IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i6p4956-d1093668.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Areas of Individual Consumption Reduction: A Focus on Implemented Restrictions and Willingness for Further Cut-Backs

Author

Listed:
  • Lisbeth Weitensfelder

    (Department of Environmental Health, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria)

  • Karen Heesch

    (Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Kassel, 34127 Kassel, Germany)

  • Elisabeth Arnold

    (Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, 1010 Vienna, Austria)

  • Martin Schwarz

    (Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, 1010 Vienna, Austria)

  • Kathrin Lemmerer

    (Department of Environmental Health, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria)

  • Hans-Peter Hutter

    (Department of Environmental Health, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria)

Abstract

To reduce the high amount of Greenhouse Gas emissions, a more sustainable individual lifestyle is crucial. However, existing research regarding pro-environmental behaviors rarely focuses on a reduction in consumption. Hence, this study investigated different variables (e.g., habits, estimated efficacy of measures, estimated danger of climate change) that might enhance people’s willingness to cut back on several private consumptions for the sake of the environment. In a German-speaking online survey ( n = 435), different areas of consumption were looked at separately in different regression models. Additionally, we investigated whether a randomized highlighting of climate change consequences could further increase willingness to implement private cut-backs, which could not be confirmed in subsequent variance analyses. Overall, some variables seem to be connected with a higher willingness to implement cut-backs in most consumption areas and on several levels (e.g., estimated efficacy); other predictors are only involved in specific cut-backs and specific levels (e.g., materialism). Furthermore, different variables seem to be of importance when it comes to already implemented consumption restrictions as opposed to willingness to implement further cut-backs. These results lead to the conclusion that, in order to maximize mitigation potential, it is important to tailor suggestions to the area of consumption. Additionally, for most areas, awareness of the mitigation efficacy of the respective behavior seems crucial.

Suggested Citation

  • Lisbeth Weitensfelder & Karen Heesch & Elisabeth Arnold & Martin Schwarz & Kathrin Lemmerer & Hans-Peter Hutter, 2023. "Areas of Individual Consumption Reduction: A Focus on Implemented Restrictions and Willingness for Further Cut-Backs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-21, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:4956-:d:1093668
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/4956/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/4956/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gintare Stankuniene & Dalia Streimikiene & Grigorios L. Kyriakopoulos, 2020. "Systematic Literature Review on Behavioral Barriers of Climate Change Mitigation in Households," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    3. A. Greening, Lorna & Greene, David L. & Difiglio, Carmen, 2000. "Energy efficiency and consumption -- the rebound effect -- a survey," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(6-7), pages 389-401, June.
    4. Niall McLoughlin, 2021. "Communicating efficacy: How the IPCC, scientists, and other communicators can facilitate adaptive responses to climate change without compromising on policy neutrality," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 169(1), pages 1-14, November.
    5. Ahyoung Yoon & Daeyoung Jeong & Jinhyung Chon & Ji-Hwan Yoon, 2019. "A Study of Consumers’ Intentions to Participate in Responsible Tourism Using Message Framing and Appeals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-14, February.
    6. Ann Bostrom & Adam L. Hayes & Katherine M. Crosman, 2019. "Efficacy, Action, and Support for Reducing Climate Change Risks," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(4), pages 805-828, April.
    7. Rusitha Wijekoon & Mohamad Fazli Sabri, 2021. "Determinants That Influence Green Product Purchase Intention and Behavior: A Literature Review and Guiding Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-40, May.
    8. Adrian Brügger & Suraje Dessai & Patrick Devine-Wright & Thomas A. Morton & Nicholas F. Pidgeon, 2015. "Psychological responses to the proximity of climate change," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 5(12), pages 1031-1037, December.
    9. Darcy A. Santor & Ihssane Fethi & Sara-Emilie McIntee, 2020. "Restricting Our Consumption of Material Goods: An Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-13, January.
    10. Seth Wynes & Jiaying Zhao & Simon D. Donner, 2020. "How well do people understand the climate impact of individual actions?," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 162(3), pages 1521-1534, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Niall McLoughlin, 2021. "Communicating efficacy: How the IPCC, scientists, and other communicators can facilitate adaptive responses to climate change without compromising on policy neutrality," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 169(1), pages 1-14, November.
    2. Eka Sudarmaji & Sri Ambarwati & Mira Munira, 2022. "Measurement of the Rebound Effect on Urban Household Energy Consumption Savings," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 12(5), pages 88-100, September.
    3. Spandagos, Constantine & Yarime, Masaru & Baark, Erik & Ng, Tze Ling, 2020. "“Triple Target” policy framework to influence household energy behavior: Satisfy, strengthen, include," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    4. Serena L. Colombo & Salvatore G. Chiarella & Camille Lefrançois & Jacques Fradin & Antonino Raffone & Luca Simione, 2023. "Why Knowing about Climate Change Is Not Enough to Change: A Perspective Paper on the Factors Explaining the Environmental Knowledge-Action Gap," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-17, October.
    5. Zbigniew Bohdanowicz & Beata Łopaciuk-Gonczaryk & Jarosław Kowalski & Cezary Biele, 2021. "Households’ Electrical Energy Conservation and Management: An Ecological Break-Through, or the Same Old Consumption-Growth Path?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-21, October.
    6. Craig, Christopher A. & Feng, Song, 2017. "Exploring utility organization electricity generation, residential electricity consumption, and energy efficiency: A climatic approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P1), pages 779-790.
    7. Cayla, Jean-Michel & Maizi, Nadia & Marchand, Christophe, 2011. "The role of income in energy consumption behaviour: Evidence from French households data," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(12), pages 7874-7883.
    8. Klaus, Geraldine & Ernst, Andreas & Oswald, Lisa, 2020. "Psychological factors influencing laypersons’ acceptance of climate engineering, climate change mitigation and business as usual scenarios," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    9. Sara de Sio & Alessandra Zamagni & Giulia Casu & Paola Gremigni, 2022. "Green Trust as a Mediator in the Relationship between Green Advertising Skepticism, Environmental Knowledge, and Intention to Buy Green Food," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-15, December.
    10. Heesen, Florian & Madlener, Reinhard, 2016. "Technology Acceptance as Part of the Energy Performance Gap in Energy-Efficient Retrofitted Dwellings," FCN Working Papers 25/2014, E.ON Energy Research Center, Future Energy Consumer Needs and Behavior (FCN).
    11. Santarius, Tilman & Soland, Martin, 2018. "How Technological Efficiency Improvements Change Consumer Preferences: Towards a Psychological Theory of Rebound Effects," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 414-424.
    12. Gary J. Pickering & Kaylee Schoen & Marta Botta, 2021. "Lifestyle decisions and climate mitigation: current action and behavioural intent of youth," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 26(6), pages 1-27, August.
    13. Akbari, Morteza & Foroudi, Pantea & Khodayari, Maryam & Zaman Fashami, Rahime & Shahabaldini parizi, Zahra & Shahriari, Elmira, 2022. "Sharing Your Assets: A Holistic Review of Sharing Economy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 604-625.
    14. Owen, A. & Mitchell, G. & Gouldson, A., 2014. "Unseen influence—The role of low carbon retrofit advisers and installers in the adoption and use of domestic energy technology," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 169-179.
    15. Roman Švec & Stanislav Martinát & Kamil Pícha & Petr Klusáček & Jaroslav Knotek & Justin Calvin Schaefer & Monika Březinová & Josef Navrátil, 2021. "What drives visitors to tourist sites to choose “green” accommodation facilities?," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(10), pages 15074-15099, October.
    16. Iddrisu Amadu & Charles Atanga Adongo, 2022. "Climate Action (Goal 13): The role of climate beliefs, health security and tourism prioritisation in 30 Sub-Saharan African countries," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 171(3), pages 1-25, April.
    17. Yezheng Li & Pinyi Yao & Syuhaily Osman & Norzalina Zainudin & Mohamad Fazli Sabri, 2022. "A Thematic Review on Using Food Delivery Services during the Pandemic: Insights for the Post-COVID-19 Era," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-22, November.
    18. Pinyi Yao & Syuhaily Osman & Mohamad Fazli Sabri & Norzalina Zainudin, 2022. "Consumer Behavior in Online-to-Offline (O2O) Commerce: A Thematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-24, June.
    19. Jakučionytė-Skodienė, Miglė & Krikštolaitis, Ričardas & Liobikienė, Genovaitė, 2022. "The contribution of changes in climate-friendly behaviour, climate change concern and personal responsibility to household greenhouse gas emissions: Heating/cooling and transport activities in the Eur," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    20. Peters, Anja & Sonnberger, Marco & Deuschle, Jürgen, 2012. "Rebound-Effekte aus sozialwissenschaftlicher Perspektive: Ergebnisse aus Fokusgruppen im Rahmen des REBOUND-Projektes," Working Papers "Sustainability and Innovation" S5/2012, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:4956-:d:1093668. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.