IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i2p963-d1025583.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Participatory Stakeholder Assessment for Drivers of Mangrove Loss to Prioritize Evidence-Based Conservation and Restoration in Bhitarkanika and Mahanadi Delta, India

Author

Listed:
  • Shalini Dhyani

    (CSIR-National Environmental Engineering Research Institute (NEERI), Nehru Marg, Nagpur 440020, India)

  • Jayshree Shukla

    (CSIR-National Environmental Engineering Research Institute (NEERI), Nehru Marg, Nagpur 440020, India)

  • Rakesh Kadaverugu

    (CSIR-National Environmental Engineering Research Institute (NEERI), Nehru Marg, Nagpur 440020, India)

  • Rajarshi Dasgupta

    (Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), 2108-11 Kamiyamaguchi, Hayama 240-0115, Kanagawa, Japan)

  • Muktipada Panda

    (Department of Botany, Banki (Autonomous) College, Banki 754008, India)

  • Sudip Kumar Kundu

    (Department of Public Policy, Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Manipal 576104, India)

  • Harini Santhanam

    (Department of Public Policy, Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Manipal 576104, India)

  • Paras R. Pujari

    (CSIR-National Environmental Engineering Research Institute (NEERI), Nehru Marg, Nagpur 440020, India)

  • Pankaj Kumar

    (Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), 2108-11 Kamiyamaguchi, Hayama 240-0115, Kanagawa, Japan)

  • Shizuka Hashimoto

    (Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), 2108-11 Kamiyamaguchi, Hayama 240-0115, Kanagawa, Japan)

Abstract

In recent times, environmental stewardship of mangroves has provided the impetus to protect and restore these ecosystems for their inherent ability to protect coastal regions from climate change, sequester carbon dioxide as rich blue carbon, and support human well-being through a multitude of ecosystem services. Participatory stakeholder assessment, as a part of the present study, integrated local stakeholder perspectives in assessing drivers of mangrove loss in Bhitarkanika and Mahanadi delta, Odisha, providing empirical evidence through a mixed-method approach. The use of a Likert scale provided the methodology to develop a single composite variable as the best measure of central tendency. In total, 27.5% of the respondents were locals and were living close to the study area for generations, whereas the other 72.5% represented researchers, academics, and forest department officials. Stakeholder responses at the ground level indicated that Bhitarkanika and Mahanadi delta were facing increased frequency of extreme climatic events followed, by aquaculture and other land-use changes, which can be considered potential drivers causing mangrove loss. Co-development of future scenarios by integrating concerns of all the stakeholders emerged as a potential solution to effectively address the trade-offs arising from local anthropogenic interferences, as well as large-scale developmental activities. This study highlights the need for convergence of multi-disciplinary knowledge from diverse stakeholder groups, including traditional and indigenous knowledge, for the purpose of developing accurate plausible alternative scenarios. Interactive governance and incentivization approaches, along with alternative livelihood opportunities, are proposed as the means to improve conservation and restoration in the region based on the present study. Understanding of the coupled socio-ecological system and its relevance is found to be critical to improve bi-directional linkages of ecosystem health and human well-being.

Suggested Citation

  • Shalini Dhyani & Jayshree Shukla & Rakesh Kadaverugu & Rajarshi Dasgupta & Muktipada Panda & Sudip Kumar Kundu & Harini Santhanam & Paras R. Pujari & Pankaj Kumar & Shizuka Hashimoto, 2023. "Participatory Stakeholder Assessment for Drivers of Mangrove Loss to Prioritize Evidence-Based Conservation and Restoration in Bhitarkanika and Mahanadi Delta, India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-20, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:2:p:963-:d:1025583
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/2/963/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/2/963/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Bongaarts, 2019. "IPBES, 2019. Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science‐Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 45(3), pages 680-681, September.
    2. Kanika Bimrah & Rajarshi Dasgupta & Shizuka Hashimoto & Izuru Saizen & Shalini Dhyani, 2022. "Ecosystem Services of Mangroves: A Systematic Review and Synthesis of Contemporary Scientific Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-16, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marie Stenton & Veronika Kapsali & Richard S. Blackburn & Joseph A. Houghton, 2021. "From Clothing Rations to Fast Fashion: Utilising Regenerated Protein Fibres to Alleviate Pressures on Mass Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Alessio Ilari & Sara Fabrizi & Ester Foppa Pedretti, 2022. "European Hophornbeam Biomass for Energy Application: Influence of Different Production Processes and Heating Devices on Environmental Sustainability," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-15, January.
    3. Sepide Mehrabi & Juan Carlos Perez-Mesa & Cynthia Giagnocavo, 2022. "The Role of Consumer-Citizens and Connectedness to Nature in the Sustainable Transition to Agroecological Food Systems: The Mediation of Innovative Business Models and a Multi-Level Perspective," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-21, January.
    4. Meijing Chen & Zhongke Bai & Qingri Wang & Zeyu Shi, 2021. "Habitat Quality Effect and Driving Mechanism of Land Use Transitions: A Case Study of Henan Water Source Area of the Middle Route of the South-to-North Water Transfer Project," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-20, July.
    5. Portia Adade Williams & Likho Sikutshwa & Sheona Shackleton, 2020. "Acknowledging Indigenous and Local Knowledge to Facilitate Collaboration in Landscape Approaches—Lessons from a Systematic Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-17, September.
    6. Irene Chrysafis & Georgios Korakis & Apostolos P. Kyriazopoulos & Giorgos Mallinis, 2020. "Predicting Tree Species Diversity Using Geodiversity and Sentinel-2 Multi-Seasonal Spectral Information," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-14, November.
    7. Lea Barbett & Edward J. N. Stupple & Michael Sweet & Malcolm B. Schofield & Miles Richardson, 2020. "Measuring Actions for Nature—Development and Validation of a Pro-Nature Conservation Behaviour Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-20, June.
    8. Daniel Amoak & Isaac Luginaah & Gordon McBean, 2022. "Climate Change, Food Security, and Health: Harnessing Agroecology to Build Climate-Resilient Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-15, October.
    9. Fangjie Pan & Nannan Shu & Qing Wan & Qi Huang, 2023. "Land Use Function Transition and Associated Ecosystem Service Value Effects Based on Production–Living–Ecological Space: A Case Study in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-19, January.
    10. Ludovica Dessì & Lina Podda & Giuseppe Brundu & Vanessa Lozano & Antoine Carrouée & Elizabete Marchante & Hélia Marchante & Yohan Petit & Marco Porceddu & Gianluigi Bacchetta, 2021. "Seed Germination Ecophysiology of Acacia dealbata Link and Acacia mearnsii De Wild.: Two Invasive Species in the Mediterranean Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-15, October.
    11. Chenchen Ding & Yong Xia & Yang Su & Feng Li & Changjiang Xiong & Jingwen Xu, 2022. "Study on the Impact of Climate Change on China’s Import Trade of Major Agricultural Products and Adaptation Strategies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-21, November.
    12. Wang, Jinsong & Gao, Dongdong & Shi, Wei & Du, Jiayan & Huang, Zhuo & Liu, Buyuan, 2023. "Spatio-temporal changes in ecosystem service value: Evidence from the economic development of urbanised regions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    13. Tuyen Thi Tran & Kazuya Takahashi & Hiroaki Nishikawa & Viet Ha Thi Nguyen & Thuy Thi Hoang & Thuy Ha Thi Nguyen & Tai Khac Dau & Vinh Thi Vo & Du Dinh Tran, 2023. "Evaluation of Mangrove Ecosystem Importance for Local Livelihoods in Different Landscapes: A Case Study of the Hau and Hoang Mai River Estuaries in Nghe An, North-Central Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-12, February.
    14. Yi Huang & Li Peng & Yongchang Li, 2022. "Landscape Ecological Concepts in Planning (LEP): Progress, Hotspots, and Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-25, December.
    15. Bengochea Paz, Diego & Henderson, Kirsten & Loreau, Michel, 2020. "Agricultural land use and the sustainability of social-ecological systems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 437(C).
    16. Heyang Gong & Zhibo Zhao & Lei Chang & Guanghui Li & Ying Li & Yuefen Li, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Patterns in and Key Influences on Cultivated-Land Multi-Functionality in Northeast China’s Black-Soil Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-18, July.
    17. Donny Juliandri Prihadi & Guanghai Zhang & Ghulam M. Lahbar & Buntora Pasaribu, 2024. "Integration of Community-Based Tourism (CBT) Index and Biophysical Assessment for Sustainable Ecotourism Mangrove: A Case Study of Karangsong, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-16, March.
    18. Mengxue Liu & Hejie Wei & Xiaobin Dong & Xue-Chao Wang & Bingyu Zhao & Ying Zhang, 2022. "Integrating Land Use, Ecosystem Service, and Human Well-Being: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-31, June.
    19. Deb Burman, Pramit Kumar & A․G․, Prajeesh & Chakraborty, Supriyo & Tiwari, Yogesh K. & Sarma, Dipankar & Gogoi, Nirmali, 2024. "Simulating the ecosystem-atmosphere carbon, water and energy fluxes at a subtropical Indian forest using an ecosystem model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 490(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:2:p:963-:d:1025583. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.