IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p2495-d1051699.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

FSPV-Grid System for an Industrial Subsection with PV Price Sensitivity Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Tanu Rizvi

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, Shri Shankaracharya Technical Campus, Bhilai 490001, Chhattisgarh, India)

  • Satya Prakash Dubey

    (Vice-Chancellor, ICFAI University, Raipur 490042, Chhattisgarh, India)

  • Nagendra Tripathi

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, Bhilai Institute of Technology, Durg 490006, Chhattisgarh, India)

  • Gautam Srivastava

    (Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Brandon University, Brandon, MB R7A 6A9, Canada
    Research Centre for Interneural Computing, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan
    Department of Computer Science and Math, Lebanese American University, Beirut 1102, Lebanon)

  • Satya Prakash Makhija

    (School of Engineering & Research, ITM University, Raipur 490042, Chhattisgarh, India)

  • Md. Khaja Mohiddin

    (Department of Electronics and Telecommunication Engineering, Bhilai Institute of Technology, Raipur 490042, Chhattisgarh, India)

Abstract

Renewable energy sources, particularly solar photovoltaic generation, now dominate generation options. Solar generation advancements have resulted in floating solar photovoltaics, also known as FSPV systems. FSPV systems are one of the fastest growing technologies today, providing a viable replacement for ground-mounted PV systems due to their flexibility and low land-space requirement. This paper presents a systematic approach for implementing a proposed FSPV–grid integrated system in Bhilai Steel Plant’s (BSP) subsections. BSP is a steel manufacturing plant located in Bhilai, Chhattisgarh, and the FSPV system has the potential to generate sufficient energy by accessing two of its reservoirs. The system was simulated in HOMER Pro software, which provided the FSPV system power estimations, area requirements, net present cost (NPC), levelized cost of energy (LCOE), production summary, grid purchasing/selling, IRR, ROI, paybacks and pollutant emissions. A sensitivity analysis for a hike in PV prices globally due to a shortage in poly silicone in international markets during the fiscal year 2021–2022 was undertaken for the proposed FSPV–grid system. Here, the authors considered hikes in the PV price of 1%, 9%and 18% respectively, since the maximum percentage increase in PV prices globally is 18%. The authors also compared the proposed FSPV–grid system to the existing grid-only system for two sections of the BSP and the results obtained showed that the NPC and LCOE would be much lower in the case of the FSPV–grid system than the grid-only system. However, with changes in the percentage hike in PV prices, the NPC and LCOE were found to increase due to changes in the proportion of FSPV–grid systems in production. The pollutant emissions were the minimum in the case of the FSPV–grid system, whereas they were the highest in the case of the existing grid-only system. Furthermore, the payback analysis indicated that the minimum ROI for the above-defined construction would be fully covered in 15.81 years with the nominal 1% pricing for FSPV–grid generation. Therefore, the overall results suggest that the FSPV–grid system has the potential to be a perfect alternative solar energy source that can meet the current electrical energy requirements of the steel manufacturing industry with nominal pricing better than the existing grid-only system, as well as addressing economic constraints and conferring environmental benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Tanu Rizvi & Satya Prakash Dubey & Nagendra Tripathi & Gautam Srivastava & Satya Prakash Makhija & Md. Khaja Mohiddin, 2023. "FSPV-Grid System for an Industrial Subsection with PV Price Sensitivity Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2495-:d:1051699
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2495/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2495/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sahu, Alok & Yadav, Neha & Sudhakar, K., 2016. "Floating photovoltaic power plant: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 815-824.
    2. Lee, Nathan & Grunwald, Ursula & Rosenlieb, Evan & Mirletz, Heather & Aznar, Alexandra & Spencer, Robert & Cox, Sadie, 2020. "Hybrid floating solar photovoltaics-hydropower systems: Benefits and global assessment of technical potential," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1415-1427.
    3. Jinyoung Song & Yosoon Choi, 2016. "Analysis of the Potential for Use of Floating Photovoltaic Systems on Mine Pit Lakes: Case Study at the Ssangyong Open-Pit Limestone Mine in Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-13, February.
    4. Zhou, Yanlai & Chang, Fi-John & Chang, Li-Chiu & Lee, Wei-De & Huang, Angela & Xu, Chong-Yu & Guo, Shenglian, 2020. "An advanced complementary scheme of floating photovoltaic and hydropower generation flourishing water-food-energy nexus synergies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ma, Chao & Liu, Zhao, 2022. "Water-surface photovoltaics: Performance, utilization, and interactions with water eco-environment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    2. Sika Gadzanku & Heather Mirletz & Nathan Lee & Jennifer Daw & Adam Warren, 2021. "Benefits and Critical Knowledge Gaps in Determining the Role of Floating Photovoltaics in the Energy-Water-Food Nexus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Padilha Campos Lopes, Mariana & Nogueira, Tainan & Santos, Alberto José Leandro & Castelo Branco, David & Pouran, Hamid, 2022. "Technical potential of floating photovoltaic systems on artificial water bodies in Brazil," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 1023-1033.
    4. Kowsar, Abu & Hassan, Mahedi & Rana, Md Tasnim & Haque, Nawshad & Faruque, Md Hasan & Ahsan, Saifuddin & Alam, Firoz, 2023. "Optimization and techno-economic assessment of 50 MW floating solar power plant on Hakaluki marsh land in Bangladesh," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    5. Ranjbaran, Parisa & Yousefi, Hossein & Gharehpetian, G.B. & Astaraei, Fatemeh Razi, 2019. "A review on floating photovoltaic (FPV) power generation units," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 332-347.
    6. Alexander E. Cagle & Alona Armstrong & Giles Exley & Steven M. Grodsky & Jordan Macknick & John Sherwin & Rebecca R. Hernandez, 2020. "The Land Sparing, Water Surface Use Efficiency, and Water Surface Transformation of Floating Photovoltaic Solar Energy Installations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-22, October.
    7. Laura Essak & Aritra Ghosh, 2022. "Floating Photovoltaics: A Review," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-18, August.
    8. Jangwon Suh & Yonghae Jang & Yosoon Choi, 2019. "Comparison of Electric Power Output Observed and Estimated from Floating Photovoltaic Systems: A Case Study on the Hapcheon Dam, Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, December.
    9. Sulaeman, Samer & Brown, Erik & Quispe-Abad, Raul & Müller, Norbert, 2021. "Floating PV system as an alternative pathway to the amazon dam underproduction," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    10. Fereshtehpour, Mohammad & Javidi Sabbaghian, Reza & Farrokhi, Ali & Jovein, Ehsan Bahrami & Ebrahimi Sarindizaj, Elham, 2021. "Evaluation of factors governing the use of floating solar system: A study on Iran’s important water infrastructures," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 1171-1187.
    11. Boduch, Andrzej & Mik, Krzysztof & Castro, Rui & Zawadzki, Paweł, 2022. "Technical and economic assessment of a 1 MWp floating photovoltaic system in Polish conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 983-994.
    12. Erdem Cuce & Pinar Mert Cuce & Shaik Saboor & Aritra Ghosh & Yahya Sheikhnejad, 2022. "Floating PVs in Terms of Power Generation, Environmental Aspects, Market Potential, and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-25, February.
    13. Claus, R. & López, M., 2022. "Key issues in the design of floating photovoltaic structures for the marine environment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    14. Adimas Pradityo Sukarso & Kyung Nam Kim, 2020. "Cooling Effect on the Floating Solar PV: Performance and Economic Analysis on the Case of West Java Province in Indonesia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-16, April.
    15. Nobre, Regina & Boulêtreau, Stéphanie & Colas, Fanny & Azemar, Frederic & Tudesque, Loïc & Parthuisot, Nathalie & Favriou, Pierre & Cucherousset, Julien, 2023. "Potential ecological impacts of floating photovoltaics on lake biodiversity and ecosystem functioning," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    16. Moraes, Camile A. & Valadão, Giovana F. & Renato, Natalia S. & Botelho, Daniel F. & Oliveira, Augusto C. L. de & Aleman, Catariny C. & Cunha, Fernando F., 2022. "Floating photovoltaic plants as an electricity supply option in the Tocantins-Araguaia basin," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 264-277.
    17. Evgeny Solomin & Evgeny Sirotkin & Erdem Cuce & Shanmuga Priya Selvanathan & Sudhakar Kumarasamy, 2021. "Hybrid Floating Solar Plant Designs: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-25, May.
    18. Mohamad Al-Widyan & Mohammad Khasawneh & Muna Abu-Dalo, 2021. "Potential of Floating Photovoltaic Technology and Their Effects on Energy Output, Water Quality and Supply in Jordan," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-13, December.
    19. Vidović, V. & Krajačić, G. & Matak, N. & Stunjek, G. & Mimica, M., 2023. "Review of the potentials for implementation of floating solar panels on lakes and water reservoirs," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    20. Tercan, Emre & Dereli, Mehmet Ali & Saracoglu, Burak Omer, 2022. "Location alternatives generation and elimination of floatovoltaics with virtual power plant designs," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 1150-1163.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2495-:d:1051699. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.