IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p2348-d1048574.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of ESG on Brand Trust and Word of Mouth in Food and Beverage Companies: Focusing on Jeju Island Tourists

Author

Listed:
  • Gum-Kwang Bae

    (Department of Foodservice Management, Dong-Eui University, Busan 47340, Republic of Korea)

  • Sang-Mook Lee

    (Department of Tourism Management, Jeju National University, Jeonju 63243, Republic of Korea)

  • Bui-Kim Luan

    (Hospitality & Tourism Institute, Duy Tan University, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam)

Abstract

This study conducted to verfiy the structural causal relationship between the ESG attributes of food and beverage companies, trust, and word of mouth (WOM) as perceived by consumers visiting Jeju Island. The present study used respondents who understand ESG management and selected a representative ESG management company in the food service business (e.g., Starbucks Reusable Cup or Samdasoo Unlabeled, etc.). A survey was requested from an online survey company, and total 521 participants were selected for the data analysis. The IBM 24.0 program and AMOS 22.0 program was employed to conduct statistic analysis. Present study demonstrated as follows. First, as a result of the hypothesis testing of the relationship between the three attributes of ESG and brand trust, the environmental factor (E) and the social factor (S) have a significant positive (+) effect on brand trust. Second, hypothesis testing on the relationship between the three attributes of ESG and the influence of WOM showed that environmental factors and social factors were critical antecedents of WOM. Next, verifying the hypothesis between brand trust and WOM, brand trust had a significant positive (+) effect on WOM. By verifying the hypotheses, the current study identified a critical relationship between the ESG management attributes of food and beverage companies and customers’ brand trust and WOM. These founding showed differences in the variables that directly affect brand trust and WOM among the ESG attributes recognized by tourists in Jeju Island about Jeju-based food and beverage companies practicing ESG management. Furthermore, it was confirmed that the value formed by these food and beverage companies’ ESG management activities could directly affect consumers’ brand trust and WOM intentions. Hence, the study intends to expand the range of ESG-related academic views and suggest meaningful marketing implications for various food and beverage companies that want to practice ESG management.

Suggested Citation

  • Gum-Kwang Bae & Sang-Mook Lee & Bui-Kim Luan, 2023. "The Impact of ESG on Brand Trust and Word of Mouth in Food and Beverage Companies: Focusing on Jeju Island Tourists," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-14, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2348-:d:1048574
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2348/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2348/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fatemi, Ali & Glaum, Martin & Kaiser, Stefanie, 2018. "ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 45-64.
    2. Jana Majerova & Wlodzimierz Sroka & Anna Krizanova & Lubica Gajanova & George Lazaroiu & Margareta Nadanyiova, 2020. "Sustainable Brand Management of Alimentary Goods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, January.
    3. Rezaee, Zabihollah, 2016. "Business sustainability research: A theoretical and integrated perspective," Journal of Accounting Literature, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 48-64.
    4. João Guerreiro & Mariana Pacheco, 2021. "How Green Trust, Consumer Brand Engagement and Green Word-of-Mouth Mediate Purchasing Intentions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-13, July.
    5. Tai-Wei Chang & Yen-Li Yeh & Hung-Xin Li, 2020. "How to Shape an Organization’s Sustainable Green Management Performance: The Mediation Effect of Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-19, November.
    6. Hee-Kyung Koh & Regina Burnasheva & Yong Gu Suh, 2022. "Perceived ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) and Consumers’ Responses: The Mediating Role of Brand Credibility, Brand Image, and Perceived Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-15, April.
    7. Chen, Chun-Da & Su, Ching-Hui (Joan) & Chen, Ming-Hsiang, 2022. "Understanding how ESG-focused airlines reduce the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on stock returns," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    8. Jun-Ho Bae, 2022. "Developing ESG Evaluation Guidelines for the Tourism Sector: With a Focus on the Hotel Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-17, December.
    9. Laura Mervelskemper & Daniel Streit, 2017. "Enhancing Market Valuation of ESG Performance: Is Integrated Reporting Keeping its Promise?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(4), pages 536-549, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ding, Jiantao & Yin, Yingkai & Kuang, Jinsong & Ding, Dezhi & Madsen, Dag.Øivind & Yang, Kunyu, 2024. "The impact of enterprise digital transformation on financial mismatch: Empirical evidence from listed companies in China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    2. Pan-Ting Song & Batsuuri Oyunbazar & Tae-Won Kang, 2024. "The Impact of Agricultural Food Retailers’ ESG Activities on Purchase Intention: The Mediating Effect of Consumer ESG Perception," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-16, September.
    3. Heekyun Oh, 2024. "The Moderating Role of ESG Administration on the Relationship between Tourism Activities and Carbon Emissions: A Case Study of Basic Local Governments in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-26, June.
    4. Yingyu Li & Heqing Wang, 2024. "Environmental, Social and Governance Performance on Brand Value in the Context of “Dual Carbon”: The Mediating Effect of R&D Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-15, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Riccardo Santamaria & Francesco Paolone & Nicola Cucari & Luca Dezi, 2021. "Non‐financial strategy disclosure and environmental, social and governance score: Insight from a configurational approach," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 1993-2007, May.
    2. Pruthiranjan Dwibedi & Debasis Pahi & Antarjyami Sahu, 2024. "Mapping the landscape of environmental, social and governance research: A bibliometric analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 3745-3767, September.
    3. Denny IRAWAN & Tatsuyoshi OKIMOTO, 2021. "How Do ESG Performance and Awareness Affect Firm Value and Corporate Overinvestment?," Discussion papers 21033, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    4. Hadiqa Ahmad & Muhammad Yaqub & Seung Hwan Lee, 2024. "Environmental-, social-, and governance-related factors for business investment and sustainability: a scientometric review of global trends," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 2965-2987, February.
    5. Rezaee, Zabihollah & Dou, Huan & Zhang, Huili, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility and earnings quality: Evidence from China," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    6. Zhongjuan Sun & Jialin Feng & Yikai Yuan & Jiamu Sun, 2025. "How does parent firms' ESG disclosure affect overseas subsidiary financial performance? The case of Chinese multinationals," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(1), pages 128-165, February.
    7. Khan, Muhammad Arif, 2022. "ESG disclosure and Firm performance: A bibliometric and meta analysis," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    8. Ren, Fangrong & Liu, Xiaoyan & Charles, Vincent & Zhao, Xin & Balsalobre-Lorente, Daniel, 2025. "Integrated efficiency and influencing factors analysis of ESG and market performance in thermal power enterprises in China: A hybrid perspective based on parallel DEA and a benchmark model," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    9. Ahmed Saber Moussa & Mahmoud Elmarzouky & Doaa Shohaieb, 2024. "Green Governance: How ESG Initiatives Drive Financial Performance in UK Firms?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-25, December.
    10. Raymond Kwong & Man Lung Jonathan Kwok & Helen S. M. Wong, 2023. "Green FinTech Innovation as a Future Research Direction: A Bibliometric Analysis on Green Finance and FinTech," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-27, October.
    11. Juan Pineiro-Chousa & Noelia Romero-Castro & Marcos Vizcaíno-González, 2019. "Inclusions in and Exclusions from the S&P 500 Environmental and Socially Responsible Index: A Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-31, February.
    12. Salvatore Esposito De Falco & Giuseppe Scandurra & Antonio Thomas, 2021. "How stakeholders affect the pursuit of the Environmental, Social, and Governance. Evidence from innovative small and medium enterprises," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5), pages 1528-1539, September.
    13. Hema Diwan & Binilkumar Amarayil Sreeraman, 2024. "From financial reporting to ESG reporting: a bibliometric analysis of the evolution in corporate sustainability disclosures," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(6), pages 13769-13805, June.
    14. Ahmad Al-Hiyari & Mohamed Chakib Kolsi, 2024. "How do Stock Market Participants Value ESG Performance? Evidence from Middle Eastern and North African Countries," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 25(4), pages 934-956, August.
    15. Nuradhi Kalpani Jayasiri & Sriyalatha Kumarasinghe & Rakesh Pandey, 2023. "12 years of integrated reporting: A review of research," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(2), pages 2187-2243, June.
    16. Abdullah Jihad Rabaya & Norman Mohd Saleh, 2022. "The moderating effect of IR framework adoption on the relationship between environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure and a firm's competitive advantage," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 2037-2055, February.
    17. Rezaee, Zabihollah & Homayoun, Saeid & Poursoleyman, Ehsan & Rezaee, Nick J., 2023. "Comparative analysis of environmental, social, and governance disclosures," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    18. Małgorzata Janicka & Artur Sajnóg, 2022. "The ESG Reporting of EU Public Companies—Does the Company’s Capitalisation Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-17, April.
    19. Ng, Anthony C. & Rezaee, Zabihollah, 2020. "Business sustainability factors and stock price informativeness," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    20. Gülfen Tuna & Kaan Türkay & Saim Saner Çiftyildiz & Hülya Çelik, 2024. "The impact of financial tools in environmental degradation management: the relationship between Co2 emission and ESG funds," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(6), pages 14941-14956, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2348-:d:1048574. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.