IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i18p13455-d1235480.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimization and Comparative Analysis of Different CCUS Systems in China: The Case of Shanxi Province

Author

Listed:
  • Wenyue Zhou

    (Business School, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Jungong Road 516, Yangpu District, Shanghai 200093, China)

  • Lingying Pan

    (Business School, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Jungong Road 516, Yangpu District, Shanghai 200093, China)

  • Xiaohui Mao

    (Shanghai Future Office Park Development & Operation Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200949, China)

Abstract

As an effective technology to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) technology has been a major strategic choice and has received widespread attention. Meanwhile, the high cost and strict requirements of carbon dioxide storage and utilization on geographical conditions, industrial equipment, and other aspects limit large-scale applications of CCUS. Taking Shanxi Province as an example, in this paper, we study the economic and environmental characteristics of carbon dioxide capture, storage, and utilization under different combinations of technical routes. Steel, power, cement, and chemical industries are considered. Deep saline aquifers and CO 2 -enhanced coalbed methane (CO 2 -ECBM) recovery are selected as the two types of sequestration sinks. Urea production, methanol production, microalgae cultivation, and cement curing are selected as the four potential utilization methods. Then, a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) model is used to optimize the CO 2 utilization pathway based on the principle of least cost, to select the best emission sources, CO 2 pipelines, intermediate transportation nodes, utilization, and storage nodes to achieve reasonable deployment of CCS/CCU projects in Shanxi Province. The results show that CCU with urea production has the lowest cost and is the most economically viable with over 50% reduction in emissions. The second option is CCS which includes CO 2 -ECBM and achieves a 50% reduction in emissions. In addition, there is little difference between the cost of cement-cured CCU and that of methanol-produced CCU. CCU for microalgae cultivation has the highest cost. Therefore, the latter three utilization pathways are currently not economical.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenyue Zhou & Lingying Pan & Xiaohui Mao, 2023. "Optimization and Comparative Analysis of Different CCUS Systems in China: The Case of Shanxi Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-20, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:13455-:d:1235480
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13455/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13455/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. d'Amore, Federico & Mocellin, Paolo & Vianello, Chiara & Maschio, Giuseppe & Bezzo, Fabrizio, 2018. "Economic optimisation of European supply chains for CO2 capture, transport and sequestration, including societal risk analysis and risk mitigation measures," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 401-415.
    2. Cameron Hepburn & Ella Adlen & John Beddington & Emily A. Carter & Sabine Fuss & Niall Mac Dowell & Jan C. Minx & Pete Smith & Charlotte K. Williams, 2019. "The technological and economic prospects for CO2 utilization and removal," Nature, Nature, vol. 575(7781), pages 87-97, November.
    3. Lee, Hwarang & Lee, Jeongeun & Koo, Yoonmo, 2022. "Economic impacts of carbon capture and storage on the steel industry–A hybrid energy system model incorporating technological change," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
    4. Zhang, Shuai & Liu, Linlin & Zhang, Lei & Zhuang, Yu & Du, Jian, 2018. "An optimization model for carbon capture utilization and storage supply chain: A case study in Northeastern China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 194-206.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lu Lu & Haoxuan Chen & Xinxin Qian & Kun Hong & Ming Ye & Mingming Wang & Tong Wu & Chunyuan Zuo, 2025. "Multi-Dimensional Analysis of Carbon Dioxide Sequestration Technologies in China in the Context of Carbon Neutrality: Current Status, Development Potential, and Costs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-30, June.
    2. Weimann, Lukas & Dubbink, Guus & van der Ham, Louis & Gazzani, Matteo, 2023. "A thermodynamic-based mixed-integer linear model of post-combustion carbon capture for reliable use in energy system optimisation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    3. Chen, Siyuan & Liu, Jiangfeng & Zhang, Qi & Teng, Fei & McLellan, Benjamin C., 2022. "A critical review on deployment planning and risk analysis of carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) toward carbon neutrality," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    4. Michael Carus & Lara Dammer & Achim Raschka & Pia Skoczinski, 2020. "Renewable carbon: Key to a sustainable and future‐oriented chemical and plastic industry: Definition, strategy, measures and potential," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 10(3), pages 488-505, June.
    5. Xiang, Yue & Guo, Yongtao & Wu, Gang & Liu, Junyong & Sun, Wei & Lei, Yutian & Zeng, Pingliang, 2022. "Low-carbon economic planning of integrated electricity-gas energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    6. Georgios Varvoutis & Athanasios Lampropoulos & Evridiki Mandela & Michalis Konsolakis & George E. Marnellos, 2022. "Recent Advances on CO 2 Mitigation Technologies: On the Role of Hydrogenation Route via Green H 2," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-38, June.
    7. Wang, Peng-Tao & Wei, Yi-Ming & Yang, Bo & Li, Jia-Quan & Kang, Jia-Ning & Liu, Lan-Cui & Yu, Bi-Ying & Hou, Yun-Bing & Zhang, Xian, 2020. "Carbon capture and storage in China’s power sector: Optimal planning under the 2 °C constraint," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    8. Subrato Acharjya & Jiacheng Chen & Minghui Zhu & Chong Peng, 2021. "Elucidating the reactivity and nature of active sites for tin phthalocyanine during CO2 reduction," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 11(6), pages 1191-1197, December.
    9. Yangbo Ma & Liang Guo & Liang Chang & Weihua Guo & Tao Zhou & Fengkun Hao & Wenda Su & Jingwen Zhou & Guozhi Wang & Mingzheng Shao & Jihan Yu & Jinwen Yin & Yunhao Wang & Fu Liu & An Zhang & Kun Qian , 2025. "Unconventional phase metal heteronanostructures with tunable exposed interface for efficient tandem nitrate electroreduction to ammonia," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-14, December.
    10. Xinyang Gao & Yongjun Jiang & Jiyuan Liu & Guoshuai Shi & Chunlei Yang & Qinshang Xu & Yuanqing Yun & Yuluo Shen & Mingwei Chang & Chenyuan Zhu & Tingyu Lu & Yin Wang & Guanchen Du & Shuzhou Li & Shen, 2024. "Intermediate-regulated dynamic restructuring at Ag-Cu biphasic interface enables selective CO2 electroreduction to C2+ fuels," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    11. Zhang, Shuai & Liu, Linlin & Zhang, Lei & Zhuang, Yu & Du, Jian, 2018. "An optimization model for carbon capture utilization and storage supply chain: A case study in Northeastern China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 194-206.
    12. Chang, Yuan & Gao, Siqi & Ma, Qian & Wei, Ying & Li, Guoping, 2024. "Techno-economic analysis of carbon capture and utilization technologies and implications for China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    13. Abdoli, B. & Hooshmand, F. & MirHassani, S.A., 2023. "A novel stochastic programming model under endogenous uncertainty for the CCS-EOR planning problem," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 338(C).
    14. Rafaty, R. & Dolphin, G. & Pretis, F., 2020. "Carbon pricing and the elasticity of CO2 emissions," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 20116, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    15. Cameron Hepburn & Brian O’Callaghan & Nicholas Stern & Joseph Stiglitz & Dimitri Zenghelis, 2020. "Will COVID-19 fiscal recovery packages accelerate or retard progress on climate change?," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 36(Supplemen), pages 359-381.
    16. Xianjin Shi & Wei Peng & Yu Huang & Chao Gao & Yiman Fu & Zhenyu Wang & Leting Yang & Zixuan Zhu & Junji Cao & Fei Rao & Gangqiang Zhu & Shuncheng Lee & Yujie Xiong, 2024. "Integrable utilization of intermittent sunlight and residual heat for on-demand CO2 conversion with water," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-10, December.
    17. Moreaux, Michel & Amigues, Jean-Pierre & van der Meijden, Gerard & Withagen, Cees, 2024. "Carbon capture: Storage vs. Utilization," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    18. Andrew William Ruttinger & Miyuru Kannangara & Jalil Shadbahr & Phil De Luna & Farid Bensebaa, 2021. "How CO 2 -to-Diesel Technology Could Help Reach Net-Zero Emissions Targets: A Canadian Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-21, October.
    19. Wanyu Shen & Xiaoping Gao & Qichen Liu & Peng Li & Rui Huang & Yi Tan & Zihan Wang & Yilin Zhang & Fan Zhao & Xin Wang & Shiyu Ji & Xusheng Zheng & Yu Zhang & Yuen Wu, 2025. "Self-healing Cu single-atom catalyst for high-performance electrocatalytic CO2 methanation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-12, December.
    20. Clauser, Nicolas & Scown, Corinne D. & Pett-Ridge, Jennifer & Sagues, William Joe, 2025. "A techno-economic assessment of carbon dioxide removal pathways via biochemical conversion of lignocellulose to biofuels and bioplastics," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:13455-:d:1235480. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.