IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i19p14555-d1255078.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the Technical, Economic, and Environmental Performance of Solar Water Heating System for Residential Applications–Comparison of Two Different Working Fluids (Water and Glycol)

Author

Listed:
  • Ephraim Bonah Agyekum

    (Department of Nuclear and Renewable Energy, Ural Federal University Named after the First President of Russia Boris Yeltsin, Mira 19 St., 620002 Ekaterinburg, Russia)

  • Tahir Khan

    (College of Electrical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China)

  • Nimay Chandra Giri

    (Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Centurion University of Technology and Management, Jatni 752050, Odisha, India)

Abstract

The use of solar water heaters (SWH) in both residential and commercial facilities is one of the possible ways to reduce electricity bills and the release of greenhouse gases (GHG). This study assessed the technical, economic, and environmental performance of a SWH system at six different locations in China (i.e., Lhasa, Lauchang, Wuhan, Kashi, Yumen, and Harbin). A comparison between two different working fluids (i.e., water and glycol) were modeled in the System Advisor Model in all six cities. A sensitivity analysis was conducted on some key technical and economic parameters to assess the impact of such parameters on the performance of SWH systems in the country. According to the results, Lhasa recorded the highest capacity factor of 11% and 10.70% using water and glycol as the working fluid, respectively. Lhasa was identified as the best location among the studied locations due to its high solar irradiation. The optimization study indicates that the optimum azimuth for China is 190°. It was also found that a 25% reduction in the outlet set temperature of the water can reduce the capacity factor from 11% to about 9.2%. Using the SWH as simulated in this study can reduce carbon dioxide emissions from 1252.87–2014.85 kg per year to 138.20–330.23 kg per year; the extent of reduction depends on the location of the SWHS, and the solar energy available at the area. Net electricity bill savings of $156–296 could be obtained if SWH systems were installed and used at the studied locations.

Suggested Citation

  • Ephraim Bonah Agyekum & Tahir Khan & Nimay Chandra Giri, 2023. "Evaluating the Technical, Economic, and Environmental Performance of Solar Water Heating System for Residential Applications–Comparison of Two Different Working Fluids (Water and Glycol)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-24, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14555-:d:1255078
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14555/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14555/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lioua Kolsi & Sameer Al-Dahidi & Souad Kamel & Walid Aich & Sahbi Boubaker & Nidhal Ben Khedher, 2022. "Prediction of Solar Energy Yield Based on Artificial Intelligence Techniques for the Ha’il Region, Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Huang, Ping, 2019. "The verticality of policy mixes for sustainability transitions: A case study of solar water heating in China," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(10).
    3. Alexandru Şerban & Nicoleta Bărbuţă-Mişu & Nicoleta Ciucescu & Simona Paraschiv & Spiru Paraschiv, 2016. "Economic and Environmental Analysis of Investing in Solar Water Heating Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-21, December.
    4. Abdelhady, Suzan & Borello, Domenico & Shaban, Ahmed, 2018. "Techno-economic assessment of biomass power plant fed with rice straw: Sensitivity and parametric analysis of the performance and the LCOE," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 1026-1034.
    5. Jahangiri Mamouri, S. & Gholami Derami, H. & Ghiasi, M. & Shafii, M.B. & Shiee, Z., 2014. "Experimental investigation of the effect of using thermosyphon heat pipes and vacuum glass on the performance of solar still," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 501-507.
    6. Aly, Ahmed & Bernardos, Ana & Fernandez-Peruchena, Carlos M. & Jensen, Steen Solvang & Pedersen, Anders Branth, 2019. "Is Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) a feasible option for Sub-Saharan Africa?: Investigating the techno-economic feasibility of CSP in Tanzania," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 1224-1240.
    7. Syed Ali Raza & Syed Sulman Ahmad & Tahir Abdul Hussain Ratlamwala & Ghulam Hussain & Mohammed Alkahtani, 2020. "Techno-Economic Analysis of Glazed, Unglazed and Evacuated Tube Solar Water Heaters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-18, November.
    8. García, José Luis & Porras-Prieto, Carlos Javier & Benavente, Rosa María & Gómez-Villarino, María Teresa & Mazarrón, Fernando R., 2019. "Profitability of a solar water heating system with evacuated tube collector in the meat industry," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 966-976.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Walmsley, Timothy Gordon & Philipp, Matthias & Picón-Núñez, Martín & Meschede, Henning & Taylor, Matthew Thomas & Schlosser, Florian & Atkins, Martin John, 2023. "Hybrid renewable energy utility systems for industrial sites: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    2. Chen, Qian & Alrowais, Raid & Burhan, Muhammad & Ybyraiymkul, Doskhan & Shahzad, Muhammad Wakil & Li, Yong & Ng, Kim Choon, 2020. "A self-sustainable solar desalination system using direct spray technology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    3. Nawaz Edoo & Robert T. F. Ah King, 2021. "Techno-Economic Analysis of Utility-Scale Solar Photovoltaic Plus Battery Power Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-22, December.
    4. Ersöz, Mustafa Ali, 2016. "Effects of different working fluid use on the energy and exergy performance for evacuated tube solar collector with thermosyphon heat pipe," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA), pages 244-256.
    5. Hadi Tannous & Valentina Stojceska & Savas A. Tassou, 2023. "The Use of Solar Thermal Heating in SPIRE and Non-SPIRE Industrial Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-18, May.
    6. Gutiérrez-Alvarez, R. & Guerra, K. & Haro, P., 2023. "Market profitability of CSP-biomass hybrid power plants: Towards a firm supply of renewable energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 335(C).
    7. Nimmanterdwong, Prathana & Chalermsinsuwan, Benjapon & Piumsomboon, Pornpote, 2023. "Optimizing utilization pathways for biomass to chemicals and energy by integrating emergy analysis and particle swarm optimization (PSO)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 1448-1459.
    8. Yuan, Jiahang & Luo, Xinggang & Ding, Xianghai & Liu, Chunlai & Li, Cunbin, 2019. "Biomass power generation fuel procurement and storage modes evaluation: A case study in Jilin," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 75-86.
    9. Hu, Mingke & Pei, Gang & Wang, Qiliang & Li, Jing & Wang, Yunyun & Ji, Jie, 2016. "Field test and preliminary analysis of a combined diurnal solar heating and nocturnal radiative cooling system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 899-908.
    10. Shafieian, Abdellah & Khiadani, Mehdi & Nosrati, Ataollah, 2018. "A review of latest developments, progress, and applications of heat pipe solar collectors," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 273-304.
    11. Paula Kivimaa & Karoline S. Rogge, 2020. "Interplay of Policy Experimentation and Institutional Change in Transformative Policy Mixes: The Case of Mobility as a Service in Finland," SPRU Working Paper Series 2020-17, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    12. Jakob T. Pruess, 2023. "Unraveling the complexity of extended producer responsibility policy mix design, implementation, and transfer dynamics in the European Union," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(6), pages 1500-1520, December.
    13. Zhao, Ge & Zhou, P. & Wen, Wen, 2022. "What cause regional inequality of technology innovation in renewable energy? Evidence from China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    14. Tazi, Nacef & Safaei, Fatemeh & Hnaien, Faicel, 2022. "Assessment of the levelized cost of energy using a stochastic model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PB).
    15. Zhao, Ge & Zhou, P. & Wen, Wen, 2021. "Feed-in tariffs, knowledge stocks and renewable energy technology innovation: The role of local government intervention," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    16. Ephraim Bonah Agyekum & Tomiwa Sunday Adebayo & Festus Victor Bekun & Nallapaneni Manoj Kumar & Manoj Kumar Panjwani, 2021. "Effect of Two Different Heat Transfer Fluids on the Performance of Solar Tower CSP by Comparing Recompression Supercritical CO 2 and Rankine Power Cycles, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-19, June.
    17. Qiaonan Yang & Can Hu & Jie Li & Xiaokang Yi & Yichuan He & Jie Zhang & Zhilin Sun, 2021. "A Separation and Desalination Process for Farmland Saline-Alkaline Water," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, October.
    18. Chennaif, Mohammed & Maaouane, Mohamed & Zahboune, Hassan & Elhafyani, Mohammed & Zouggar, Smail, 2022. "Tri-objective techno-economic sizing optimization of Off-grid and On-grid renewable energy systems using Electric system Cascade Extended analysis and system Advisor Model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    19. Kamath, Harsh G. & Majumdar, Rudrodip & Krishnan, A.V. & Srikanth, R., 2022. "Cost and environmental benefits of coal-concentrated solar power (CSP) hybridization in India," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    20. He, Jiaxin & Liu, Ying & Lin, Boqiang, 2018. "Should China support the development of biomass power generation?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 416-425.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14555-:d:1255078. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.