IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i6p5262-d1098838.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Double C Block Project: Thermal Performance of an Innovative Concrete Masonry Unit with Embedded Insulation

Author

Listed:
  • Luca Caruso

    (Department of Environmental Design, Faculty for the Built Environment, University of Malta, MSD 2080 Msida, Malta)

  • Vincent M. Buhagiar

    (Department of Environmental Design, Faculty for the Built Environment, University of Malta, MSD 2080 Msida, Malta)

  • Simon P. Borg

    (Department of Environmental Design, Faculty for the Built Environment, University of Malta, MSD 2080 Msida, Malta)

Abstract

The Double C Block (DCB) is an innovative composite Concrete Masonry Unit (CMU) developed to offer enhanced thermal performance over standard hollow core blocks (HCBs). The DCB features an original design consisting of a polyurethane (PUR) foam inserted between two concrete c-shaped layers, thus acting as the insulating layer and the binding agent of the two concrete elements simultaneously. The purpose of this research is to describe the results obtained when assessing the thermal transmittance (U DCB and U HCB ) of these blocks using three different methodologies: theoretical steady-state U-value calculations, numerical simulation using a Finite Element Method (FEM), and in situ monitoring of the U-value by means of the Heat Flow method (HFM). The results obtained show that the three methodologies corroborated each other within their inherent limitations. The DCB showed a performance gap of 52.1% between the predicted FEM simulation (U DCB was 0.71 W/(m 2 K)) and the values measured via HFM, which converged at 1.47 W/(m 2 K). Similarly, a gap of 19.9% was observed when assessing the HCB. The theoretical value via FEM of U HCB was 1.93 W/(m 2 K) and the measured one converged at 2.41 W/(m 2 K). Notwithstanding this, the DCB showed superior thermal performance over the traditional block thanks to a lower U-value, and it complies with the Maltese building energy code. Further improvements are envisaged.

Suggested Citation

  • Luca Caruso & Vincent M. Buhagiar & Simon P. Borg, 2023. "The Double C Block Project: Thermal Performance of an Innovative Concrete Masonry Unit with Embedded Insulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-19, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5262-:d:1098838
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5262/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5262/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luca Evangelisti & Claudia Guattari & Paola Gori & Roberto De Lieto Vollaro, 2015. "In Situ Thermal Transmittance Measurements for Investigating Differences between Wall Models and Actual Building Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-11, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Doo Sung Choi & Myeong Jin Ko, 2017. "Comparison of Various Analysis Methods Based on Heat Flowmeters and Infrared Thermography Measurements for the Evaluation of the In Situ Thermal Transmittance of Opaque Exterior Walls," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-22, July.
    2. Doo-Sung Choi & Ye-Ji Lee & Ji-Hoon Moon & Yong-Shik Kim & Myeong-Jin Ko, 2023. "Estimating In-Situ R-Value of Highly Insulated Building Walls Based on the Measurement of Temperature and Heat Flux Inside the Wall," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-16, July.
    3. Marianna Rotilio & Federica Cucchiella & Pierluigi De Berardinis & Vincenzo Stornelli, 2018. "Thermal Transmittance Measurements of the Historical Masonries: Some Case Studies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, November.
    4. Carlo Andrea Bollino & Francesco Asdrubali & Paolo Polinori & Simona Bigerna & Silvia Micheli & Claudia Guattari & Antonella Rotili, 2017. "A Note on Medium- and Long-Term Global Energy Prospects and Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-25, May.
    5. Kyriakidis, Andreas & Michael, Aimilios & Illampas, Rogiros & Charmpis, Dimos C. & Ioannou, Ioannis, 2018. "Thermal performance and embodied energy of standard and retrofitted wall systems encountered in Southern Europe," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 1016-1027.
    6. Paola Marrone & Paola Gori & Francesco Asdrubali & Luca Evangelisti & Laura Calcagnini & Gianluca Grazieschi, 2018. "Energy Benchmarking in Educational Buildings through Cluster Analysis of Energy Retrofitting," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-20, March.
    7. Bienvenido-Huertas, David & Moyano, Juan & Marín, David & Fresco-Contreras, Rafael, 2019. "Review of in situ methods for assessing the thermal transmittance of walls," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 356-371.
    8. David Bienvenido-Huertas & Roberto Rodríguez-Álvaro & Juan José Moyano & Fernando Rico & David Marín, 2018. "Determining the U -Value of Façades Using the Thermometric Method: Potentials and Limitations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, February.
    9. Fabio Nardecchia & Benedetta Mattoni & Francesca Pagliaro & Lucia Cellucci & Fabio Bisegna & Franco Gugliermetti, 2016. "Computational Fluid Dynamic Modelling of Thermal Periodic Stabilized Regime in Passive Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-18, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5262-:d:1098838. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.