IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i5p4546-d1086845.html

Land Use Conflicts and Synergies on Agricultural Land in Brandenburg, Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Unger

    (Geography Department, Applied Geoinformation Science Lab, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10099 Berlin, Germany
    Ministry of Agriculture, Environment and Climate Protection of Brandenburg, 14467 Potsdam, Germany)

  • Tobia Lakes

    (Geography Department, Applied Geoinformation Science Lab, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10099 Berlin, Germany
    Integrative Research Institute on Transformations of Human-Environment Systems (IRI THESys), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10099 Berlin, Germany)

Abstract

The growing and multiple interests in land as a resource has led to an increase in locally or regionally clashing land use interests on agricultural land which may result in conflicts or open up possibilities for synergies. Urbanization, food production, renewable energy production, environmental protection, and climate protection are known as key land use interests in many regions. The objective of our study is to identify and map land use conflicts, land use synergies, and areas with land use synergy potentials in the federal state of Brandenburg, Germany. We have combined different methods: an analysis of statistical data, an online survey with farmers, a primary document analysis (articles, court documents, policy documents, position papers), and a GIS-based spatial analysis. In our Brandenburg case study, we have identified the use of agricultural land for renewable energy production and environmental protection as the most relevant land use interests leading to conflict situations. We show that land use synergies can make a significant contribution to achieving environmental and climate protection goals, as well as sustainable development. Through the site-adapted and targeted establishment of agroforestry systems, agricultural areas with agri-photovoltaic systems and agricultural parcels with integrated nonproductive areas may lead to land use synergies. Our study contributes to a better understanding of the occurrence of land use conflicts and land use synergies. We highlight the potential for targeted and sustainable environmental and climate protection through the promotion of land use synergies as a result of establishing agroforestry systems and agricultural parcels with agri-photovoltaic systems and integrated nonproductive areas. Our results provide a basis for agricultural policy to promote land use systems that contribute to environmental and climate protection.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Unger & Tobia Lakes, 2023. "Land Use Conflicts and Synergies on Agricultural Land in Brandenburg, Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-19, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4546-:d:1086845
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4546/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4546/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mosquera-Losada, M.R. & Santiago-Freijanes, J.J. & Rois-Díaz, M. & Moreno, G. & den Herder, M. & Aldrey-Vázquez, J.A. & Ferreiro-Domínguez, N. & Pantera, A. & Pisanelli, A. & Rigueiro-Rodríguez, A., 2018. "Agroforestry in Europe: A land management policy tool to combat climate change," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 603-613.
    2. Yang Zhang & Yanfang Liu & Yan Zhang & Xuesong Kong & Ying Jing & Enxiang Cai & Lingyu Zhang & Yi Liu & Zhengyu Wang & Yaolin Liu, 2019. "Spatial Patterns and Driving Forces of Conflicts among the Three Land Management Red Lines in China: A Case Study of the Wuhan Urban Development Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Krystyna Stave, 2010. "Participatory System Dynamics Modeling for Sustainable Environmental Management: Observations from Four Cases," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 2(9), pages 1-23, September.
    4. Arnold, Stephan & Lucas, Christian & Pauly, Ralf, 2020. "Der neue Nutzungsartenkatalog zur Erweiterten Tatsächlichen Nutzung in der amtlichen Flächenstatistik," WISTA – Wirtschaft und Statistik, Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), Wiesbaden, vol. 72(1), pages 44-56.
    5. Charabi, Yassine & Gastli, Adel, 2011. "PV site suitability analysis using GIS-based spatial fuzzy multi-criteria evaluation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(9), pages 2554-2561.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nerea Morán-Alonso & Andrés Viedma-Guiard & Marian Simón-Rojo & Rafael Córdoba-Hernández, 2025. "Agricultural Land Suitability Analysis for Land Use Planning: The Case of the Madrid Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Mohammad Alqadi & Szimona Zaharieva & Antonia Commichau & Markus Disse & Thomas Koellner & Gabriele Chiogna, 2025. "Developing and Implementing a Decision Support System-Integrated Framework for Evaluating Solar Park Effects on Water-Related Ecosystem Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-28, April.
    3. Hauger, Salome & Lieb, Vanessa & Glaser, Rüdiger, 2025. "Spatial potential analysis and site selection for agrivoltaics in Germany," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    4. Hauger, Salome & Gudat, Charlotte & Lieb, Vanessa & Glaser, Rüdiger, 2025. "GIS-based potential analysis and agro-economic site selection for agrivoltaics using AHP in two German counties," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    5. Maier, Rachel & Lütz, Luna & Risch, Stanley & Kullmann, Felix & Weinand, Jann & Stolten, Detlef, 2024. "Potential of floating, parking, and agri photovoltaics in Germany," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    6. Czekała, Wojciech & Frankowski, Jakub & Sieracka, Dominika & Pochwatka, Patrycja & Kowalczyk-Juśko, Alina & Witaszek, Kamil & Dudnyk, Alla & Zielińska, Aleksandra & Wisła-Świder, Anna & Dach, Jacek, 2025. "The energy efficiency analysis of sorghum waste biomass grown in a temperate climate," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 320(C).
    7. Melissa Seidel & Sabine Wichmann & Carl Pump & Volker Beckmann, 2024. "Combining Photovoltaics with the Rewetting of Peatlands—A SWOT Analysis of an Innovative Land Use for the Case of North-East Germany," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-31, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liang Liu & Cong Feng & Hongwei Zhang & Xuehua Zhang, 2015. "Game Analysis and Simulation of the River Basin Sustainable Development Strategy Integrating Water Emission Trading," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Meike Weltin & Silke Hüttel, 2023. "Sustainable Intensification Farming as an Enabler for Farm Eco-Efficiency?," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 84(1), pages 315-342, January.
    3. Finn, Thomas & McKenzie, Paul, 2020. "A high-resolution suitability index for solar farm location in complex landscapes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 520-533.
    4. James D. A. Millington & Hang Xiong & Steve Peterson & Jeremy Woods, 2017. "Integrating Modelling Approaches for Understanding Telecoupling: Global Food Trade and Local Land Use," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-18, August.
    5. Zhang, Yuhu & Ren, Jing & Pu, Yanru & Wang, Peng, 2020. "Solar energy potential assessment: A framework to integrate geographic, technological, and economic indices for a potential analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 577-586.
    6. Yanru Zhao & Xiaomin Zhao & Xinyi Huang & Jiaxin Guo & Guohui Chen, 2022. "Identifying a Period of Spatial Land Use Conflicts and Their Driving Forces in the Pearl River Delta," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    7. Charabi, Yassine & Gastli, Adel, 2012. "Spatio-temporal assessment of dust risk maps for solar energy systems using proxy data," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 23-31.
    8. Teresa Front-Dąbrowska & Anita Kwartnik-Pruc, 2024. "Evaluation of the Suitability of Geodetic Databases to Support the Process of Locating Renewable Energy Investments," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-65, October.
    9. Datta, Pritha & Behera, Bhagirath & Rahut, Dil Bahadur, 2024. "India's approach to agroforestry as an effective strategy in the context of climate change: An evaluation of 28 state climate change action plans," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    10. Valerii Havrysh & Antonina Kalinichenko & Edyta Szafranek & Vasyl Hruban, 2022. "Agricultural Land: Crop Production or Photovoltaic Power Plants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-23, April.
    11. Noorollahi, Younes & Ghenaatpisheh Senani, Ali & Fadaei, Ahmad & Simaee, Mobina & Moltames, Rahim, 2022. "A framework for GIS-based site selection and technical potential evaluation of PV solar farm using Fuzzy-Boolean logic and AHP multi-criteria decision-making approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 89-104.
    12. Christoph Schulze & Katarzyna Zagórska & Kati Häfner & Olimpia Markiewicz & Mikołaj Czajkowski & Bettina Matzdorf, 2024. "Using farmers' ex ante preferences to design agri‐environmental contracts: A systematic review," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(1), pages 44-83, February.
    13. Calvert, K. & Pearce, J.M. & Mabee, W.E., 2013. "Toward renewable energy geo-information infrastructures: Applications of GIScience and remote sensing that build institutional capacity," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 416-429.
    14. Sánchez-Lozano, J.M. & García-Cascales, M.S. & Lamata, M.T., 2014. "Identification and selection of potential sites for onshore wind farms development in Region of Murcia, Spain," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 311-324.
    15. Glenn Jolodoro & Tomy Perdana & Susanti Withaningsih, 2025. "A Sustainability Assessment of Electric Vehicles for Enhancing Energy Security and Reducing Emissions in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-23, May.
    16. Al-Badi, A.H. & Malik, A. & Gastli, A., 2011. "Sustainable energy usage in Oman—Opportunities and barriers," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(8), pages 3780-3788.
    17. Amjad, Fahd & Shah, Liaqat Ali, 2020. "Identification and assessment of sites for solar farms development using GIS and density based clustering technique- A case of Pakistan," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 761-769.
    18. Hossein Yousefi & Hamed Hafeznia & Amin Yousefi-Sahzabi, 2018. "Spatial Site Selection for Solar Power Plants Using a GIS-Based Boolean-Fuzzy Logic Model: A Case Study of Markazi Province, Iran," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-18, June.
    19. Alami Merrouni, Ahmed & Elwali Elalaoui, Fakhreddine & Mezrhab, Ahmed & Mezrhab, Abdelhamid & Ghennioui, Abdellatif, 2018. "Large scale PV sites selection by combining GIS and Analytical Hierarchy Process. Case study: Eastern Morocco," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 863-873.
    20. Rubio-Delgado, Judit & Lavado-Contador, J. Francisco & Schnabel, Susanne, 2025. "Recent spatiotemporal dynamics of agroforestry systems in Europe," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4546-:d:1086845. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.