IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i2p1549-d1034626.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainability Innovation in the Textile Industry: A Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Budi Harsanto

    (Department of Management and Business, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung 40132, Indonesia)

  • Ina Primiana

    (Department of Management and Business, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung 40132, Indonesia)

  • Vita Sarasi

    (Department of Management and Business, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung 40132, Indonesia)

  • Yayan Satyakti

    (Department of Economics, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung 40132, Indonesia)

Abstract

The aim of this review study is to understand the current state and practice of sustainability innovation in the textile industry. The textile industry is regarded as one of the industries that faces the biggest challenges in incorporating sustainability in its business practices. In this study, we conducted a systematic review to synthesize empirical knowledge relevant to sustainable innovation in the textile industry. From the systematic search process, 41 papers that were identified met the criteria of inclusion and were then analyzed qualitatively using thematic analysis. The findings showed that the attention of researchers toward sustainability innovation has increased in the recent years. Sustainability innovation practices in the textile industry were identified. Sustainability product innovation includes ecodesign, ecolabel, life cycle assessment, materials, and packaging. Sustainability process innovation includes cleaner production, ecoefficiency, waste handling, supply chain management, and enzymatic textile processing in process innovation. Sustainability organizational innovation includes the environmental management system (EMS) and corporate policy, collaboration, business model innovation, culture and knowledge management, and enzymatic textile processing. This study found that the dominant sustainability innovation practice discussed in the textile industry is more related to the ecological innovation aspect compared to social innovation. As consumer demand for ecofriendly products is growing, as are more stringent regulations, it is important for business players and policymakers to develop sustainability innovation in the textile industry together.

Suggested Citation

  • Budi Harsanto & Ina Primiana & Vita Sarasi & Yayan Satyakti, 2023. "Sustainability Innovation in the Textile Industry: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-21, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:2:p:1549-:d:1034626
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/2/1549/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/2/1549/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nancy J. Hodges & Albert N. Link, 2019. "Innovation by design," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 395-403, February.
    2. Ziegler, Andreas & Seijas Nogareda, Jazmin, 2009. "Environmental management systems and technological environmental innovations: Exploring the causal relationship," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 885-893, June.
    3. Anupriya Desore & Sapna A. Narula, 2018. "An overview on corporate response towards sustainability issues in textile industry," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 1439-1459, August.
    4. Rahman, Mahfuzur & Billah, Md Morsaline & Hack-Polay, Dieu & Alam, Ashraful, 2020. "The use of biotechnologies in textile processing and environmental sustainability: An emerging market context," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    5. Loo, Becky P. Y., 2002. "The Textile and Clothing Industries Under the Fifth Kondratieff Wave: Some Insights from the Case of Hong Kong," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 847-872, May.
    6. Hien Thi Thanh Ho & Tsunemi Watanabe, 2020. "The dynamics of textile firm responses to the restriction of endocrine disrupting surfactants: a Vietnam case study," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(4), pages 504-521, April.
    7. Hanna H. Salo & Johanna Suikkanen & Ari Nissinen, 2020. "Eco‐innovation motivations and ecodesign tool implementation in companies in the Nordic textile and information technology sectors," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2654-2667, September.
    8. Budi Harsanto & Asep Mulyana & Yudi Ahmad Faisal & Venny Mellandhia Shandy & Muntasir Alam, 2022. "A Systematic Review on Sustainability-Oriented Innovation in the Social Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-18, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sofia Plakantonaki & Kyriaki Kiskira & Nikolaos Zacharopoulos & Ioannis Chronis & Fernando Coelho & Amir Togiani & Konstantinos Kalkanis & Georgios Priniotakis, 2023. "A Review of Sustainability Standards and Ecolabeling in the Textile Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Kurniawati, 2023. "Sustainable Textile Practices by Integrated Viscose Rayon and Yarn Producers: An Empirical Study," GATR Journals jfbr210, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    3. Congbin Cheng & Sayed Fayaz Ahmad & Muhammad Irshad & Ghadeer Alsanie & Yasser Khan & Ahmad Y. A. Bani Ahmad (Ayassrah) & Abdu Rahman Aleemi, 2023. "Impact of Green Process Innovation and Productivity on Sustainability: The Moderating Role of Environmental Awareness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-19, August.
    4. Simina Teodora Hora & Constantin Bungau & Paul Andrei Negru & Andrei-Flavius Radu, 2023. "Implementing Circular Economy Elements in the Textile Industry: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-24, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aschhoff, Birgit & Baier, Elisabeth & Crass, Dirk & Hud, Martin & Hünermund, Paul & Köhler, Christian & Peters, Bettina & Rammer, Christian & Schricke, Esther & Schubert, Torben & Schwiebacher, Franz, 2013. "Innovation in Germany - Results of the German CIS 2006 to 2010. Background report on the Innovation Surveys 2007, 2009 and 2011 of the Mannheim Innovation Panel," ZEW Dokumentationen 13-01, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    2. Szalavetz, Andrea, 2002. "Az informatikai szektor és a felzárkózó gazdaságok [The informatics sector and the advancing economies]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(9), pages 794-804.
    3. Durán-Romero, Gemma & López, Ana M. & Beliaeva, Tatiana & Ferasso, Marcos & Garonne, Christophe & Jones, Paul, 2020. "Bridging the gap between circular economy and climate change mitigation policies through eco-innovations and Quintuple Helix Model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    4. Joana Costa, 2021. "Carrots or Sticks: Which Policies Matter the Most in Sustainable Resource Management?," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-21, February.
    5. Giulio Cainelli & Massimiliano Mazzanti & Sandro Montresor, 2012. "Environmental Innovations, Local Networks and Internationalization," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(8), pages 697-734, November.
    6. Patricia Laurens & Christian Le Bas & Stéphane Lhuillery & Antoine Schoen, 2017. "The determinants of cleaner energy innovations of the world’s largest firms: the impact of firm learning and knowledge capital," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(4), pages 311-333, May.
    7. Rizwan Raheem Ahmed & Grigorios L. Kyriakopoulos & Dalia Streimikiene & Justas Streimikis, 2021. "Drivers of Proactive Environmental Strategies: Evidence from the Pharmaceutical Industry of Asian Economies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-28, August.
    8. Becky Loo, 2007. "The role of paratransit: some reflections based on the experience of residents’ coach services in Hong Kong," Transportation, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 471-486, July.
    9. Nicolò Barbieri & Claudia Ghisetti & Marianna Gilli & Giovanni Marin & Francesco Nicolli, 2016. "A Survey Of The Literature On Environmental Innovation Based On Main Path Analysis," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 596-623, July.
    10. Ren, Shenggang & Cheng, Yingmei & Hu, Yucai & Yin, Chao, 2021. "Feeling right at home: Hometown CEOs and firm innovation," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    11. Juliane Peters & Ana Simaens, 2020. "Integrating Sustainability into Corporate Strategy: A Case Study of the Textile and Clothing Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-35, July.
    12. Denias Kagande & David Madzikanda & Maxwell Sandada & Faustino Taderera, 2022. "Barriers to Effective Supply Chain Management Implementation in the Zimbabwean Public Sector: A Case Study of Public Procuring Entities in Harare, Zimbabwe," Eurasian Journal of Business and Management, Eurasian Publications, vol. 10(2), pages 76-100.
    13. Gregorio Martín‐de Castro & Javier Amores‐Salvadó & José E. Navas‐López, 2016. "Environmental Management Systems and Firm Performance: Improving Firm Environmental Policy through Stakeholder Engagement," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(4), pages 243-256, July.
    14. Maria Giuffrida & Riccardo Mangiaracina, 2020. "Green Practices for Global Supply Chains in Diverse Industrial, Geographical, and Technological Settings: A Literature Review and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-18, December.
    15. Christian Le Bas & Nicolas Poussing, 2013. "Firm voluntary measures for environmental changes, eco-innovations and CSR : Empirical analysis based on data surveys," Working Papers 1322, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St-Étienne (GATE Lyon St-Étienne), Université de Lyon.
    16. Seyedesmaeil Mousavi & Bart Bossink & Mario van Vliet, 2019. "Microfoundations of companies' dynamic capabilities for environmentally sustainable innovation: Case study insights from high‐tech innovation in science‐based companies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 366-387, February.
    17. Ipek Kazancoglu & Yigit Kazancoglu & Emel Yarimoglu & Aysun Kahraman, 2020. "A conceptual framework for barriers of circular supply chains for sustainability in the textile industry," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(5), pages 1477-1492, September.
    18. Tariq, Adeel & Badir, Yuosre F. & Tariq, Waqas & Bhutta, Umair Saeed, 2017. "Drivers and consequences of green product and process innovation: A systematic review, conceptual framework, and future outlook," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 8-23.
    19. Marc Jourdaine & Philippe Loubet & Guido Sonnemann & Stéphane Trébucq, 2021. "The ABC‐LCA method for the integration of activity‐based costing and life cycle assessment," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 1735-1750, May.
    20. Diego A. Vazquez-Brust & José A. Plaza-Úbeda, 2021. "Green Growth Policy, De-Growth, and Sustainability: The Alternative Solution for Achieving the Balance between Both the Natural and the Economic System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-10, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:2:p:1549-:d:1034626. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.