IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i6p4799-d1091182.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis on Stochastic Change Characteristics of Technological Innovation Efficiency under Endogenous Change in Technological Information and Investment of Knowledge Capital

Author

Listed:
  • Linsheng Yang

    (Institute of New Economics Research, Ningbo Polytechnic, Ningbo 315800, China)

  • Jintao Gong

    (Institute of New Economics Research, Ningbo Polytechnic, Ningbo 315800, China)

  • Bihao Wang

    (School of Economics and Management, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang 330013, China)

Abstract

The allocation of innovation-related elements is influenced by intangible elements such as technological information, which affects knowledge capital, human capital, and material element investment, resulting in the stochastic change of technological innovation efficiency. The endogenous change in technological information in element investment reduces friction, lowers costs, improves efficiency, and gradually reduces the deviation between knowledge capital investment and technological innovation efficiency. In terms of small knowledge capital investment characterized by the low demand for technological information and a single source, it is easier to make more-accurate predictions, so the stochastic change in technological innovation efficiency tends to be gentle. The endogenous change in technological information continuously increases the proportion of replacing other elements with knowledge capital investment, and the efficiency of technological innovation improves steadily. Under the condition of unchanged investment in other elements, there is a great difference in the duration of technological information between the simultaneous selection and the successive selection of knowledge capital investment. When one-time instantaneous information and continuous complete information are respectively acquired, the stochastic variation of technological innovation efficiency is obvious. On the basis of the technological innovation data of 287 listed companies in eight industries, this paper compares and analyzes the measurement results of GMM and OLS to verify the above findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Linsheng Yang & Jintao Gong & Bihao Wang, 2023. "Analysis on Stochastic Change Characteristics of Technological Innovation Efficiency under Endogenous Change in Technological Information and Investment of Knowledge Capital," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-27, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:4799-:d:1091182
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/4799/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/4799/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Avinash Dixit, 2009. "Governance Institutions and Economic Activity," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 99(1), pages 5-24, March.
    2. Katz, Michael L & Shapiro, Carl, 1985. "Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 75(3), pages 424-440, June.
    3. Qiuqi Wang & Yue Kuen Kwok, 2019. "Signaling game models of equity financing under information asymmetry and finite project life," International Journal of Financial Engineering (IJFE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 6(01), pages 1-38, March.
    4. Patrick W. Schmitz, 2006. "Information Gathering, Transaction Costs, and the Property Rights Approach," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 96(1), pages 422-434, March.
    5. Marco Battaglini & Rebecca B. Morton & Thomas R. Palfrey, 2008. "Information Aggregation and Strategic Abstention in Large Laboratory Elections," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 98(2), pages 194-200, May.
    6. Mark Satterthwaite & Artyom Shneyerov, 2007. "Dynamic Matching, Two-Sided Incomplete Information, and Participation Costs: Existence and Convergence to Perfect Competition," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 75(1), pages 155-200, January.
    7. Farrell, Joseph & Klemperer, Paul, 2007. "Coordination and Lock-In: Competition with Switching Costs and Network Effects," Handbook of Industrial Organization, in: Mark Armstrong & Robert Porter (ed.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 31, pages 1967-2072, Elsevier.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Defang Ma & Liangwei Li & Yuxi Song & Mengkai Wang & Qiaowen Han, 2023. "Corporate Sustainability: The Impact of Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance on Corporate Development and Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-16, September.
    2. Bo Zeng & Weimin Zhang & Defang Ma & Chenyang Zhang & Xiao Liu, 2023. "The Impact of Group Control on the Effectiveness of Enterprise Innovation: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-15, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Heggedal, Tom-Reiel & Helland, Leif & Neset Joslin, Knut-Eric, 2018. "Should I Stay or should I Go? Bandwagons in the lab," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 86-97.
    2. Jonathan Levin, 2011. "The Economics of Internet Markets," Discussion Papers 10-018, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.
    3. Luís Cabral, 2011. "Dynamic Price Competition with Network Effects," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 78(1), pages 83-111.
    4. Reuter, Marco, 2022. "The value of decentralization using the blockchain," ZEW Discussion Papers 22-056, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    5. Gastón Llanes & Andrea Mantovani & Francisco Ruiz-Aliseda, 2019. "Entry into Complementary Good Markets with Network Effects," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 4(4), pages 262-282, December.
    6. Vitor Trindade & Johannes Moenius, 2007. "Networks, Standards and Intellectual Property Rights," Working Papers 0705, Department of Economics, University of Missouri.
    7. Buehler, Stefan & Halbheer, Daniel, 2012. "Persuading consumers with social attitudes," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 84(1), pages 439-450.
    8. P.J. Lamberson & Scott E. Page, 2018. "First mover or higher quality? Optimal product strategy in markets with positive feedbacks," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(1), pages 40-52, March.
    9. Maruyama Masayoshi & Zennyo Yusuke, 2013. "Compatibility and the Product Life Cycle in Two-Sided Markets," Review of Network Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 12(2), pages 131-155, June.
    10. Tsuyoshi Toshimitsu, 2018. "Strategic Compatibility Choice, Network Alliance, and Welfare," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 245-252, June.
    11. Heiden, Bowman, 2016. "The viability of FRAND: How the seminal landmark Microsoft ruling could impact the value of standard essential patents and the future of telecom standards," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(9), pages 870-887.
    12. Foros, Øystein & Kind, Hans Jarle & Sand, Jan Yngve, 2009. "Entry may increase network providers' profit," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(9), pages 486-494, October.
    13. Alexei Parakhonyak & Nick Vikander, 2019. "Optimal Sales Schemes for Network Goods," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(2), pages 819-841, February.
    14. Czajkowski, Mikołaj & Sobolewski, Maciej, 2016. "How much do switching costs and local network effects contribute to consumer lock-in in mobile telephony?," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(9), pages 855-869.
    15. P. Dogan, "undated". "Vertical Networks, Integration, and Connectivity," Working Paper 33644, Harvard University OpenScholar.
    16. Zijun (June) Shi & Kaifu Zhang & Kannan Srinivasan, 2019. "Freemium as an Optimal Strategy for Market Dominant Firms," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(1), pages 150-169, January.
    17. Ningyuan Chen & Ying-Ju Chen, 2021. "Duopoly Competition with Network Effects in Discrete Choice Models," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 69(2), pages 545-559, March.
    18. Jay Pil Choi & Christodoulos Stefanadis, 2022. "Network Externalities, Dominant Value Margins, And Equilibrium Uniqueness," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 63(4), pages 1805-1827, November.
    19. Gerard Llobet & Michael Manove, 2006. "Network Size and Network Capture," Working Papers wp2006_0604, CEMFI.
    20. Jiawei Chen & Ulrich Doraszelski & Joseph E. Harrington, Jr., 2009. "Avoiding market dominance: product compatibility in markets with network effects," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 40(3), pages 455-485, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:4799-:d:1091182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.