IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i2p1298-d1031018.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Transport to Quantify the Impact of Vertical Integration on the Construction Supply Chain: A New Zealand Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Kamal Dhawan

    (Department of Built Environment Engineering, School of Future Environments, Faculty of Design and Creative Technologies, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland 1010, New Zealand)

  • John E. Tookey

    (Department of Built Environment Engineering, School of Future Environments, Faculty of Design and Creative Technologies, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland 1010, New Zealand)

  • Ali GhaffarianHoseini

    (Department of Built Environment Engineering, School of Future Environments, Faculty of Design and Creative Technologies, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland 1010, New Zealand)

  • Mani Poshdar

    (Department of Built Environment Engineering, School of Future Environments, Faculty of Design and Creative Technologies, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland 1010, New Zealand)

Abstract

New Zealand (NZ) construction is highly fragmented, comprises primarily micro small and medium enterprises (MSMEs); 32.5% of approximately 67,000 operating businesses are ‘small’ (up to 19 employees), while 65% are sole traders. The construction supply chain (CSC) is extensive, prone to inefficiencies at segmental boundaries accentuated by project-centric delivery. Conversely, it presents significant opportunity for consolidation and improved efficiency. Vertical integration and CSC management from the supplier-end rather than the project-end enable component elements to be individually independent in terms of ownership, while integrating their management above the tactical CSC level. This leads to improved operational philosophy and employment. Quantifying impacts, however, is a challenge due to lack of tangibility. This can be effectively overcome using quantifiable parameters associated with the CSC’s transport component. The paper investigates transport operations in a narrow NZ CSC segment over a three-month period to quantify improved performance using operational data and further potential for resource optimisation using operations research-based planning. Research outcomes point towards: (i) Fleet management strategy; (ii) Integrated planning and operational delivery; (iii) Non-price attributes in tendering/contracting; (iv) Change in the delivery model of manufactured construction products; (v) Information and communication technology-based solutions; and (vi) Integration of reverse logistics.

Suggested Citation

  • Kamal Dhawan & John E. Tookey & Ali GhaffarianHoseini & Mani Poshdar, 2023. "Using Transport to Quantify the Impact of Vertical Integration on the Construction Supply Chain: A New Zealand Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-26, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:2:p:1298-:d:1031018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/2/1298/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/2/1298/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ioannis Chatziioannou & Luis Alvarez-Icaza & Efthimios Bakogiannis & Charalampos Kyriakidis & Luis Chias-Becerril, 2020. "A Structural Analysis for the Categorization of the Negative Externalities of Transport and the Hierarchical Organization of Sustainable Mobility’s Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-27, July.
    2. Kesidou, Sofia & Sovacool, Benjamin K., 2019. "Supply chain integration for low-carbon buildings: A critical interdisciplinary review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Cindy Guerlain & Samuel Renault & Francesco Ferrero, 2019. "Understanding Construction Logistics in Urban Areas and Lowering Its Environmental Impact: A Focus on Construction Consolidation Centres," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-11, November.
    4. Andreas Ekeskär & Martin Rudberg, 2016. "Third-party logistics in construction: the case of a large hospital project," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(3), pages 174-191, March.
    5. Majid Khan & James Lockhart, 2019. "Embedding Corporate Social Responsibility into Business Practice: Lessons Learned from New Zealand," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, in: Gabriel Eweje & Ralph J. Bathurst (ed.), Clean, Green and Responsible?, chapter 0, pages 87-105, Springer.
    6. Andrew Agapiou & Roger Flanagan & George Norman & David Notman, 1998. "The changing role of builders merchants in the construction supply chain," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(3), pages 351-361.
    7. Mihai Felea & Irina Albăstroiu, 2013. "Defining the Concept of Supply Chain Management and its Relevance to Romanian Academics and Practitioners," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(33), pages 74-88, February.
    8. Vacar Anca, 2019. "Logistics And Supply Chain Management: An Overview," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 14(2), pages 209-215, August.
    9. Anna Dubois & Lars-Erik Gadde, 2002. "The construction industry as a loosely coupled system: implications for productivity and innovation," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(7), pages 621-631.
    10. Wegelius-Lehtonen, Tutu, 2001. "Performance measurement in construction logistics," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 107-116, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahmet Anil Sezer & Anna Fredriksson, 2021. "Paving the Path towards Efficient Construction Logistics by Revealing the Current Practice and Issues," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-15, August.
    2. Anna Fredriksson & Linnea Eriksson & Jonas Löwgren & Nina Lemon & Daniel Eriksson, 2022. "An Interactive Visualization Tool for Collaborative Construction Logistics Planning—Creating a Sustainable Project Vicinity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Kamal Dhawan & John E. Tookey & Ali GhaffarianHoseini & Mani Poshdar, 2024. "Monetised sustainability impacts of integrated planning in the manufactured construction products industry: A transport perspective from New Zealand," Journal of Economic Analysis, Anser Press, vol. 3(4), pages 161-185, December.
    4. Luis Felipe Cândido & Jose Carlos Lazaro & Adriano Olivier de Freitas e Silva & José de Paula Barros Neto, 2023. "Sustainability Transitions in the Construction Sector: A Bibliometric Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-26, August.
    5. Jonathan Gosling & Mohamed Naim & Denis Towill & Wessam Abouarghoub & Brian Moone, 2015. "Supplier development initiatives and their impact on the consistency of project performance," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(5-6), pages 390-403, June.
    6. Farah Naz & Anna Fredriksson & Linea Kjellsdotter Ivert, 2022. "The Potential of Improving Construction Transport Time Efficiency—A Freight Forwarder Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-19, August.
    7. Qingbin Cui & Makarand Hastak & Daniel Halpin, 2010. "Systems analysis of project cash flow management strategies," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 361-376.
    8. Ioannis Chatziioannou & Efthimios Bakogiannis & Charalampos Kyriakidis & Luis Alvarez-Icaza, 2020. "A Prospective Study for the Mitigation of the Climate Change Effects: The Case of the North Aegean Region of Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-20, December.
    9. Beerepoot, Milou & Beerepoot, Niels, 2007. "Government regulation as an impetus for innovation: Evidence from energy performance regulation in the Dutch residential building sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(10), pages 4812-4825, October.
    10. Goknur Arzu Akyuz & Guner Gursoy, 2020. "Strategic management perspectives on supply chain," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 70(2), pages 213-241, May.
    11. Per Erik Eriksson & Ossi Pesamaa, 2007. "Modelling procurement effects on cooperation," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(8), pages 893-901.
    12. Ana Bricia Galindo-Muro & Riccardo Cespi & Stephany Isabel Vallarta-Serrano, 2023. "Applications of Electric Vehicles in Instant Deliveries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-18, February.
    13. Wei Daojiang & Li Huimin, 2014. "An Empirical Study on the Influencing Factors of Knowledge Sharing in Project Context," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 2(2), pages 154-169, April.
    14. Andrej David & Peter Mako & Jan Lizbetin & Patrik Bohm, 2021. "The Impact of an Environmental Way of Customer’s Thinking on a Range of Choice from Transport Routes in Maritime Transport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-23, January.
    15. Kesidou, Sofia & Sovacool, Benjamin K., 2019. "Supply chain integration for low-carbon buildings: A critical interdisciplinary review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    16. Euchi, Jalel & Kallel, Ahmed, 2021. "Internalization of external congestion and CO2emissions costs related to road transport: The case of Tunisia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    17. Cristinel Vasiliu & Mihai Ovidiu Cercel, 2015. "Innovation in retail: impact on creating a positive experience when buying fashion products," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 17(39), pages 583-583, May.
    18. Khan, Majid & Lockhart, James & Bathurst, Ralph, 2021. "The institutional analysis of CSR: Learnings from an emerging country," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    19. Magdalena Mucowska, 2021. "Trends of Environmentally Sustainable Solutions of Urban Last-Mile Deliveries on the E-Commerce Market—A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-26, May.
    20. Nicolas Brusselaers & Selamawit Mamo Fufa & Koen Mommens, 2022. "A Sustainability Assessment Framework for On-Site and Off-Site Construction Logistics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-14, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:2:p:1298-:d:1031018. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.