IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p1944-d1041559.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

River Sand and Gravel Mining Monitoring Using Remote Sensing and UAVs

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Constantin Diaconu

    (Research Center for Integrated Analysis and Territorial Management, University of Bucharest, 4-12 Regina Elisabeta Avenue, 030018 Bucharest, Romania
    Buzău-Ialomița Water Administration, 20 Bis Bucegi Street, 120208 Buzău, Romania)

  • Paschalis D. Koutalakis

    (Geomorphology, Edaphology and Riparian Areas Laboratory (GERi Lab), Department of Forestry and Natural Environment Science, International Hellenic University, University Campus in Drama, 66100 Drama, Greece)

  • Georgios T. Gkiatas

    (Geomorphology, Edaphology and Riparian Areas Laboratory (GERi Lab), Department of Forestry and Natural Environment Science, International Hellenic University, University Campus in Drama, 66100 Drama, Greece)

  • Gabriel Vasile Dascalu

    (Simion Mehedinți “Nature and Sustainable Development” Doctoral School, University of Bucharest, 061071 Bucharest, Romania)

  • George N. Zaimes

    (Geomorphology, Edaphology and Riparian Areas Laboratory (GERi Lab), Department of Forestry and Natural Environment Science, International Hellenic University, University Campus in Drama, 66100 Drama, Greece
    Unesco Chair Con-Ε-Ect, 66100 Drama, Greece)

Abstract

The development of methodologies for analyzing the evolution and pressures exerted on the river channel network is one of the main concerns of researchers today. The assessment of natural or artificial changes of river channels and beds plays an important role in environmental protection, but also in the implementation of integrated water resource management plans. Given the episodic and dynamic nature of river bank and bed erosion, along with the difficulty of reaching certain reaches, a methodological approach that uses aerial imagery, initially from satellite sources and afterwards from unmanned aerial vehicles, is proposed. This approach was utilized in a perennial river in Romania but also in an ephemeral torrent channel in Greece, in order to test the prevalent types of hydrographic network in the Mediterranean and Black Sea region. The methodology used was able to identify the location and the volume of the bed material extracted and the time frame in which it occurred. These encouraging results showcase an accurate but also relevantly low-cost monitoring method for illegal anthropogenic activities that can be easily adopted by the responsible authorities. The adoption of the method will contribute to the more efficient monitoring of river protection, by accurately and timely identifying areas of illegal river bed extraction that will enable authorities to enforce European Union and national legislation.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Constantin Diaconu & Paschalis D. Koutalakis & Georgios T. Gkiatas & Gabriel Vasile Dascalu & George N. Zaimes, 2023. "River Sand and Gravel Mining Monitoring Using Remote Sensing and UAVs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-17, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:1944-:d:1041559
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/1944/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/1944/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marianthi V. Podimata & Panayotis C. Yannopoulos, 2016. "A conceptual approach to model sand-gravel extraction from rivers based on a game theory perspective," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(1), pages 120-141, January.
    2. Bringezu, Stefan, 2002. "Towards sustainable resource management in the European Union," Wuppertal Papers 121, Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy.
    3. Agnieszka Cienciała & Szymon Sobura & Katarzyna Sobolewska-Mikulska, 2022. "Optimising Land Consolidation by Implementing UAV Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-19, April.
    4. Tiess, Guenter, 2010. "Minerals policy in Europe: Some recent developments," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 190-198, September.
    5. Costea, Gabriela & Pusch, Martin T. & Bănăduc, Doru & Cosmoiu, Diana & Curtean-Bănăduc, Angela, 2021. "A review of hydropower plants in Romania: Distribution, current knowledge, and their effects on fish in headwater streams," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    6. Paschalis D. Koutalakis & Ourania A. Tzoraki & Georgios I. Prazioutis & Georgios T. Gkiatas & George N. Zaimes, 2021. "Can Drones Map Earth Cracks? Landslide Measurements in North Greece Using UAV Photogrammetry for Nature-Based Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mehmet Yavuz & Mustafa Tufekcioglu, 2023. "Assessment of Flood-Induced Geomorphic Changes in Sidere Creek of the Mountainous Basin Using Small UAV-Based Imagery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-21, July.
    2. Yi Zhou & Chaozhu Li & Weilong Yang, 2025. "Dynamic Assessment of the Eco-Environmental Effects of Open-Pit Mining: A Case Study in a Coal Mining Area (Inner Mongolia, Western China)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-21, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pauli Lappi & Markku Ollikainen, 2019. "Optimal Environmental Policy for a Mine Under Polluting Waste Rocks and Stock Pollution," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 73(1), pages 133-158, May.
    2. Jiang, Meihui & An, Haizhong & Guan, Qing & Sun, Xiaoqi, 2018. "Global embodied mineral flow between industrial sectors: A network perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 192-201.
    3. Hongmei Fei & Ruru Liu & Leilei Dong & Zhaohui Du & Xuening Liu & Tao Luo & Jie Zhou, 2025. "Three-Dimensional Path Planning for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Based on Hybrid Multi-Strategy Dung Beetle Optimization Algorithm," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-33, May.
    4. Lili Zhang & Baoqing Hu & Ze Zhang & Gaodou Liang & Simin Huang, 2023. "Comprehensive Evaluation of Ecological-Economic Value of Guangxi Based on Land Consolidation," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-25, March.
    5. Henrik Florén & Johan Frishammar & Anton Löf & Magnus Ericsson, 2019. "Raw materials management in iron and steelmaking firms," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 32(1), pages 39-47, April.
    6. Sher, Farooq & Smječanin, Narcisa & Hrnjić, Harun & Bakunić, Emir & Sulejmanović, Jasmina, 2024. "Prospects of renewable energy potentials and development in Bosnia and Herzegovina – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PA).
    7. Nathalie Sick & Matthias Blug & Jens Leker, 2014. "The Influence of Raw Material Prices on the Development of Hydrogen Storage Materials: The Case of Metal Hydrides," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 5(4), pages 735-760, December.
    8. Radwanek-Bąk, Barbara & Sobczyk, Wiktoria & Sobczyk, Eugeniusz J., 2020. "Support for multiple criteria decisions for mineral deposits valorization and protection," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    9. Michael Tost & Gloria Ammerer & Alicja Kot-Niewiadomska & Katharina Gugerell, 2021. "Mining and Europe’s World Heritage Cultural Landscapes," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-16, February.
    10. Bartelmus, Peter & Albert, Jörg & Tschochohei, Heinrich, 2003. "Wie teuer ist (uns) die Umwelt? Zur umweltökonomischen Gesamtrechnung in Deutschland," Wuppertal Papers 128, Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy.
    11. Linda Wårell, 2021. "Mineral Deposits Safeguarding and Land Use Planning—The Importance of Creating Shared Value," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-18, April.
    12. Nieć, Marek & Galos, Krzysztof & Szamałek, Krzysztof, 2014. "Main challenges of mineral resources policy of Poland," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 93-103.
    13. Alejandro Gonzalez-Ollauri, 2022. "Sustainable Use of Nature-Based Solutions for Slope Protection and Erosion Control," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-3, February.
    14. Kasmaeeyazdi, Sara & Abdolmaleki, Mehdi & Ibrahim, Elsy & Jiang, Jingyi & Marzan, Ignacio & Rodríguez, Irene Benito, 2021. "Copernicus data to boost raw material source management: Illustrations from the RawMatCop programme," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    15. An Thinh Nguyen & Ha T. T. Pham & Toan Kim Tran & Cam Vinh Lai & Nhat Hong Vuong & Hong Nguyen & Dinh Tien Nguyen & Luc Hens, 2025. "Building indicators for trans-boundary natural resource management in the Cambodia–Laos–Vietnam Development Triangle Area based on experts’ opinion using Delphi method," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(7), pages 15755-15801, July.
    16. Collins, Benjamin C. & Kumral, Mustafa, 2020. "Game theory for analyzing and improving environmental management in the mining industry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    17. Edyta Sermet & Marek Nieć, 2021. "Not Mining Sterilization of Explored Mineral Resources. The Example of Native Sulfur Deposits in Poland Case History," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-12, March.
    18. Slávka Gałaś & Alicja Kot-Niewiadomska & Andrzej Gałaś & Julián Kondela & Blažena Wertichová, 2021. "Instruments of Mineral Deposit Safeguarding in Poland, Slovakia and Czechia—Comparative Analysis," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-38, February.
    19. Bleischwitz, Raimund, 2003. "Governance of sustainable development: Towards synergies between corporate and political governance strategies," Wuppertal Papers 132, Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy.
    20. Lopes, C. & Lisboa, V. & Carvalho, J. & Mateus, A. & Martins, L., 2018. "Challenges to access and safeguard mineral resources for society: A case study of kaolin in Portugal," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 263-284.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:1944-:d:1041559. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.