a New E-Learning Platform vs. Previous Experiences in E-Learning and the Self-Assessment of Own Digital Literacy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-22, December.
    10. Chen-Yuan Chen & Bih-Yaw Shih & Shih-Hsien Yu, 2012. "Disaster prevention and reduction for exploring teachers’ technology acceptance using a virtual reality system and partial least squares techniques," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 62(3), pages 1217-1231, July.
    11. Jin P. Gerlach & Ronald T. Cenfetelli, 2022. "Overcoming the Single-IS Paradigm in Individual-Level IS Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 476-488, June.
    12. Yoonsun Oh & Jungsuk Oh, 2017. "A critical incident approach to consumer response in the smartphone market: product, service and contents," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 577-597, August.
    13. Blackburn, Nivea & Brown, Judy & Dillard, Jesse & Hooper, Val, 2014. "A dialogical framing of AIS–SEA design," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 83-101.
    14. Landrum, Hollis & Prybutok, Victor R., 2004. "A service quality and success model for the information service industry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(3), pages 628-642, August.
    15. Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Anastasia Papazafeiropoulou & Willem-Paul Brinkman & Banita Lal, 2010. "Examining the influence of service quality and secondary influence on the behavioural intention to change internet service provider," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 207-217, April.
    16. Aladwani, Adel M. & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2018. "Towards a theory of SocioCitizenry: Quality anticipation, trust configuration, and approved adaptation of governmental social media," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 261-272.
    17. Ko, Eun-Jung & Kim, A-Hyun & Kim, Sang-Soo, 2021. "Toward the understanding of the appropriation of ICT-based Smart-work and its impact on performance in organizations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    18. Safdar, Sarah & Ren, Minglun & Chudhery, Muhammad Adnan Zahid & Huo, Jiazhen & Rehman, Hakeem-Ur & Rafique, Raza, 2022. "Using cloud-based virtual learning environments to mitigate increasing disparity in urban-rural academic competence," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    19. Saliha Anwar & Tayyaba Rafique, 2022. "Development Of Service Quality Scale In Online Higher Education," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 11(1), pages 53-62, March.
    20. O'Keefe, Robert M., 2016. "Experimental behavioural research in operational research: What we know and what we might come to know," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(3), pages 899-907.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5557-:d:1103831. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.