IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i18p13768-d1240605.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

River Flood Risk Assessment in Communities of the Peruvian Andes: A Semiquantitative Application for Disaster Prevention

Author

Listed:
  • Dennis Ccopi-Trucios

    (Faculty of Engineering, Professional School of Environmental Engineering, Universidad Continental, Huancayo 12000, Peru)

  • Brissette Barzola-Rojas

    (Faculty of Engineering, Professional School of Environmental Engineering, Universidad Continental, Huancayo 12000, Peru)

  • Sheyla Ruiz-Soto

    (Faculty of Engineering, Professional School of Environmental Engineering, Universidad Continental, Huancayo 12000, Peru)

  • Edwin Gabriel-Campos

    (Faculty of Engineering, Professional School of Environmental Engineering, Universidad Continental, Huancayo 12000, Peru
    Academic Department of Geographic Sciences, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima 15081, Peru)

  • Kevin Ortega-Quispe

    (Faculty of Engineering, Professional School of Environmental Engineering, Universidad Continental, Huancayo 12000, Peru)

  • Franklin Cordova-Buiza

    (Research, Innovation, and Social Responsibility Department, Universidad Privada del Norte, Lima 15314, Peru
    Faculty of Business Sciences, Universidad Católica Santo Toribio de Mogrovejo, Chiclayo 14012, Peru)

Abstract

River floods are common natural phenomena that occur when the flow of water exceeds the capacity of a river due to excessive rainfall. In the Peruvian territory, the heavy rains of 2010 had consequences of great magnitude, leaving more than 5000 people affected and 25 dead in the Peruvian Andes. This research aimed to analyze and determine the level of risk due to river floods in communities of the Peruvian Andes in terms of hazard and vulnerability, using a semi-quantitative methodology and applying a multi-criteria analysis with vector information and raster from the national spatial data infrastructure that acted as triggering and conditioning factors, as well as conducting fieldwork with the application of targeted surveys. Then, the geoprocessing of thematic maps through GIS software was carried out. The research findings indicate that virtually the entire study area, approximately 99.26%, is at a high level of hazard, with only a small 0.74% classified as very high hazard. In other words, the entire studied territory is susceptible to floods. Furthermore, it is noteworthy that over 75% of the households in this area face vulnerability to floods, resulting in 99.15% of them being categorized at a high-risk level. It is concluded that river flooding represents a potential risk in large areas of the high Andean community due to the existence of various social, economic and environmental factors that make this phenomenon catastrophic.

Suggested Citation

  • Dennis Ccopi-Trucios & Brissette Barzola-Rojas & Sheyla Ruiz-Soto & Edwin Gabriel-Campos & Kevin Ortega-Quispe & Franklin Cordova-Buiza, 2023. "River Flood Risk Assessment in Communities of the Peruvian Andes: A Semiquantitative Application for Disaster Prevention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-15, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:13768-:d:1240605
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13768/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13768/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liberatore, Matthew J. & Nydick, Robert L., 2008. "The analytic hierarchy process in medical and health care decision making: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(1), pages 194-207, August.
    2. Vaidya, Omkarprasad S. & Kumar, Sushil, 2006. "Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(1), pages 1-29, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wenshuai Wu & Gang Kou, 2016. "A group consensus model for evaluating real estate investment alternatives," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 2(1), pages 1-10, December.
    2. James G. Dolan & Emily Boohaker & Jeroan Allison & Thomas F. Imperiale, 2013. "Patients’ Preferences and Priorities Regarding Colorectal Cancer Screening," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 33(1), pages 59-70, January.
    3. A Ishizaka & D Balkenborg & T Kaplan, 2011. "Influence of aggregation and measurement scale on ranking a compromise alternative in AHP," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(4), pages 700-710, April.
    4. Kułakowski, Konrad & Mazurek, Jiří & Ramík, Jaroslav & Soltys, Michael, 2019. "When is the condition of order preservation met?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(1), pages 248-254.
    5. Anna Rita Corvino & Pasquale Manco & Elpidio Maria Garzillo & Maria Grazia Lourdes Monaco & Alessandro Greco & Salvatore Gerbino & Francesco Caputo & Roberto Macchiaroli & Monica Lamberti, 2021. "Assessing Risks Awareness in Operating Rooms among Post-Graduate Students: A Pilot Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-12, March.
    6. Zorica Dodevska & Sandro Radovanović & Andrija Petrović & Boris Delibašić, 2023. "When Fairness Meets Consistency in AHP Pairwise Comparisons," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, January.
    7. BULUT, Merve & ÖZCAN, Evrencan, 2021. "A new approach to determine maintenance periods of the most critical hydroelectric power plant equipment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    8. Hanwen Chen & Wang Dong & Hongling Han & Nan Zhou, 2017. "A comprehensive and quantitative internal control index: construction, validation, and impact," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 49(2), pages 337-377, August.
    9. Matthew Liberatore & Robert Nydick & Constantine Daskalakis & Elisabeth Kunkel & James Cocroft & Ronald Myers, 2009. "Helping Men Decide About Scheduling a Prostate Cancer Screening Exam," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 39(3), pages 209-217, June.
    10. Jana Krejčí & Alessio Ishizaka, 2018. "FAHPSort: A Fuzzy Extension of the AHPSort Method," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(04), pages 1119-1145, July.
    11. A Ishizaka & D Balkenborg & T Kaplan, 2011. "Does AHP help us make a choice? An experimental evaluation," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(10), pages 1801-1812, October.
    12. Hanming Li & Xingquan Chen & Yiwei Fang, 2021. "The Development Strategy of Home-Based Exercise in China Based on the SWOT-AHP Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-12, January.
    13. Nina Almasifar & Tülay Özdemir Canbolat & Milad Akhavan & Roberto Alonso González-Lezcano, 2021. "Proposing a New Methodology for Monument Conservation “SCOPE MANAGEMENT” by the Use of an Analytic Hierarchy Process Project Management Institute System and the ICOMOS Burra Charter," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-13, November.
    14. Thomas L. Saaty, 2013. "The Modern Science of Multicriteria Decision Making and Its Practical Applications: The AHP/ANP Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(5), pages 1101-1118, October.
    15. Sushil, 2019. "Efficient interpretive ranking process incorporating implicit and transitive dominance relationships," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 1489-1516, December.
    16. Wang, Ying-Ming & Elhag, Taha M.S., 2007. "A goal programming method for obtaining interval weights from an interval comparison matrix," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(1), pages 458-471, February.
    17. Madjid Tavana & Mariya Sodenkamp & Leena Suhl, 2010. "A soft multi-criteria decision analysis model with application to the European Union enlargement," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 393-421, December.
    18. Lim, Chulmin & Rowsell, Joe & Kim, Seongcheol, 2023. "Exploring the killer domains to create new value: A Comparative case study of Canadian and Korean telcos," 32nd European Regional ITS Conference, Madrid 2023: Realising the digital decade in the European Union – Easier said than done? 277998, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    19. Haddad, Brahim & Liazid, Abdelkrim & Ferreira, Paula, 2017. "A multi-criteria approach to rank renewables for the Algerian electricity system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 462-472.
    20. Rubio-Aliaga, Alvaro & García-Cascales, M. Socorro & Sánchez-Lozano, Juan Miguel & Molina-Garcia, Angel, 2021. "MCDM-based multidimensional approach for selection of optimal groundwater pumping systems: Design and case example," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 213-224.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:13768-:d:1240605. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.