IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i18p5654-d631664.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Clothing Rations to Fast Fashion: Utilising Regenerated Protein Fibres to Alleviate Pressures on Mass Production

Author

Listed:
  • Marie Stenton

    (London College of Fashion, University of the Arts London, London SW1P 4JU, UK)

  • Veronika Kapsali

    (London College of Fashion, University of the Arts London, London SW1P 4JU, UK)

  • Richard S. Blackburn

    (School of Design, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK)

  • Joseph A. Houghton

    (School of Design, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK)

Abstract

Sustainable methods of practice within the fashion and textile industry (FTI) often strive to employ a circular economy that aims to eliminate waste through the continual use of resources. Complex problems such as waste, consumption, and overproduction are heavily intertwined; the main aim of this paper is to report on research focused on re-examining the potential of food waste streams as a commercially viable and circular source of raw materials for the FTI. Herein, regenerated protein fibres (RPFs) from food production waste streams rich in protein have been chosen as the main topic of focus. RPFs have a rich and relevant history from a local manufacturing perspective during wartime and post-war clothing rationing (1941–1949) in the UK. RPFs were used to meet civilian needs for wool-based textiles as part of a wider series of ‘make do and mend’ strategies designed to manage the consumption of new textile products. However, RPFs demonstrated inferior quality in terms of durability when compared to wool-based textiles, a significant contributing factor to the consequent commercial phasing out of RPFs. In today’s take–make–waste model, the FTI landscape can be defined by speed, from slow (high-quality materials and construction, long-lasting products) to fast (seasonal, disposable, low-quality materials and construction), the latter infamous for dire environmental impacts. A key objective of this research is to review the association of quality and longevity within the context of a local and circular fashion economy in which textile quality and lifecycle analysis are holistically matched to the longevity of the textile, garment, or product to reduce waste across the supply chain.

Suggested Citation

  • Marie Stenton & Veronika Kapsali & Richard S. Blackburn & Joseph A. Houghton, 2021. "From Clothing Rations to Fast Fashion: Utilising Regenerated Protein Fibres to Alleviate Pressures on Mass Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-18, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:18:p:5654-:d:631664
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/18/5654/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/18/5654/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. World Commission on Environment and Development,, 1987. "Our Common Future," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780192820808.
    2. Marie Stenton & Joseph A. Houghton & Veronika Kapsali & Richard S. Blackburn, 2021. "The Potential for Regenerated Protein Fibres within a Circular Economy: Lessons from the Past Can Inform Sustainable Innovation in the Textiles Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    3. Maria Vincenza Ciasullo & Gennaro Maione & Carlo Torre & Orlando Troisi, 2017. "What about Sustainability? An Empirical Analysis of Consumers’ Purchasing Behavior in Fashion Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-18, September.
    4. Sachs,Jeffrey & Schmidt-Traub,Guido & Kroll,Christian & Lafortune,Guillaume & Fuller,Grayson & Woelm,Finn, 2021. "Sustainable Development Report 2020," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781108994651.
    5. Sachs,Jeffrey & Schmidt-Traub,Guido & Kroll,Christian & Lafortune,Guillaume & Fuller,Grayson & Woelm,Finn, 2021. "Sustainable Development Report 2020," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781108834209.
    6. Namhee Yoon & Ha Kyung Lee & Ho Jung Choo, 2020. "Fast Fashion Avoidance Beliefs and Anti-Consumption Behaviors: The Cases of Korea and Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-20, August.
    7. Bo Zhang & Yaozhong Zhang & Peng Zhou, 2021. "Consumer Attitude towards Sustainability of Fast Fashion Products in the UK," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-23, February.
    8. John Bongaarts, 2019. "IPBES, 2019. Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science‐Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 45(3), pages 680-681, September.
    9. Benjamin T. Hazen & Diane A. Mollenkopf & Yacan Wang, 2017. "Remanufacturing for the Circular Economy: An Examination of Consumer Switching Behavior," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(4), pages 451-464, May.
    10. Sachs,Jeffrey & Kroll,Christian & Lafortune,Guillame & Fuller,Grayson & Woelm,Finn, 2021. "Sustainable Development Report 2021," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781009098915.
    11. Ciornea Raluca, 2020. "Is the Transition to Bioeconomy a Sustainable Solution in Fast-fashion Industry, Considering the Overconsumption? - Premises for Future Research," Marketing – from Information to Decision Journal, Sciendo, vol. 3(1), pages 27-44, June.
    12. Patricia van Loon & Charles Delagarde & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2018. "The role of second-hand markets in circular business: a simple model for leasing versus selling consumer products," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(1-2), pages 960-973, January.
    13. Sachs,Jeffrey & Kroll,Christian & Lafortune,Guillame & Fuller,Grayson & Woelm,Finn, 2021. "Sustainable Development Report 2021," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781009102896, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Osmud Rahman & Dingtao Hu & Benjamin C. M. Fung, 2023. "A Systematic Literature Review of Fashion, Sustainability, and Consumption Using a Mixed Methods Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-37, August.
    2. Hannah Auerbach George & Marie Stenton & Veronika Kapsali & Richard S. Blackburn & Joseph A. Houghton, 2022. "Referencing Historical Practices and Emergent Technologies in the Future Development of Sustainable Textiles: A Case Study Exploring “Ardil”, a UK-Based Regenerated Protein Fibre," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-21, July.
    3. Maciej Dzikuć & Arkadiusz Piwowar, 2022. "Economic Aspects of Low Carbon Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-3, July.
    4. Michelle Burton & Rachel Eike, 2023. "The Sustainability-Conscious Consumer: An Exploration of the Motivations, Values, Beliefs, and Norms Guiding Garment Life Extension Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-16, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carmen García-Peña & Moneyba González-Medina & Jose Manuel Diaz-Sarachaga, 2021. "Assessment of the Governance Dimension in the Frame of the 2030 Agenda: Evidence from 100 Spanish Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-21, May.
    2. Miguel Leiva-Brondo & Natalia Lajara-Camilleri & Anna Vidal-Meló & Alejandro Atarés & Cristina Lull, 2022. "Spanish University Students’ Awareness and Perception of Sustainable Development Goals and Sustainability Literacy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-26, April.
    3. George H. Ionescu & Elena Jianu & Ioana C. Patrichi & Florin Ghiocel & Lili Țenea & Delia Iancu, 2021. "Assessment of Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) Implementation in Bulgaria and Future Developments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-33, October.
    4. Antonia Asenjo & Verónica Escudero & Hannah Liepmann, 2024. "Why Should we Integrate Income and Employment Support? A Conceptual and Empirical Investigation," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(1), pages 1-29, January.
    5. Qiezeng Yuan, 2021. "How to Restrain Regulatory Capture and Promote Green Innovation in China. An Analysis Based on Evolutionary Game Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-20, August.
    6. Łukasz Sułkowski & Katarzyna Kolasińska-Morawska & Robert Seliga & Piotr Buła & Paweł Morawski, 2021. "Sustainability Culture of Polish Universities in Professionalization of Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-22, December.
    7. Mohammed Al-Surf & Ashraf Balabel & Mamdooh Alwetaishi & Ahmed Abdelhafiz & Usama Issa & Ibrahim Sharaky & Amal Shamseldin & Mosleh Al-Harthi, 2021. "Stakeholder’s Perspective on Green Building Rating Systems in Saudi Arabia: The Case of LEED, Mostadam, and the SDGs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-25, July.
    8. Mauro D’Apuzzo & Azzurra Evangelisti & Rose Line Spacagna & Giuseppe Cappelli & Vittorio Nicolosi & Giuseppe Modoni & Luca Paolella, 2022. "Seismic Resilience Assessment Strategy for Social and Sustainability Impact Evaluation on Transportation Road Network: A Seismic Liquefaction-Induced Damage Application," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-17, July.
    9. Weng Hoe Lam & Weng Siew Lam & Kah Fai Liew & Pei Fun Lee, 2023. "Decision Analysis on the Financial Performance of Companies Using Integrated Entropy-Fuzzy TOPSIS Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, January.
    10. Stasys Mizaras & Diana Lukmine, 2021. "Forest and Society’s Welfare: Impact Assessment in Lithuania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-14, May.
    11. Edith Medina-Hernández & María José Fernández-Gómez & Inmaculada Barrera-Mellado, 2021. "Gender Inequality in Latin America: A Multidimensional Analysis Based on ECLAC Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-20, November.
    12. Raghu Raman & Nava Subramaniam & Vinith Kumar Nair & Avinash Shivdas & Krishnashree Achuthan & Prema Nedungadi, 2022. "Women Entrepreneurship and Sustainable Development: Bibliometric Analysis and Emerging Research Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-31, July.
    13. Miji Kwon & Eun-Mi Jang & Wonyoung Yang, 2022. "Mask-Wearing Perception of Preschool Children in Korea during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-13, September.
    14. Yok-Yong Lee & Kim-Leng Goh, 2023. "The Happiness-Economic Well-Being Nexus: New Insights From Global Panel Data," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, October.
    15. Alexandra-Maria Danilet, 2022. "Digital Technologies: Key Vector In Achieving Sustainable Development Goals," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 2, pages 58-63, April.
    16. Di Ye & Yufei Zhang & Qilun Li & Xue Zhang & Chunli Chu & Meiting Ju, 2022. "Assessing the Spatiotemporal Development of Ecological Civilization for China’s Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-20, July.
    17. Dongbing Li & Yao Chang & Zibibula Simayi & Shengtian Yang, 2022. "Multi-Scenario Dynamic Simulation of Urban Agglomeration Development on the Northern Slope of the Tianshan Mountains in Xinjiang, China, with the Goal of High-Quality Urban Construction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-19, June.
    18. Agne Brandisauskiene & Loreta Buksnyte-Marmiene & Jurate Cesnaviciene & Ausra Daugirdiene & Egle Kemeryte-Ivanauskiene & Rasa Nedzinskaite-Maciuniene, 2021. "Connection between Teacher Support and Student’s Achievement: Could Growth Mindset Be the Moderator?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-14, December.
    19. Miji Kwon & Wonyoung Yang, 2022. "Mask-Wearing Behaviors after Two Years of Wearing Masks Due to COVID-19 in Korea: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-18, November.
    20. Antonio Somoza, 2023. "Voluntary sustainability assurance in small and medium‐sized entities: The role of country origin in Europe," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 462-483, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:18:p:5654-:d:631664. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.