IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i4p3451-d1067438.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of Stress Interaction on Multi-Stress Accelerated Life Test Plan: Assessment Based on Particle Swarm Optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Ekene Gabriel Okafor

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA)

  • Whit Vinson

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA)

  • David Ryan Huitink

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA)

Abstract

Sustainability of products that seek to maintain ecosystem balance, such as electric vehicles or solar system inverters, often require extensive testing during their developmental stages in a manner that minimizes wastage and drives creativity. Multi-stress accelerated test planning is often used for these products, their subsystems and components if their in-service failures are driven by multiple stress factors. Multi-stress accelerated life testing (ALT) often expedites time to failure for highly reliable products. Many studies assume model parameters that may not be appropriate for the considered stress factors. Most importantly, the effect stress interaction has on the ALT plan is often ignored, especially for cases where historical data are lacking. To address this gap, in this work, a technique based on a combination of rapid experimental data collection and heuristic-based optimization is proposed for ALT planning. In addition, the effect of stress interaction on the ALT plan was also evaluated. Specifically, the Arrhenius model was used to develop a maximum likelihood mathematical expression for multi-stress factor scenarios with and without interaction. Subsequently, two optimization stages based on particle swarm optimization (PSO) were carried out using time varying inertia weight constants to drive early and late global and local searches, respectively. In the first stage, model parameters were estimated, while, in the second stage, an ALT optimal plan was generated based on a D-optimality criterion. Verification of stress factor interactions was carried out using graphical response analysis. An experiment, designed to investigate electromigration in solder joints under three stress factors (temperature, current density and mechanical load), was used to validate the study. The variation in the choice of Latin hypercube design (LHD) results in disparity in the levels of stress within each stress combination as well as sample allocation. Our results clearly show the need to investigate stress interactions prior to multi-stress acceleration planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Ekene Gabriel Okafor & Whit Vinson & David Ryan Huitink, 2023. "Effect of Stress Interaction on Multi-Stress Accelerated Life Test Plan: Assessment Based on Particle Swarm Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-26, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3451-:d:1067438
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3451/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3451/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yada Zhu & Elsayed Elsayed, 2013. "Optimal design of accelerated life testing plans under progressive censoring," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(11), pages 1176-1187.
    2. Ali M. Eltamaly, 2021. "A Novel Strategy for Optimal PSO Control Parameters Determination for PV Energy Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-28, January.
    3. Elsayed, E.A. & Zhang, Hao, 2007. "Design of PH-based accelerated life testing plans under multiple-stress-type," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(3), pages 286-292.
    4. Yao Liu & Yashun Wang & Zhengwei Fan & Xun Chen & Chunhua Zhang & Yuanyuan Tan, 2020. "A new universal multi-stress acceleration model and multi-parameter estimation method based on particle swarm optimization," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(6), pages 764-778, December.
    5. Yada Zhu & Elsayed A. Elsayed, 2013. "Design of accelerated life testing plans under multiple stresses," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 60(6), pages 468-478, September.
    6. Lin, Kunsong & Chen, Yunxia & Xu, Dan, 2017. "Reliability assessment model considering heterogeneous population in a multiple stresses accelerated test," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 134-143.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Yao & Wang, Yashun & Fan, Zhengwei & Bai, Guanghan & Chen, Xun, 2021. "Reliability modeling and a statistical inference method of accelerated degradation testing with multiple stresses and dependent competing failure processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    2. Ye, Xuerong & Hu, Yifan & Zheng, Bokai & Chen, Cen & Zhai, Guofu, 2022. "A new class of multi-stress acceleration models with interaction effects and its extension to accelerated degradation modelling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    3. Wu, Shuo-Jye & Huang, Syuan-Rong, 2017. "Planning two or more level constant-stress accelerated life tests with competing risks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 1-8.
    4. Zhang, Hanxiao & Li, Yan-Fu, 2022. "Integrated optimization of test case selection and sequencing for reliability testing of the mainboard of Internet backbone routers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(1), pages 183-194.
    5. Wu, Shuo-Jye & Hsu, Chu-Chun & Huang, Syuan-Rong, 2020. "Optimal designs and reliability sampling plans for one-shot devices with cost considerations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    6. Moustafa, Kassem & Hu, Zhen & Mourelatos, Zissimos P. & Baseski, Igor & Majcher, Monica, 2021. "System reliability analysis using component-level and system-level accelerated life testing," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    7. Yao Liu & Yashun Wang & Zhengwei Fan & Xun Chen & Chunhua Zhang & Yuanyuan Tan, 2020. "A new universal multi-stress acceleration model and multi-parameter estimation method based on particle swarm optimization," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(6), pages 764-778, December.
    8. Muhannad Alaraj & Astitva Kumar & Ibrahim Alsaidan & Mohammad Rizwan & Majid Jamil, 2022. "An Advanced and Robust Approach to Maximize Solar Photovoltaic Power Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-20, June.
    9. Zhaojun Yang & Xiaoxu Li & Chuanhai Chen & Hongxun Zhao & Dingyu Yang & Jinyan Guo & Wei Luo, 2019. "Reliability assessment of the spindle systems with a competing risk model," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(2), pages 226-234, April.
    10. Tian, Zhigang & Liao, Haitao, 2011. "Condition based maintenance optimization for multi-component systems using proportional hazards model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(5), pages 581-589.
    11. Lin, Kunsong & Chen, Yunxia, 2021. "Analysis of two-dimensional warranty data considering global and local dependence of heterogeneous marginals," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    12. Han, David & Bai, Tianyu, 2020. "Design optimization of a simple step-stress accelerated life test – Contrast between continuous and interval inspections with non-uniform step durations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    13. Ao, Dan & Hu, Zhen & Mahadevan, Sankaran, 2017. "Design of validation experiments for life prediction models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 22-33.
    14. Askhat Diveev & Elizaveta Shmalko, 2023. "Adaptive Synthesized Control for Solving the Optimal Control Problem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-18, September.
    15. Gupta, Sanjib Kumar & Bhattacharya, Debasis, 2022. "Non-parametric estimation of bivariate reliability from incomplete two-dimensional warranty data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    16. Marcus Evandro Teixeira Souza Junior & Luiz Carlos Gomes Freitas, 2022. "Power Electronics for Modern Sustainable Power Systems: Distributed Generation, Microgrids and Smart Grids—A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-22, March.
    17. Phiraphat Antarasee & Suttichai Premrudeepreechacharn & Apirat Siritaratiwat & Sirote Khunkitti, 2022. "Optimal Design of Electric Vehicle Fast-Charging Station’s Structure Using Metaheuristic Algorithms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-22, December.
    18. Cheng, Yao & Liao, Haitao & Huang, Zhiyi, 2021. "Optimal degradation-based hybrid double-stage acceptance sampling plan for a heterogeneous product," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    19. Hunjra, Ahmed Imran & Azam, Muhammad & Bruna, Maria Giuseppina & Verhoeven, Peter & Al-Faryan, Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh, 2022. "Sustainable development: The impact of political risk, macroeconomic policy uncertainty and ethnic conflict," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    20. Liu, Di & Wang, Shaoping, 2021. "Reliability estimation from lifetime testing data and degradation testing data with measurement error based on evidential variable and Wiener process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3451-:d:1067438. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.