IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i6p5357-d1100278.html

An Investigation of Saudi Arabia’s Ambitious Reform Programme with Vision 2030 to Incentivise Investment in the Country’s Non-Oil Industries

Author

Listed:
  • Firoz Alam

    (Department of Finance, College of Administration and Financial Science, Saudi Electronic University, Riyadh 11673, Saudi Arabia)

  • Shahid Alam

    (Department of Management, College of Administration and Financial Science, Saudi Electronic University, Riyadh 11673, Saudi Arabia)

  • Mohammad Asif

    (Department of Finance, College of Administration and Financial Science, Saudi Electronic University, Riyadh 11673, Saudi Arabia)

  • Umme Hani

    (Department of Finance, College of Administration and Financial Science, Saudi Electronic University, Riyadh 11673, Saudi Arabia)

  • Mohd Naved Khan

    (Department of Finance, College of Administration and Financial Science, Saudi Electronic University, Riyadh 11673, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Vision 2030 of Saudi Arabia is an important project that mainly targets the reduction in dependency on the oil economy through the growth of non-oil Industries. This study investigates Saudi Arabia’s effort for Vision 2030 to incentivise investment in the non-oil industry’s growth. Material and Methods:A sample of 225 employees of the non-oil industries of Saudi Arabia was selected as sample participants. A survey was conducted for data collection, and SPSS software was used to analyse the data. Findings:The findings indicate that sig values for all tests were 0.000 < 0.05 to support the selection of an alternative hypothesis. Therefore, it can easily be determined from the analysis that a more robust relationship is present between Vision 2030 with incentivised investment, economic stability, and financial accommodation.The advantages of reform programs have been effective in non-oil industries of Saudi Arabia to increase production standards and obtain more customer engagement.Conclusion: This research contributes to providing a straightforward concept in Vision 2030, which is Saudi Arabia’s reform program to develop the economic condition of Non-Oil Sectors. Hence, reform in the policy for economic stability can help to maintain the growth of different sectors and can further support financial assets.

Suggested Citation

  • Firoz Alam & Shahid Alam & Mohammad Asif & Umme Hani & Mohd Naved Khan, 2023. "An Investigation of Saudi Arabia’s Ambitious Reform Programme with Vision 2030 to Incentivise Investment in the Country’s Non-Oil Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-19, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5357-:d:1100278
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5357/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5357/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giorgia Maffini & Jing Xing & Michael P. Devereux, 2019. "The Impact of Investment Incentives: Evidence from UK Corporation Tax Returns," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 11(3), pages 361-389, August.
    2. Imed Medhioub & Mohammed Makni, 2020. "Oil price and stock market returns uncertainties and private investment in Saudi Arabia," Economic Journal of Emerging Markets, Universitas Islam Indonesia, vol. 12(2), pages 208-219.
    3. Leonidou, Erasmia & Christofi, Michael & Vrontis, Demetris & Thrassou, Alkis, 2020. "An integrative framework of stakeholder engagement for innovation management and entrepreneurship development," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 245-258.
    4. Sanwar A. Sunny & Cheng Shu, 2019. "Investments, incentives, and innovation: geographical clustering dynamics as drivers of sustainable entrepreneurship," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 905-927, April.
    5. Wafa Alwakid & Sebastian Aparicio & David Urbano, 2021. "The Influence of Green Entrepreneurship on Sustainable Development in Saudi Arabia: The Role of Formal Institutions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-23, May.
    6. König, Marc & Ungerer, Christina & Baltes, Guido & Terzidis, Orestis, 2019. "Different patterns in the evolution of digital and non-digital ventures' business models," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 844-852.
    7. Katherine Lieberknecht, 2022. "Community-Centered Climate Planning," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 88(1), pages 97-112, January.
    8. Igor Chugunov & Valentina Makohon, 2019. "Fiscal Strategy As An Instrument Of Economic Growth," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 5(3).
    9. Seth Schindler & J. Miguel Kanai, 2021. "Getting the territory right: infrastructure-led development and the re-emergence of spatial planning strategies," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(1), pages 40-51, January.
    10. Eglantina Hysa & Alba Kruja & Naqeeb Ur Rehman & Rafael Laurenti, 2020. "Circular Economy Innovation and Environmental Sustainability Impact on Economic Growth: An Integrated Model for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-16, June.
    11. Faudot, Adrien, 2019. "Saudi Arabia and the rentier regime trap: A critical assessment of the plan Vision 2030," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 94-101.
    12. Nadia Yusuf & Dareen Abdulmohsen, 2022. "Saudi Arabia’s NEOM Project as a Testing Ground for Economically Feasible Planned Cities: Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Haian Yu & Zufeng Shang & Fenglai Wang, 2024. "Analysis of the Current Situation of the Construction Industry in Saudi Arabia and the Factors Affecting It: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-23, August.
    2. Rahmanwali Sahar & Javidullah Iqbal & Md. Abu Jahid & Md Abdullahel Kafi & Walid Qarar, 2026. "Adoption of digital technologies in operation to improve sustainability: a bibliometric and content analysis for future studies," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-28, December.
    3. Martijn J. Burger & Efstratia Arampatzi, 2025. "Vision 2030 and Subjective Well-Being in Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-20, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tomasz Kusio & Mariantonietta Fiore, 2022. "Which Stakeholders’ Sector Matters in Rural Development? That Is the Problem," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-16, January.
    2. Gundert Hannah & Nicolay Katharina & Steinbrenner Daniela & Wickel Sophia, 2024. "The Tax Attractiveness of EU Locations for Corporate Investments: A Stocktaking of Past Developments and Recent Reforms," The Economists' Voice, De Gruyter, vol. 21(1), pages 97-132.
    3. Wei Wang & Kehui Wei & Oleksandr Kubatko & Vladyslav Piven & Yulija Chortok & Oleksandr Derykolenko, 2023. "Economic Growth and Sustainable Transition: Investigating Classical and Novel Factors in Developed Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-15, August.
    4. Mr. Shafik Hebous & Andualem Mengistu, 2024. "Efficient Economic Rent Taxation under a Global Minimum Corporate Tax," IMF Working Papers 2024/057, International Monetary Fund.
    5. Ilias Alami & Adam D Dixon, 2023. "Uneven and combined state capitalism," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 55(1), pages 72-99, February.
    6. Marco Valerio Rossi & Pasquale Sasso & Andrea Perna & Ludovico Solima, 2025. "Engaging marginal stakeholders on social networking sites. A cross‐country exploratory analysis among Generation Z consumers," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(1), pages 155-173, January.
    7. Holtmann, Svea & Braun, Anna-Sophie & Cho, Jae & Koch, Reinald & Langenmayr, Dominika, 2025. "Investment effects of a quasi-robot tax: Evidence from South Korea," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 308, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre.
    8. Maria Elena Latino & Marta Menegoli & Fulvio Signore & Maria Chiara De Lorenzi, 2023. "The Potential of Gamification for Social Sustainability: Meaning and Purposes in Agri-Food Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-18, June.
    9. Jawaria Zahid & Atif Khan Jadoon & Bisma Hamza & Muhammad Ali, 2024. "Macroeconomics Determinants of Fiscal Sustainability in the Asian Countries," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 13(1), pages 193-201.
    10. Mahavarpour, Nasrin & Marvi, Reza & Foroudi, Pantea, 2023. "A Brief History of Service Innovation: The evolution of past, present, and future of service innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    11. Charles Delmotte, 2021. "Simple rules and the Political Economy of Income Taxation: the strengths of a uniform expense rule," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 323-339, December.
    12. Mateusz Jankiewicz, 2025. "The analysis of interconnections between the three dimensions of Sustainable Development in terms of the economy structure transformations," Discussion Papers 2025/323, Dipartimento di Economia e Management (DEM), University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
    13. Masanori ORIHARA & Takafumi SUZUKI, 2021. "Windfalls? Costs and Benefits of Investment Tax Incentives due to Financial Constraints," Discussion papers 21087, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    14. Ángela Triguero & María C. Cuerva & Francisco J. Sáez‐Martínez, 2022. "Closing the loop through eco‐innovation by European firms: Circular economy for sustainable development," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2337-2350, July.
    15. Ligia Alba Melo-Becerra & Javier Ávila Mahecha & Jorge Enrique Ramos-Forero, 2017. "The Effect of Corporate Taxes on Investment: Evidence from the Colombian Firms," IHEID Working Papers 10-2017, Economics Section, The Graduate Institute of International Studies.
    16. Nerajda Feruni & Eglantina Hysa & Mirela Panait & Irina Gabriela Rădulescu & Alina Brezoi, 2020. "The Impact of Corruption, Economic Freedom and Urbanization on Economic Development: Western Balkans versus EU-27," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-22, November.
    17. Kaoru Hosono & Masaki Hotei & Daisuke Miyakawa, 2023. "Causal effects of a tax incentive on SME capital investment," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 61(2), pages 539-557, August.
    18. Andrew Stokols & Justin Kollar, 2025. "Extended state infrastructure power in an age of networked competition: The cases of Thailand and Taiwan," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 57(1), pages 3-21, February.
    19. Steve Rolf & Seth Schindler, 2023. "The US–China rivalry and the emergence of state platform capitalism," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 55(5), pages 1255-1280, August.
    20. Assunta Di Vaio & Rohail Hassan & Gabriella D’Amore & Riccardo Tiscini, 2024. "Responsible innovation and ethical corporate behavior in the Asian fashion industry: A systematic literature review and avenues ahead," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 1129-1173, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5357-:d:1100278. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.