IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i24p17032-d1008096.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Interactive Visualization Tool for Collaborative Construction Logistics Planning—Creating a Sustainable Project Vicinity

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Fredriksson

    (Department of Science and Technology, Linköping University, Campus Norrköping, 60174 Norrköping, Sweden)

  • Linnea Eriksson

    (The Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute (VTI), MAP Unit, 58330 Linköping, Sweden)

  • Jonas Löwgren

    (Department of Science and Technology, Linköping University, Campus Norrköping, 60174 Norrköping, Sweden)

  • Nina Lemon

    (Division Digital System, RISE Research Institutes of Sweden AB, 43153 Mölndal, Sweden)

  • Daniel Eriksson

    (Division Digital System, RISE Research Institutes of Sweden AB, 43153 Mölndal, Sweden)

Abstract

The intensity of urban development is presently high, creating a construction boom. The number of transports per project is a major consideration in urban goods transport and emissions from a project. Presently, the stakeholders take part in a “blame game” in assigning fault for the emissions from construction transport and the disturbances to society in the vicinity of construction sites. Incorporation of logistics into urban planning requires an increased understanding of the interaction between construction transport flows and urban land use, and the inclusion of different stakeholders. The purpose of the study is to support collaborative planning of construction transport in urban planning, and specifically to explore how a planning tool based on interactive visualization could be designed. An action research process has generated two prototypes of an interactive visualization tool for collaborative planning of construction transport. The prototype facilitates a “shared deliberation space” by identifying alternatives and assessing predicted consequences, which supports a collaborative urban planning process. Based on the research conducted, we claim that the responsibility of construction transport planning should be taken by the municipality, i.e., the urban planning and traffic planning functions.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Fredriksson & Linnea Eriksson & Jonas Löwgren & Nina Lemon & Daniel Eriksson, 2022. "An Interactive Visualization Tool for Collaborative Construction Logistics Planning—Creating a Sustainable Project Vicinity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-14, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:24:p:17032-:d:1008096
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/24/17032/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/24/17032/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ballantyne, Erica E.F. & Lindholm, Maria & Whiteing, Anthony, 2013. "A comparative study of urban freight transport planning: addressing stakeholder needs," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 93-101.
    2. Li, L. & Bao, Helen X.H. & Robinson, Guy M., 2020. "The return of state control and its impact on land market efficiency in urban China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    3. Paul Timms, 2008. "Transport models, philosophy and language," Transportation, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 395-410, May.
    4. Sönke Behrends & Maria Lindholm & Johan Woxenius, 2008. "The Impact of Urban Freight Transport: A Definition of Sustainability from an Actor's Perspective," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(6), pages 693-713, September.
    5. Cindy Guerlain & Samuel Renault & Francesco Ferrero, 2019. "Understanding Construction Logistics in Urban Areas and Lowering Its Environmental Impact: A Focus on Construction Consolidation Centres," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-11, November.
    6. Wanjie Hu & Jianjun Dong & Bon-gang Hwang & Rui Ren & Zhilong Chen, 2019. "A Scientometrics Review on City Logistics Literature: Research Trends, Advanced Theory and Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-27, May.
    7. Parisa Dolati Neghabadi & Karine Evrard Samuel & Marie-Laure Espinouse, 2019. "Systematic literature review on city logistics: overview, classification and analysis," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(3), pages 865-887, February.
    8. Andreas Ekeskär & Martin Rudberg, 2016. "Third-party logistics in construction: the case of a large hospital project," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(3), pages 174-191, March.
    9. Viktoria Sundquist & Lars-Erik Gadde & Kajsa Hulthén, 2018. "Reorganizing construction logistics for improved performance," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1), pages 49-65, January.
    10. Marco Adelfio & Iqbal Hamiduddin & Elke Miedema, 2021. "London’s King’s Cross redevelopment: a compact, resource efficient and ‘liveable’ global city model for an era of climate emergency?," Urban Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 180-200, March.
    11. Farah Naz & Anna Fredriksson & Linea Kjellsdotter Ivert, 2022. "The Potential of Improving Construction Transport Time Efficiency—A Freight Forwarder Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-19, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sergio Maria Patella & Gianluca Grazieschi & Valerio Gatta & Edoardo Marcucci & Stefano Carrese, 2020. "The Adoption of Green Vehicles in Last Mile Logistics: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-29, December.
    2. Ahmet Anil Sezer & Anna Fredriksson, 2021. "Paving the Path towards Efficient Construction Logistics by Revealing the Current Practice and Issues," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-15, August.
    3. Magdalena Mucowska, 2021. "Trends of Environmentally Sustainable Solutions of Urban Last-Mile Deliveries on the E-Commerce Market—A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-26, May.
    4. Gleb V. Savin, 2021. "The smart city transport and logistics system: Theory, methodology and practice," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 12(6), pages 67-86, October.
    5. Serban Raicu & Dorinela Costescu & Stefan Burciu, 2020. "Distribution System with Flow Consolidation at the Boundary of Urban Congested Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-17, January.
    6. Snežana Tadić & Mladen Krstić & Milovan Kovač, 2023. "Assessment of city logistics initiative categories sustainability: case of Belgrade," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 1383-1419, February.
    7. Kamal Dhawan & John E. Tookey & Ali GhaffarianHoseini & Mani Poshdar, 2023. "Using Transport to Quantify the Impact of Vertical Integration on the Construction Supply Chain: A New Zealand Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-26, January.
    8. Mikael Kervall & Henrik Pålsson, 2022. "A Multi-Stakeholder Perspective on Barriers to a Fossil-Free Urban Freight System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, December.
    9. HÃ¥vard Haarstad & Rafael Rosales & Subina Shrestha, 2024. "Freight logistics and the city," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(1), pages 3-19, January.
    10. Büyüközkan, Gülçin & Ilıcak, Öykü, 2022. "Smart urban logistics: Literature review and future directions," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    11. Farah Naz & Anna Fredriksson & Linea Kjellsdotter Ivert, 2022. "The Potential of Improving Construction Transport Time Efficiency—A Freight Forwarder Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-19, August.
    12. Yi Jiang & Polin Lai & Chia-Hsun Chang & Kum Fai Yuen & Sihang Li & Xinchen Wang, 2021. "Sustainable Management for Fresh Food E-Commerce Logistics Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, March.
    13. Priscila Pereira Suzart Carvalho & Ricardo Araújo Kalid & Jorge Laureano Moya Rodríguez & Sandro Breval Santiago, 2019. "Interactions among stakeholders in the processes of city logistics: a systematic review of the literature," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 120(2), pages 567-607, August.
    14. Katarzyna Dohn & Marzena Kramarz & Edyta Przybylska, 2022. "Interaction with City Logistics Stakeholders as a Factor of the Development of Polish Cities on the Way to Becoming Smart Cities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-24, June.
    15. Abel Kebede Reda & Girma Gebresenbet & Lori Tavasszy & David Ljungberg, 2020. "Identification of the Regional and Economic Contexts of Sustainable Urban Logistics Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-19, October.
    16. Mohammad Zaher Akkad & Tamás Bányai, 2020. "Multi-Objective Approach for Optimization of City Logistics Considering Energy Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-23, September.
    17. Marta Viu-Roig & Eduard J. Alvarez-Palau, 2020. "The Impact of E-Commerce-Related Last-Mile Logistics on Cities: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-19, August.
    18. Vieira, José Geraldo Vidal & Fransoo, Jan C. & Carvalho, Carla Deguirmendjian, 2015. "Freight distribution in megacities: Perspectives of shippers, logistics service providers and carriers," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 46-54.
    19. Chin-Shan Lu & Kuo-Chung Shang & Chi-Chang Lin, 2016. "Examining sustainability performance at ports: port managers’ perspectives on developing sustainable supply chains," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(8), pages 909-927, November.
    20. Peter Schnell & Phillip Haag & Hans Christian Jünger, 2022. "Implementation of Digital Technologies in Construction Companies: Establishing a Holistic Process which Addresses Current Barriers," Businesses, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-18, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:24:p:17032-:d:1008096. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.