IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i21p15283-d1267238.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prediction of Battery Remaining Useful Life Using Machine Learning Algorithms

Author

Listed:
  • J. N. Chandra Sekhar

    (Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Sri Venkateswara University, Tirupati 517502, India)

  • Bullarao Domathoti

    (Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Shree Institute of Technological Education, Tirupati 517501, India)

  • Ernesto D. R. Santibanez Gonzalez

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and CES 4.0, Faculty of Engineering, University of Talca, Curico 3340000, Chile)

Abstract

Electrified transportation systems are emerging quickly worldwide, helping to diminish carbon gas emissions and paving the way for the reduction of global warming possessions. Battery remaining useful life (RUL) prediction is gaining attention in real world applications to tone down maintenance expenses and improve system reliability and efficiency. RUL forms the prominent component of fault analysis forecast and health management when the equipment operation life cycle is considered. The uprightness of RUL prediction is vital in providing the effectiveness of electric batteries and reducing the chance of battery illness. In assessing battery performance, the existing prediction approaches are unsatisfactory even though the battery operational parameters are well tabulated. In addition, battery management has an important contribution to several sustainable development goals, such as Clean and Affordable Energy (SDG 7), and Climate Action (SDG 13). The current work attempts to increase the prediction accuracy and robustness with selected machine learning algorithms. A Real battery life cycle data set from the Hawaii National Energy Institute (HNEI) is used to evaluate accuracy estimation using selected machine learning algorithms and is validated in Google Co-laboratory using Python. Evaluated error metrics such as Mean Square Error (MSE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), R-Squared, and execution time are computed for different L methods and relevant inferences are presented which highlight the potential of battery RUL prediction close to the most accurate values.

Suggested Citation

  • J. N. Chandra Sekhar & Bullarao Domathoti & Ernesto D. R. Santibanez Gonzalez, 2023. "Prediction of Battery Remaining Useful Life Using Machine Learning Algorithms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-28, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:21:p:15283-:d:1267238
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/21/15283/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/21/15283/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hu, Chao & Jain, Gaurav & Zhang, Puqiang & Schmidt, Craig & Gomadam, Parthasarathy & Gorka, Tom, 2014. "Data-driven method based on particle swarm optimization and k-nearest neighbor regression for estimating capacity of lithium-ion battery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 49-55.
    2. Luping Chen & Liangjun Xu & Yilin Zhou, 2018. "Novel Approach for Lithium-Ion Battery On-Line Remaining Useful Life Prediction Based on Permutation Entropy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-15, April.
    3. Wang, Yujie & Tian, Jiaqiang & Sun, Zhendong & Wang, Li & Xu, Ruilong & Li, Mince & Chen, Zonghai, 2020. "A comprehensive review of battery modeling and state estimation approaches for advanced battery management systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    4. Si, Xiao-Sheng & Wang, Wenbin & Hu, Chang-Hua & Zhou, Dong-Hua, 2011. "Remaining useful life estimation - A review on the statistical data driven approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 1-14, August.
    5. Syed Mithun Ali & Andrea Appolloni & Fausto Cavallaro & Idiano D’Adamo & Assunta Di Vaio & Francesco Ferella & Massimo Gastaldi & Muhammad Ikram & Nallapaneni Manoj Kumar & Michael Alan Martin & Abdul, 2023. "Development Goals towards Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-11, June.
    6. Ma, Jian & Shang, Pengchao & Zou, Xinyu & Ma, Ning & Ding, Yu & Sun, Jinwen & Cheng, Yujie & Tao, Laifa & Lu, Chen & Su, Yuzhuan & Chong, Jin & Jin, Haizu & Lin, Yongshou, 2021. "A hybrid transfer learning scheme for remaining useful life prediction and cycle life test optimization of different formulation Li-ion power batteries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PA).
    7. Wu, Ji & Zhang, Chenbin & Chen, Zonghai, 2016. "An online method for lithium-ion battery remaining useful life estimation using importance sampling and neural networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 134-140.
    8. Thelen, Adam & Li, Meng & Hu, Chao & Bekyarova, Elena & Kalinin, Sergey & Sanghadasa, Mohan, 2022. "Augmented model-based framework for battery remaining useful life prediction," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    9. Yang, Yixin, 2021. "A machine-learning prediction method of lithium-ion battery life based on charge process for different applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    10. Guo, Junyu & Wan, Jia-Lun & Yang, Yan & Dai, Le & Tang, Aimin & Huang, Bangkui & Zhang, Fangfang & Li, He, 2023. "A deep feature learning method for remaining useful life prediction of drilling pumps," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Zengkai & Zeng, Shengkui & Guo, Jianbin & Qin, Taichun, 2019. "State of health estimation of lithium-ion batteries based on the constant voltage charging curve," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 661-669.
    2. Li, Yi & Liu, Kailong & Foley, Aoife M. & Zülke, Alana & Berecibar, Maitane & Nanini-Maury, Elise & Van Mierlo, Joeri & Hoster, Harry E., 2019. "Data-driven health estimation and lifetime prediction of lithium-ion batteries: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Xiaodong Xu & Chuanqiang Yu & Shengjin Tang & Xiaoyan Sun & Xiaosheng Si & Lifeng Wu, 2019. "Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on Wiener Processes with Considering the Relaxation Effect," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, May.
    4. Sui, Xin & He, Shan & Vilsen, Søren B. & Meng, Jinhao & Teodorescu, Remus & Stroe, Daniel-Ioan, 2021. "A review of non-probabilistic machine learning-based state of health estimation techniques for Lithium-ion battery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 300(C).
    5. Xiaoyu Li & Xing Shu & Jiangwei Shen & Renxin Xiao & Wensheng Yan & Zheng Chen, 2017. "An On-Board Remaining Useful Life Estimation Algorithm for Lithium-Ion Batteries of Electric Vehicles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-15, May.
    6. Semeraro, Concetta & Caggiano, Mariateresa & Olabi, Abdul-Ghani & Dassisti, Michele, 2022. "Battery monitoring and prognostics optimization techniques: Challenges and opportunities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    7. Ni, Yulong & Xu, Jianing & Zhu, Chunbo & Pei, Lei, 2022. "Accurate residual capacity estimation of retired LiFePO4 batteries based on mechanism and data-driven model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    8. Jiang, Bo & Zhu, Jiangong & Wang, Xueyuan & Wei, Xuezhe & Shang, Wenlong & Dai, Haifeng, 2022. "A comparative study of different features extracted from electrochemical impedance spectroscopy in state of health estimation for lithium-ion batteries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    9. Chen, Dinghong & Zhang, Weige & Zhang, Caiping & Sun, Bingxiang & Cong, XinWei & Wei, Shaoyuan & Jiang, Jiuchun, 2022. "A novel deep learning-based life prediction method for lithium-ion batteries with strong generalization capability under multiple cycle profiles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 327(C).
    10. Li, Sai & Fang, Huajing & Shi, Bing, 2021. "Remaining useful life estimation of Lithium-ion battery based on interacting multiple model particle filter and support vector regression," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    11. Xiaojie Ke & Zhengguo Xu & Wenhai Wang & Youxian Sun, 2017. "Remaining useful life prediction for non-stationary degradation processes with shocks," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 231(5), pages 469-480, October.
    12. Sohn, Suyeon & Byun, Ha-Eun & Lee, Jay H., 2022. "Two-stage deep learning for online prediction of knee-point in Li-ion battery capacity degradation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    13. Fei, Zicheng & Yang, Fangfang & Tsui, Kwok-Leung & Li, Lishuai & Zhang, Zijun, 2021. "Early prediction of battery lifetime via a machine learning based framework," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    14. Shunli Wang & Pu Ren & Paul Takyi-Aninakwa & Siyu Jin & Carlos Fernandez, 2022. "A Critical Review of Improved Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Multi-Timescale State Prediction of Lithium-Ion Batteries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-27, July.
    15. Zhang, Jianyu & Lu, Wei, 2022. "Sparse data machine learning for battery health estimation and optimal design incorporating material characteristics," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    16. Chunxiang Zhu & Zhiwei He & Zhengyi Bao & Changcheng Sun & Mingyu Gao, 2023. "Prognosis of Lithium-Ion Batteries’ Remaining Useful Life Based on a Sequence-to-Sequence Model with Variational Mode Decomposition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-16, January.
    17. Rauf, Huzaifa & Khalid, Muhammad & Arshad, Naveed, 2022. "Machine learning in state of health and remaining useful life estimation: Theoretical and technological development in battery degradation modelling," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    18. Ma, Yan & Shan, Ce & Gao, Jinwu & Chen, Hong, 2022. "A novel method for state of health estimation of lithium-ion batteries based on improved LSTM and health indicators extraction," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    19. Molla Shahadat Hossain Lipu & Tahia F. Karim & Shaheer Ansari & Md. Sazal Miah & Md. Siddikur Rahman & Sheikh T. Meraj & Rajvikram Madurai Elavarasan & Raghavendra Rajan Vijayaraghavan, 2022. "Intelligent SOX Estimation for Automotive Battery Management Systems: State-of-the-Art Deep Learning Approaches, Open Issues, and Future Research Opportunities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-31, December.
    20. Chang, Yang & Fang, Huajing & Zhang, Yong, 2017. "A new hybrid method for the prediction of the remaining useful life of a lithium-ion battery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1564-1578.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:21:p:15283-:d:1267238. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.