IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i19p14380-d1251028.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Post-Disaster Resilience Optimization for Road–Bridge Transportation Systems Considering Economic Loss

Author

Listed:
  • Jiangbin Zhao

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China
    Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Mine Electromechanical Equipment Intelligent Detection and Control, Xi’an 710054, China)

  • Mengtao Liang

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China
    Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Mine Electromechanical Equipment Intelligent Detection and Control, Xi’an 710054, China)

  • Zaoyan Zhang

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China
    Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Mine Electromechanical Equipment Intelligent Detection and Control, Xi’an 710054, China)

  • Xiangang Cao

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China
    Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Mine Electromechanical Equipment Intelligent Detection and Control, Xi’an 710054, China)

  • Qi Lu

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China
    Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Mine Electromechanical Equipment Intelligent Detection and Control, Xi’an 710054, China)

  • Zhiqiang Cai

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, School of Mechanical Engineering, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, China)

Abstract

After a disaster, the recovery sequence of damaged bridges in a road–bridge transportation system greatly influences system restoration time and total economic loss. In this paper, the skew of recovery trajectory is introduced to evaluate the average restoration time, and the total economic loss is extended to consider the indirect loss, such as the energy consumption of detours or the emergency service fee. So, the post-disaster resilience optimization model is constructed by minimizing the total economic loss. The improved genetic algorithm is developed to obtain the optimal recovery scheme for damaged bridges by considering the recovery sequence and repair modes. The composition and influence factors of total economic loss are analyzed through three experiments. The experimental results show that the indirect loss accounts for approximately half of the economic loss, while the higher price of emergency service promotes the reduction of indirect loss using the expedited modes to repair damaged bridges. Moreover, to minimize the total economic loss, it is essential to design the optimal recovery scheme (repair sequence and repair mode) wisely to balance the conflicts between indirect loss and direct loss.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiangbin Zhao & Mengtao Liang & Zaoyan Zhang & Xiangang Cao & Qi Lu & Zhiqiang Cai, 2023. "Post-Disaster Resilience Optimization for Road–Bridge Transportation Systems Considering Economic Loss," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-19, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14380-:d:1251028
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14380/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14380/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Magoua, Joseph Jonathan & Li, Nan, 2023. "The human factor in the disaster resilience modeling of critical infrastructure systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    2. Tsai-Yun Liao & Ta-Yin Hu & Yi-No Ko, 2018. "A resilience optimization model for transportation networks under disasters," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 93(1), pages 469-489, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zou, Qiling & Chen, Suren, 2019. "Enhancing resilience of interdependent traffic-electric power system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    2. Zhaoming Yang & Qi Xiang & Yuxuan He & Shiliang Peng & Michael Havbro Faber & Enrico Zio & Lili Zuo & Huai Su & Jinjun Zhang, 2023. "Resilience of Natural Gas Pipeline System: A Review and Outlook," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-19, August.
    3. Liu, Aijun & Li, Zengxian & Shang, Wen-Long & Ochieng, Washington, 2023. "Performance evaluation model of transportation infrastructure: Perspective of COVID-19," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    4. Mrinal Kanti Sen & Subhrajit Dutta & Golam Kabir, 2021. "Flood Resilience of Housing Infrastructure Modeling and Quantification Using a Bayesian Belief Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-24, January.
    5. Gonçalves, L.A.P.J. & Ribeiro, P.J.G., 2020. "Resilience of urban transportation systems. Concept, characteristics, and methods," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    6. Malandri, Caterina & Mantecchini, Luca & Postorino, Maria Nadia, 2023. "A comprehensive approach to assess transportation system resilience towards disruptive events. Case study on airside airport systems," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 109-122.
    7. Azucena Román-de la Sancha & Rodolfo Silva, 2020. "Multivariable Analysis of Transport Network Seismic Performance: Mexico City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-40, November.
    8. Pan, Shouzheng & Yan, Hai & He, Jia & He, Zhengbing, 2021. "Vulnerability and resilience of transportation systems: A recent literature review," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 581(C).
    9. Wang, Xinglong & Peng, Jinhan & Tang, Junqing & Lu, Qiuchen & Li, Xiaowei, 2022. "Investigating the impact of adding new airline routes on air transportation resilience in China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 79-95.
    10. Xu, Min & Li, Guoyuan & Chen, Anthony, 2024. "Resilience-driven post-disaster restoration of interdependent infrastructure systems under different decision-making environments," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    11. Chen, Jinqu & Liu, Jie & Peng, Qiyuan & Yin, Yong, 2022. "Resilience assessment of an urban rail transit network: A case study of Chengdu subway," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 586(C).
    12. Milad Zamanifar & Timo Hartmann, 2020. "Optimization-based decision-making models for disaster recovery and reconstruction planning of transportation networks," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 104(1), pages 1-25, October.
    13. Farnaz Khaghani & Farrokh Jazizadeh, 2020. "mD-Resilience: A Multi-Dimensional Approach for Resilience-Based Performance Assessment in Urban Transportation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-23, June.
    14. Mohammad Zaher Serdar & Sami G. Al-Ghamdi, 2021. "Resiliency Assessment of Road Networks during Mega Sport Events: The Case of FIFA World Cup Qatar 2022," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-15, November.
    15. Himadri Sen Gupta & Omar M. Nofal & Andrés D. González & Charles D. Nicholson & John W. van de Lindt, 2022. "Optimal Selection of Short- and Long-Term Mitigation Strategies for Buildings within Communities under Flooding Hazard," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-20, August.
    16. Meng Wei & Jiangang Xu & Yiwen Wang, 2022. "Resilience Assessment of Traffic Networks in Coastal Cities under Climate Change: A Case Study of One City with Unique Land Use Characteristics," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-21, October.
    17. Tao Ji & Yanhong Yao & Yue Dou & Shejun Deng & Shijun Yu & Yunqiang Zhu & Huajun Liao, 2022. "The Impact of Climate Change on Urban Transportation Resilience to Compound Extreme Events," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, March.
    18. Qingjie Qi & Yangyang Meng & Xiaofei Zhao & Jianzhong Liu, 2022. "Resilience Assessment of an Urban Metro Complex Network: A Case Study of the Zhengzhou Metro," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-19, September.
    19. Rita Der Sarkissian & Anas Dabaj & Youssef Diab & Marc Vuillet, 2021. "Evaluating the Implementation of the “Build-Back-Better” Concept for Critical Infrastructure Systems: Lessons from Saint-Martin’s Island Following Hurricane Irma," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-25, March.
    20. Davide Forcellini, 2023. "The Role of Redundancy of Infrastructures on the Seismic Resilience (SR) of Sustainable Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-13, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14380-:d:1251028. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.