IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i23p16503-d1292904.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital Health Interventions for Promoting Healthy Aging: A Systematic Review of Adoption Patterns, Efficacy, and User Experience

Author

Listed:
  • Majed M. Alruwaili

    (Nursing Administration Department, College of Nursing, Jouf University, Sakaka 72388, Saudi Arabia)

  • Mostafa Shaban

    (Community Health Nursing Department, College of Nursing, Jouf University, Sakaka 72388, Saudi Arabia)

  • Osama Mohamed Elsayed Ramadan

    (Maternity and Pediatric Health Nursing Department, College of Nursing, Jouf University, Sakaka 72388, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Background: Global population aging poses challenges for healthcare. Digital health technologies may benefit older adults through enhanced access, monitoring, and self-care. This systematic review evaluates the intersection of digital health interventions and healthy aging, focusing on adoption, efficacy, and user experience. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched for studies on digital health technologies for adults aged 50+ years. Randomized controlled trials, observational studies, surveys, and qualitative studies were included. Outcomes were adoption rates, efficacy, and qualitative feedback. Study quality was assessed using standardized tools. Results: 15 studies were included. Adoption increased during COVID-19, but divisions persist. Barriers like technology challenges and distrust require addressing. Web-based programs and telerehabilitation demonstrated benefits for behaviors and balance. Users had positive attitudes but emphasized patient-centric, ethical design. Most efficacy data were preliminary; more rigorous trials are needed. Discussion: Digital health interventions show promise for supporting healthy aging, but thoughtful implementation strategies tailored to user needs and capacities are essential to realizing benefits equitably. More efficacy research and studies on real-world integration and ethics are warranted. Conclusions: Digital health has significant potential for promoting healthy aging through enhanced access, monitoring, and self-care. However, evidence-based, patient-centered solutions are imperative to maximize adoption, efficacy, and positive user experience for diverse older adult populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Majed M. Alruwaili & Mostafa Shaban & Osama Mohamed Elsayed Ramadan, 2023. "Digital Health Interventions for Promoting Healthy Aging: A Systematic Review of Adoption Patterns, Efficacy, and User Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-17, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:23:p:16503-:d:1292904
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/23/16503/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/23/16503/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jay J. Van Bavel & Katherine Baicker & Paulo S. Boggio & Valerio Capraro & Aleksandra Cichocka & Mina Cikara & Molly J. Crockett & Alia J. Crum & Karen M. Douglas & James N. Druckman & John Drury & Oe, 2020. "Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 4(5), pages 460-471, May.
    2. Beenish Moalla Chaudhry & Dipanwita Dasgupta & Nitesh V. Chawla, 2022. "Successful Aging for Community-Dwelling Older Adults: An Experimental Study with a Tablet App," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-28, October.
    3. Roberta Bevilacqua & Stefano Strano & Mirko Di Rosa & Cinzia Giammarchi & Katerina Katka Cerna & Claudia Mueller & Elvira Maranesi, 2021. "eHealth Literacy: From Theory to Clinical Application for Digital Health Improvement. Results from the ACCESS Training Experience," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-11, November.
    4. Andy Hong & Jessie Welch-Stockton & Ja Young Kim & Sarah L. Canham & Valerie Greer & Michelle Sorweid, 2023. "Age-Friendly Community Interventions for Health and Social Outcomes: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-27, January.
    5. Khin Shoon Lei Thant Zin & Seieun Kim & Hak-Seon Kim & Israel Fisseha Feyissa, 2023. "A Study on Technology Acceptance of Digital Healthcare among Older Korean Adults Using Extended Tam (Extended Technology Acceptance Model)," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-18, February.
    6. Katarina Friberg-Felsted & Michael Caserta, 2023. "Essentials to Improve the Effectiveness of Healthy Aging Programming: Consideration of Social Determinants and Utilization of a Theoretical Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(15), pages 1-10, August.
    7. Valeska Gatica-Rojas & Ricardo Cartes-Velásquez, 2023. "Telerehabilitation in Low-Resource Settings to Improve Postural Balance in Older Adults: A Non-Inferiority Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial Protocol," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(18), pages 1-13, September.
    8. Grady, P.A. & Gough, L.L., 2014. "Self-management: A comprehensive approach to management of chronic conditions," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 104(8), pages 25-31.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wanja Wolff & Corinna S. Martarelli & Julia Schüler & Maik Bieleke, 2020. "High Boredom Proneness and Low Trait Self-Control Impair Adherence to Social Distancing Guidelines during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-10, July.
    2. Rabia Bokhari & Khurram Shahzad, 2022. "Explaining Resistance to the COVID-19 Preventive Measures: A Psychological Reactance Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, April.
    3. Vivek Shastry & D Cale Reeves & Nicholas Willems & Varun Rai, 2022. "Policy and behavioral response to shock events: An agent-based model of the effectiveness and equity of policy design features," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(1), pages 1-21, January.
    4. Chunhao Wei & Han Chen & Yee Ming Lee, 2022. "COVID-19 preventive measures and restaurant customers’ intention to dine out: the role of brand trust and perceived risk," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 16(3), pages 581-600, September.
    5. Yiting Guo & Jason Shachat & Matthew J. Walker & Lijia Wei, 2021. "Viral social media videos can raise pro-social behaviours when an epidemic arises," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 7(2), pages 120-138, December.
    6. Marijn H. C. Meijers & Christin Scholz & Ragnheiður “Heather” Torfadóttir & Anke Wonneberger & Marko Markov, 2022. "Learning from the COVID-19 pandemic to combat climate change: comparing drivers of individual action in global crises," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 12(2), pages 272-282, June.
    7. Tobias Schlager & Ashley V. Whillans, 2022. "People underestimate the probability of contracting the coronavirus from friends," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-11, December.
    8. Zhang, Yao & Li, Xiaoming, 2017. "Uses of information and communication technologies in HIV self-management: A systematic review of global literature," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 75-83.
    9. Mukesh Kumar Swami & Tanu Gupta, 2021. "Psychological impact of fear-based messages in context of COVID 19," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 67(8), pages 1081-1082, December.
    10. Laliotis, Ioannis & Minos, Dimitrios, 2022. "Religion, social interactions, and COVID-19 incidence in Western Germany," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    11. Elke Loots & Josée Leys & Shara Proost & Manuel Morrens & Inge Glazemakers & Tinne Dilles & Bart Van Rompaey, 2022. "Medication Self-Management in Hospitalised Patients with Schizophrenia or Bipolar Disorder: The Perceptions of Patients and Healthcare Providers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-11, April.
    12. Juvalta, Sibylle & Speranza, Camilla & Robin, Dominik & El Maohub, Yassmeen & Krasselt, Julia & Dreesen, Philipp & Dratva, Julia & Suggs, L. Suzanne, 2023. "Young people's media use and adherence to preventive measures in the “infodemic”: Is it masked by political ideology?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
    13. Hubert, Philipp & Abdel Hadi, Sascha & Mojzisch, Andreas & Häusser, Jan Alexander, 2022. "The effects of organizational climate on adherence to guidelines for COVID-19 prevention," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    14. Hamza Umer, 2023. "Stability of pro-sociality and trust amid the Covid-19: panel data from the Netherlands," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 50(1), pages 255-287, February.
    15. Quan-Hoang Vuong & Tam-Tri Le & Viet-Phuong La & Huyen Thanh Thanh Nguyen & Manh-Toan Ho & Quy Khuc & Minh-Hoang Nguyen, 2022. "Covid-19 vaccines production and societal immunization under the serendipity-mindsponge-3D knowledge management theory and conceptual framework," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-12, December.
    16. Pierre Genest & Léo Trespeuch, 2022. "Internet users’ perception about the impact of the pandemic on sports sponsorship [La perception des internautes face à l'impact de la pandémie sur le mécénat sportif]," Working Papers hal-03945701, HAL.
    17. Jesper Akesson & Sam Ashworth-Hayes & Robert Hahn & Robert Metcalfe & Itzhak Rasooly, 2022. "Fatalism, beliefs, and behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 64(2), pages 147-190, April.
    18. Juliet Aweko & Jeroen De Man & Pilvikki Absetz & Claes-Göran Östenson & Stefan Swartling Peterson & Helle Mölsted Alvesson & Meena Daivadanam, 2018. "Patient and Provider Dilemmas of Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management: A Qualitative Study in Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Communities in Stockholm," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, August.
    19. Bazzi, Samuel & Fiszbein, Martin & Gebresilasse, Mesay, 2021. "“Rugged individualism” and collective (in)action during the COVID-19 pandemic," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    20. Dorison, Charles A & Lerner, Jennifer S & Heller, Blake H & Rothman, Alexander J & Kawachi, Ichiro I & Wang, Ke & Rees, Vaughan W & Gill, Brian P & Gibbs, Nancy & Ebersole, Charles R & Vally, Zahir & , 2022. "In COVID-19 health messaging, loss framing increases anxiety with little-to-no concomitant benefits : Experimental evidence from 84 countries," Other publications TiSEM 235f67b6-6be5-4061-8693-3, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:23:p:16503-:d:1292904. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.