IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i22p15764-d1276607.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Multi-Objective Models for Waste-to-Energy and Waste Separation Site Selection

Author

Listed:
  • Atour Taghipour

    (Faculty of International Business, Normandy University, 76600 Le Havre, France)

  • Parvaneh Zeraati Foukolaei

    (Department of Management, Jouibar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Jouibar 8613147761, Iran)

  • Maryam Ghaedi

    (Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar 4741613534, Iran)

  • Moein Khazaei

    (Department of Industrial Management, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran 1411713116, Iran)

Abstract

In the past, the Iranian government has excessively relied on fossil fuels, gas, and oil resources, leading to energy-related issues and increasing power outages in the provinces during peak seasons. One of the best opportunities for energy production in Iran is through the establishment of bio-methane and waste-based energy parks. This research aims to determine the optimal locations for waste sorting centers and the establishment of waste-to-energy plants. The coexistence and interaction of these two facilities will enhance system efficiency. To achieve this goal, two mathematical models, with three objectives, have been designed. The static allocation model assigns each industrial park to a waste sorting center, while the dynamic allocation model selects the shortest route from the industrial park to the waste-to-energy center. The first objective is to minimize establishment costs, while the second and third objectives aim to reduce the system’s waiting costs. Waiting for waste shipments leads to pollution, and the desirability and route length can increase the likelihood of organic pollution. Therefore, this research seeks to minimize these factors. The model results indicate that the sorting and energy production centers have been selected to incur the lowest establishment, transportation, and waiting costs. Additionally, the sensitivity analysis section of the model reveals the impact of coefficient changes on the model’s results.

Suggested Citation

  • Atour Taghipour & Parvaneh Zeraati Foukolaei & Maryam Ghaedi & Moein Khazaei, 2023. "Sustainable Multi-Objective Models for Waste-to-Energy and Waste Separation Site Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-18, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:22:p:15764-:d:1276607
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/22/15764/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/22/15764/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Javid Ghahremani-Nahr & Hamed Nozari & Maryam Rahmaty & Parvaneh Zeraati Foukolaei & Azita Sherejsharifi, 2023. "Development of a Novel Fuzzy Hierarchical Location-Routing Optimization Model Considering Reliability," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-16, September.
    2. Khan, Imran & Kabir, Zobaidul, 2020. "Waste-to-energy generation technologies and the developing economies: A multi-criteria analysis for sustainability assessment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 320-333.
    3. Chen, Heng & Li, Jiarui & Li, Tongyu & Xu, Gang & Jin, Xi & Wang, Min & Liu, Tong, 2022. "Performance assessment of a novel medical-waste-to-energy design based on plasma gasification and integrated with a municipal solid waste incineration plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    4. Luo, Chao & Ju, Yanbing & Santibanez Gonzalez, Ernesto D.R. & Dong, Peiwu & Wang, Aihua, 2020. "The waste-to-energy incineration plant site selection based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic Best-Worst method ANP and double parameters TOPSIS approach: A case study in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mehdi Tajpour & Fatemeh Dekamini & Shima SafarMohammadluo & Moein Norouzi Movahed & Farzaneh madadpour, 2025. "The impact of innovation management on the sustainability of small and medium enterprises with the role of entrepreneurship mediation," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-19, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ramezani, Mohammad & Khazaei, Moein & Gholian-Jouybari, Fatemeh & Sandoval-Correa, Alejandro & Bonakdari, Hossein & Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, Mostafa, 2024. "Turquoise hydrogen and waste optimization: A Bi-objective closed-loop and sustainable supply chain model for a case in Mexico," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    2. Caferra, Rocco & D'Adamo, Idiano & Morone, Piergiuseppe, 2023. "Wasting energy or energizing waste? The public acceptance of waste-to-energy technology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PE).
    3. Vlasopoulos, Antonis & Malinauskaite, Jurgita & Żabnieńska-Góra, Alina & Jouhara, Hussam, 2023. "Life cycle assessment of plastic waste and energy recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    4. Yang, Shi-guan & Zhou, Jia-le & Hu, Zhuang & Zhou, Xin-yue & Cai, Qi & Xie, Jin-heng & Wu, Yang-wen & Lu, Qiang, 2023. "Site selection decision framework for biomass pyrolysis project based on a mixed method under probabilistic linguistic environment and low carbon perspective: A case study in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    5. Vlachokostas, Ch. & Michailidou, A.V. & Achillas, Ch., 2021. "Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis towards promoting Waste-to-Energy Management Strategies: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    6. Zhou, Jianli & Chen, Zhuohao & Wu, Shuxian & Yang, Cheng & Wang, Yaqi & Wu, Yunna, 2024. "Potential assessment and development obstacle analysis of CCUS layout in China: A combined interpretive model based on GIS-DEMATEL-ISM," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    7. Ferraz de Campos, Victor Arruda & Silva, Valter Bruno & Cardoso, João Sousa & Brito, Paulo S. & Tuna, Celso Eduardo & Silveira, José Luz, 2021. "A review of waste management in Brazil and Portugal: Waste-to-energy as pathway for sustainable development," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 802-820.
    8. Victor Arruda Ferraz de Campos & Luís Carmo-Calado & Roberta Mota-Panizio & Vitor Matos & Valter Bruno Silva & Paulo S. Brito & Daniela F. L. Eusébio & Celso Eduardo Tuna & José Luz Silveira, 2023. "A Waste-to-Energy Technical Approach: Syngas–Biodiesel Blend for Power Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-18, October.
    9. Zhou, Jianzhao & Liu, Chaoshuo & Ren, Jingzheng & He, Chang, 2024. "Targeting carbon-neutral waste reduction: Novel process design, modelling and optimization for converting medical waste into hydrogen," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    10. Huijia Yang & Weiguang Fan & Guangyu Qin & Zhenyu Zhao, 2021. "A Fuzzy-ANP Approach for Comprehensive Benefit Evaluation of Grid-Side Commercial Storage Project," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    11. Urošević, Branka Gvozdenac & Marinović, Budimirka, 2021. "Ranking construction of small hydro power plants using multi-criteria decision analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 1174-1183.
    12. Chen, Heng & Li, Jiarui & Li, Tongyu & Xu, Gang & Jin, Xi & Wang, Min & Liu, Tong, 2022. "Performance assessment of a novel medical-waste-to-energy design based on plasma gasification and integrated with a municipal solid waste incineration plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    13. Marta Wiśniewska & Andrzej Kulig & Krystyna Lelicińska-Serafin, 2021. "Odour Nuisance at Municipal Waste Biogas Plants and the Effect of Feedstock Modification on the Circular Economy—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-22, October.
    14. Yuqing Liao & Yongchao Ma & Jingliang Chen & Ruirui Liu, 2020. "Evaluation of the Level of Sustainable Development of Provinces in China from 2012 to 2018: A Study Based on the Improved Entropy Coefficient-TOPSIS Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, March.
    15. Gao, Jing & Wang, Chao & Wang, Zhanwu & Lin, Jin & Zhang, Runkai & Wu, Xin & Xu, Guangyin & Wang, Zhenfeng, 2024. "Site selection decision for biomass cogeneration projects from a sustainable perspective: A case study of China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).
    16. Thakur, Disha & Kumar, Sanjay & Kumar, Vineet & Kaur, Tarlochan, 2024. "Estimation of calorific value using an artificial neural network based on stochastic ultimate analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    17. Rafael Ninno Muniz & Carlos Tavares da Costa Júnior & William Gouvêa Buratto & Ademir Nied & Gabriel Villarrubia González, 2023. "The Sustainability Concept: A Review Focusing on Energy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-22, September.
    18. Pawlak-Kruczek, Halina & Mularski, Jakub & Ostrycharczyk, Michał & Czerep, Michał & Baranowski, Marcin & Mączka, Tadeusz & Sadowski, Krzysztof & Hulisz, Patryk, 2023. "Application of plasma burners for char combustion in a pulverized coal-fired (PC) boiler – Experimental and numerical analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    19. Liu, Yuhao & Li, Aijun & Guo, Guangzhao & Zhang, Junwei & Ren, Yang & Dong, Lu & Gong, Lifang & Hu, Hongyun & Yao, Hong & Naruse, Ichiro, 2024. "Comparative life cycle assessment of organic industrial solid waste co-disposal in a MSW incineration plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    20. Yu, Yiling, 2023. "Role of Natural resources rent on economic growth: Fresh empirical insight from selected developing economies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:22:p:15764-:d:1276607. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.