IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jotrge/v32y2013icp93-101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparative study of urban freight transport planning: addressing stakeholder needs

Author

Listed:
  • Ballantyne, Erica E.F.
  • Lindholm, Maria
  • Whiteing, Anthony

Abstract

Over the last decade, research in the area of urban freight transport has increased and local authorities are slowly beginning to acknowledge the need to consider freight in their overall transport planning. Most urban freight studies to date consider specific solutions and measures, as opposed to ways in which the local authorities could and should consider this issue in the wider transport planning and decision making process. The aim of this paper is to examine cities that differ in context in order to demonstrate that urban freight transport planning can be improved by involving a wider range of stakeholders. Interview data from Sweden, the UK and the Baltic Sea Region has been analysed to draw out the factors that influence the perceptions of local authorities and freight operators of freight transport issues in urban areas. The findings show that the issues faced by the freight industry are still not fully understood. The paper contradicts earlier research results that suggest differences in the ways that local authorities consider freight transport, and goes some way towards demonstrating that the problems faced by local authorities are not unique to one country or any specific category of urban area, and hence a generic decision-making framework would be of value. A framework is developed to facilitate meaningful interaction between the various urban freight actors and stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Ballantyne, Erica E.F. & Lindholm, Maria & Whiteing, Anthony, 2013. "A comparative study of urban freight transport planning: addressing stakeholder needs," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 93-101.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:32:y:2013:i:c:p:93-101
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.08.013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692313001671
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.08.013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stathopoulos, Amanda & Valeri, Eva & Marcucci, Edoardo, 2012. "Stakeholder reactions to urban freight policy innovation," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 34-45.
    2. Cherrett, Tom & Allen, Julian & McLeod, Fraser & Maynard, Sarah & Hickford, Adrian & Browne, Mike, 2012. "Understanding urban freight activity – key issues for freight planning," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 22-32.
    3. Freeman, R. Edward, 1994. "The Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future Directions1," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(4), pages 409-421, October.
    4. Clarence Woudsma, 2001. "Understanding the Movement of Goods, Not People: Issues, Evidence and Potential," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 38(13), pages 2439-2455, December.
    5. Laetitia Dablanc, 2011. "City Distribution, a Key Element of the Urban Economy: Guidelines for Practitioners," Chapters, in: Cathy Macharis & Sandra Melo (ed.), City Distribution and Urban Freight Transport, chapter 1, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Dablanc, Laetitia, 2007. "Goods transport in large European cities: Difficult to organize, difficult to modernize," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 280-285, March.
    7. Asvin Goel, 2009. "Vehicle Scheduling and Routing with Drivers' Working Hours," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(1), pages 17-26, February.
    8. Quak, H.J. & de Koster, M.B.M., 2006. "Urban Distribution: The Impacts of Different Governmental Time-Window Schemes," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2006-053-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    9. Phillips, Robert & Freeman, R. Edward & Wicks, Andrew C., 2003. "What Stakeholder Theory is Not," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(4), pages 479-502, October.
    10. H.J. (Hans) Quak, 2011. "Urban Freight Transport: The Challenge of Sustainability," Chapters, in: Cathy Macharis & Sandra Melo (ed.), City Distribution and Urban Freight Transport, chapter 2, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jonathan Cowie & Keith Fisken, 2023. "Urban freight policy maturity and sustainable logistics: are they related?," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Maria Lindholm, 2013. "Urban freight transport from a local authority perspective – a literature review," European Transport \ Trasporti Europei, ISTIEE, Institute for the Study of Transport within the European Economic Integration, issue 54, pages 1-3.
    3. McLeod, Sam & Schapper, Jake H.M. & Curtis, Carey & Graham, Giles, 2019. "Conceptualizing freight generation for transport and land use planning: A review and synthesis of the literature," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 24-34.
    4. Akgün, Emine Zehra & Monios, Jason & Rye, Tom & Fonzone, Achille, 2019. "Influences on urban freight transport policy choice by local authorities," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 88-98.
    5. Vieira, José Geraldo Vidal & Fransoo, Jan C. & Carvalho, Carla Deguirmendjian, 2015. "Freight distribution in megacities: Perspectives of shippers, logistics service providers and carriers," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 46-54.
    6. Ruben Burga & Davar Rezania, 2016. "Stakeholder theory in social entrepreneurship: a descriptive case study," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 6(1), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Nicolas Rincon-Garcia & Ben J. Waterson & Tom J. Cherrett, 2018. "Requirements from vehicle routing software: perspectives from literature, developers and the freight industry," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(1), pages 117-138, January.
    8. Yang, Chao & Chen, Mingyang & Yuan, Quan, 2021. "The geography of freight-related accidents in the era of E-commerce: Evidence from the Los Angeles metropolitan area," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    9. Nina Evans & Janet Sawyer, 2010. "CSR and stakeholders of small businesses in regional South Australia," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 6(3), pages 433-451, August.
    10. Nathalia de Castro Zambuzi & Cláudio Barbieri da Cunha & Edgar Blanco & Hugo T.Y. Yoshizaki & Carla D.Rosa Carvalho, 2013. "The Aspects of the Urban Distribution in a Megacity: A Comparison Between São Paulo’s and Boston’s Urban Deliveries," LARES lares_2013_858-1006-1-sm, Latin American Real Estate Society (LARES).
    11. Amaya, Johanna & Arellana, Julian & Delgado-Lindeman, Maira, 2020. "Stakeholders perceptions to sustainable urban freight policies in emerging markets," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 329-348.
    12. Samantha Miles, 2017. "Stakeholder Theory Classification: A Theoretical and Empirical Evaluation of Definitions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 142(3), pages 437-459, May.
    13. Andrew West, 2016. "Applying Metaethical and Normative Claims of Moral Relativism to (Shareholder and Stakeholder) Models of Corporate Governance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(2), pages 199-215, May.
    14. Franck Aggeri & Aurélien Acquier, 2005. "La théorie des stakeholders permet-elle de rendre compte des pratiques d'entreprise en matière de RSE ?," Post-Print halshs-00645708, HAL.
    15. John Hasnas, 2013. "Whither Stakeholder Theory? A Guide for the Perplexed Revisited," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 112(1), pages 47-57, January.
    16. Aljohani, Khalid & Thompson, Russell G., 2021. "Modelling individual preferences of goods receivers for a Receiver-led delivery consolidation service," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 74-94.
    17. Allen Kaufman & Ernie Englander, 2011. "Behavioral Economics, Federalism, and the Triumph of Stakeholder Theory," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 102(3), pages 421-438, September.
    18. Víctor Meseguer-Sánchez & Emilio Abad-Segura & Luis Jesús Belmonte-Ureña & Valentín Molina-Moreno, 2020. "Examining the Research Evolution on the Socio-Economic and Environmental Dimensions on University Social Responsibility," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-30, July.
    19. Osorio-Tejada, Jose Luis & Llera-Sastresa, Eva & Scarpellini, Sabina, 2017. "Liquefied natural gas: Could it be a reliable option for road freight transport in the EU?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 785-795.
    20. Yi Zhang & Guowei Hua & T. C. E. Cheng & Juliang Zhang, 2020. "Cold chain distribution: How to deal with node and arc time windows?," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 291(1), pages 1127-1151, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:32:y:2013:i:c:p:93-101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-transport-geography .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.