IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2019i1p276-d303142.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Electric Power Output Observed and Estimated from Floating Photovoltaic Systems: A Case Study on the Hapcheon Dam, Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Jangwon Suh

    (Department of Energy and Mineral Resources Engineering, Kangwon National University, Samcheok 25913, Korea)

  • Yonghae Jang

    (Korea Water Resources Corporation (K-Water), Daejeon 34045, Korea)

  • Yosoon Choi

    (Department of Energy Resources Engineering, Pukyong National University, Busan 48513, Korea)

Abstract

An interest in floating photovoltaic (PV) is growing drastically worldwide. To evaluate the feasibility of floating PV projects, an accurate estimation of electric power output (EPO) is a crucial first step. This study estimates the EPO of a floating PV system and compares it with the actual EPO observed at the Hapcheon Dam, Korea. Typical meteorological year data and system design parameters were entered into System Advisor Model (SAM) software to estimate the hourly and monthly EPOs. The monthly estimated EPOs were lower than the monthly observed EPOs. This result is ascribed to the cooling effect of the water environment on the floating PV module, which makes the floating PV efficiency higher than overland PV efficiency. Unfortunately, most commercial PV software, including the SAM, was unable to consider this effect in estimating EPO. The error results showed it was possible to estimate the monthly EPOs with an error of less than 15% (simply by simulation) and 9% (when considering the cooling effect: 110% of the estimated monthly EPOs). This indicates that the approach of using empirical results can provide more reliable estimation of EPO in the feasibility assessment stage of floating PV projects. Furthermore, it is necessary to develop simulation software dedicated to the floating PV system.

Suggested Citation

  • Jangwon Suh & Yonghae Jang & Yosoon Choi, 2019. "Comparison of Electric Power Output Observed and Estimated from Floating Photovoltaic Systems: A Case Study on the Hapcheon Dam, Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2019:i:1:p:276-:d:303142
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/1/276/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/1/276/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cazzaniga, R. & Cicu, M. & Rosa-Clot, M. & Rosa-Clot, P. & Tina, G.M. & Ventura, C., 2018. "Floating photovoltaic plants: Performance analysis and design solutions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 1730-1741.
    2. Jangwon Suh & Yosoon Choi, 2017. "Methods for Converting Monthly Total Irradiance Data into Hourly Data to Estimate Electric Power Production from Photovoltaic Systems: A Comparative Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-19, July.
    3. Antonio Nesticò & Francesco Sica, 2017. "The sustainability of urban renewal projects: a model for economic multi-criteria analysis," Journal of Property Investment & Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 35(4), pages 397-409, July.
    4. Song, Jinyoung & Choi, Yosoon, 2015. "Design of photovoltaic systems to power aerators for natural purification of acid mine drainage," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 759-766.
    5. Sahu, Alok & Yadav, Neha & Sudhakar, K., 2016. "Floating photovoltaic power plant: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 815-824.
    6. Antonio Nesticò & Piera Somma, 2019. "Comparative Analysis of Multi-Criteria Methods for the Enhancement of Historical Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-19, August.
    7. Nematollahi, Omid & Kim, Kyung Chun, 2017. "A feasibility study of solar energy in South Korea," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 566-579.
    8. Sun-Hee Kim & Soon-Jong Yoon & Wonchang Choi & Ki-Bong Choi, 2016. "Application of Floating Photovoltaic Energy Generation Systems in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-9, December.
    9. Chih-Chiang Wei, 2019. "Evaluation of Photovoltaic Power Generation by Using Deep Learning in Solar Panels Installed in Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-18, September.
    10. Unknown, 2016. "Energy for Sustainable Development," Conference Proceedings 253270, Guru Arjan Dev Institute of Development Studies (IDSAsr).
    11. Jinyoung Song & Yosoon Choi, 2016. "Analysis of the Potential for Use of Floating Photovoltaic Systems on Mine Pit Lakes: Case Study at the Ssangyong Open-Pit Limestone Mine in Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-13, February.
    12. Yosoon Choi & Jinyoung Song, 2016. "Sustainable Development of Abandoned Mine Areas Using Renewable Energy Systems: A Case Study of the Photovoltaic Potential Assessment at the Tailings Dam of Abandoned Sangdong Mine, Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-12, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maja Muftić Dedović & Samir Avdaković & Adnan Mujezinović & Nedis Dautbašić, 2020. "Integration of PV into the Sarajevo Canton Energy System-Air Quality and Heating Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-28, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mokhinabonu Mardonova & Yosoon Choi, 2019. "Assessment of Photovoltaic Potential of Mining Sites in Uzbekistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-13, May.
    2. Ranjbaran, Parisa & Yousefi, Hossein & Gharehpetian, G.B. & Astaraei, Fatemeh Razi, 2019. "A review on floating photovoltaic (FPV) power generation units," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 332-347.
    3. Ma, Chao & Liu, Zhao, 2022. "Water-surface photovoltaics: Performance, utilization, and interactions with water eco-environment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    4. Rômulo de Oliveira Azevêdo & Paulo Rotela Junior & Luiz Célio Souza Rocha & Gianfranco Chicco & Giancarlo Aquila & Rogério Santana Peruchi, 2020. "Identification and Analysis of Impact Factors on the Economic Feasibility of Photovoltaic Energy Investments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-40, September.
    5. Jangwon Suh & Yosoon Choi, 2017. "Methods for Converting Monthly Total Irradiance Data into Hourly Data to Estimate Electric Power Production from Photovoltaic Systems: A Comparative Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-19, July.
    6. Ray-Yeng Yang & Sheng-Hung Yu, 2021. "A Study on a Floating Solar Energy System Applied in an Intertidal Zone," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-32, November.
    7. Fereshtehpour, Mohammad & Javidi Sabbaghian, Reza & Farrokhi, Ali & Jovein, Ehsan Bahrami & Ebrahimi Sarindizaj, Elham, 2021. "Evaluation of factors governing the use of floating solar system: A study on Iran’s important water infrastructures," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 1171-1187.
    8. Boduch, Andrzej & Mik, Krzysztof & Castro, Rui & Zawadzki, Paweł, 2022. "Technical and economic assessment of a 1 MWp floating photovoltaic system in Polish conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 983-994.
    9. Kulat, Muhammed Imran & Tosun, Kursad & Karaveli, Abdullah Bugrahan & Yucel, Ismail & Akinoglu, Bulent Gultekin, 2023. "A sound potential against energy dependency and climate change challenges: Floating photovoltaics on water reservoirs of Turkey," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 694-709.
    10. Lee, Nathan & Grunwald, Ursula & Rosenlieb, Evan & Mirletz, Heather & Aznar, Alexandra & Spencer, Robert & Cox, Sadie, 2020. "Hybrid floating solar photovoltaics-hydropower systems: Benefits and global assessment of technical potential," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1415-1427.
    11. Erdem Cuce & Pinar Mert Cuce & Shaik Saboor & Aritra Ghosh & Yahya Sheikhnejad, 2022. "Floating PVs in Terms of Power Generation, Environmental Aspects, Market Potential, and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-25, February.
    12. Claus, R. & López, M., 2022. "Key issues in the design of floating photovoltaic structures for the marine environment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    13. Katalin Bódis & Ioannis Kougias & Nigel Taylor & Arnulf Jäger-Waldau, 2019. "Solar Photovoltaic Electricity Generation: A Lifeline for the European Coal Regions in Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-14, July.
    14. Rafi Zahedi & Parisa Ranjbaran & Gevork B. Gharehpetian & Fazel Mohammadi & Roya Ahmadiahangar, 2021. "Cleaning of Floating Photovoltaic Systems: A Critical Review on Approaches from Technical and Economic Perspectives," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-25, April.
    15. Exley, G. & Hernandez, R.R. & Page, T. & Chipps, M. & Gambro, S. & Hersey, M. & Lake, R. & Zoannou, K.-S. & Armstrong, A., 2021. "Scientific and stakeholder evidence-based assessment: Ecosystem response to floating solar photovoltaics and implications for sustainability," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    16. Choi, Yosoon & Song, Jinyoung, 2017. "Review of photovoltaic and wind power systems utilized in the mining industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 1386-1391.
    17. Jangwon Suh & Jeffrey R. S. Brownson, 2016. "Solar Farm Suitability Using Geographic Information System Fuzzy Sets and Analytic Hierarchy Processes: Case Study of Ulleung Island, Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-24, August.
    18. Sulaeman, Samer & Brown, Erik & Quispe-Abad, Raul & Müller, Norbert, 2021. "Floating PV system as an alternative pathway to the amazon dam underproduction," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    19. Roberto Gerundo & Antonio Nesticò & Alessandra Marra & Maria Carotenuto, 2020. "Peripheralization Risk Mitigation: A Decision Support Model to Evaluate Urban Regeneration Programs Effectiveness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-19, September.
    20. Małgorzata Fedorczak-Cisak & Anna Kotowicz & Elżbieta Radziszewska-Zielina & Bartłomiej Sroka & Tadeusz Tatara & Krzysztof Barnaś, 2020. "Multi-Criteria Optimisation of an Experimental Complex of Single-Family Nearly Zero-Energy Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-30, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2019:i:1:p:276-:d:303142. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.