IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i16p12576-d1220338.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accuracy Assessment of WRF Model in the Context of Air Quality Modeling in Complex Terrain

Author

Listed:
  • Mateusz Rzeszutek

    (Department of Environmental Management and Protection, Faculty of Geo-Data Science, Geodesy and Environmental Engineering, AGH University of Science and Technology, Mickiewicza 30 Av., 30-059 Krakow, Poland)

  • Adriana Kłosowska

    (Municipality of Krakow, Climate-Energy-Water Management, Os. Szkolne 27, 31-977 Krakow, Poland)

  • Robert Oleniacz

    (Department of Environmental Management and Protection, Faculty of Geo-Data Science, Geodesy and Environmental Engineering, AGH University of Science and Technology, Mickiewicza 30 Av., 30-059 Krakow, Poland)

Abstract

Output data from the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model are frequently used in air quality modeling for scientific, practical and regulatory purposes. Therefore, it is crucial to determine whether the accuracy of WRF predictions is suitable for application in air quality models on a local scale (<50 km) and in complex terrain. The presented research is unique because, to assess the accuracy of the WRF model, data from experimental data sets for the assessment of air quality models were used, which contained information about the actual conditions of selected meteorological parameters along the vertical profile of the atmosphere. The aim of the study was to conduct an evaluation of the WRF model using data derived from three field experiments designated to conduct air quality model evaluation studies for models such as AERMOD, ADMS or CALPUFF. Accuracy evaluation was carried out in relation to the grid resolution, station location (on-site and weather airport) and vertical profile of the atmosphere. Obtained results of the evaluation for temperature, wind speed and direction were analyzed with regard to the possibilities of application in air quality modeling systems. It was stated that the use of a grid with a resolution of 1 km generally resulted in statistically significantly lower values of errors for wind speed compared to a 4 km resolution. The outcomes of simulations for temperature and wind speed were sensitive with regard to the location. In on-site locations (complex terrain) significantly higher values of prediction errors (MB, MGE, RMSE) were obtained compared to the standard weather station locations (airport). In addition, wind speed predictions in on-site locations were generally biased (overestimated). Along the vertical profile of the atmosphere, up to the altitude of 100 m a.g.l., statistically significantly different outcomes of accuracy evaluation were achieved for wind speed and direction. Considering the above, caution should be exercised when using data from meteorological simulations in air quality modeling.

Suggested Citation

  • Mateusz Rzeszutek & Adriana Kłosowska & Robert Oleniacz, 2023. "Accuracy Assessment of WRF Model in the Context of Air Quality Modeling in Complex Terrain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-27, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:16:p:12576-:d:1220338
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/16/12576/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/16/12576/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carvalho, D. & Rocha, A. & Santos, C. Silva & Pereira, R., 2013. "Wind resource modelling in complex terrain using different mesoscale–microscale coupling techniques," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 493-504.
    2. Prósper, Miguel A. & Otero-Casal, Carlos & Fernández, Felipe Canoura & Miguez-Macho, Gonzalo, 2019. "Wind power forecasting for a real onshore wind farm on complex terrain using WRF high resolution simulations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 674-686.
    3. González-Alonso de Linaje, N. & Mattar, C. & Borvarán, D., 2019. "Quantifying the wind energy potential differences using different WRF initial conditions on Mediterranean coast of Chile," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. González-Alonso de Linaje, N. & Mattar, C. & Borvarán, D., 2019. "Quantifying the wind energy potential differences using different WRF initial conditions on Mediterranean coast of Chile," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    2. Buen Zhang & Shyuan Cheng & Fanghan Lu & Yuan Zheng & Leonardo P. Chamorro, 2020. "Impact of Topographic Steps in the Wake and Power of a Wind Turbine: Part A—Statistics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Jin, Jingxin & Li, Yilin & Ye, Lin & Xu, Xunjian & Lu, Jiazheng, 2023. "Integration of atmospheric stability in wind resource assessment through multi-scale coupling method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
    4. Rober Mamani & Patrick Hendrick, 2022. "Wind Power Potential in Highlands of the Bolivian Andes: A Numerical Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-16, June.
    5. Annas Fauzy & Cheng-Dar Yue & Chien-Cheng Tu & Ta-Hui Lin, 2021. "Understanding the Potential of Wind Farm Exploitation in Tropical Island Countries: A Case for Indonesia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-26, May.
    6. Radünz, William Corrêa & Mattuella, Jussara M. Leite & Petry, Adriane Prisco, 2020. "Wind resource mapping and energy estimation in complex terrain: A framework based on field observations and computational fluid dynamics," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 494-515.
    7. Wang, Yun & Zou, Runmin & Liu, Fang & Zhang, Lingjun & Liu, Qianyi, 2021. "A review of wind speed and wind power forecasting with deep neural networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    8. Alain Ulazia & Ander Nafarrate & Gabriel Ibarra-Berastegi & Jon Sáenz & Sheila Carreno-Madinabeitia, 2019. "The Consequences of Air Density Variations over Northeastern Scotland for Offshore Wind Energy Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-18, July.
    9. Chandel, S.S. & Ramasamy, P. & Murthy, K.S.R, 2014. "Wind power potential assessment of 12 locations in western Himalayan region of India," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 530-545.
    10. Carvalho, D. & Rocha, A. & Gómez-Gesteira, M. & Silva Santos, C., 2017. "Offshore winds and wind energy production estimates derived from ASCAT, OSCAT, numerical weather prediction models and buoys – A comparative study for the Iberian Peninsula Atlantic coast," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(PB), pages 433-444.
    11. Tuy, Soklin & Lee, Han Soo & Chreng, Karodine, 2022. "Integrated assessment of offshore wind power potential using Weather Research and Forecast (WRF) downscaling with Sentinel-1 satellite imagery, optimal sites, annual energy production and equivalent C," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    12. Carvalho, D. & Rocha, A. & Gómez-Gesteira, M. & Silva Santos, C., 2014. "Sensitivity of the WRF model wind simulation and wind energy production estimates to planetary boundary layer parameterizations for onshore and offshore areas in the Iberian Peninsula," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 234-246.
    13. Ulazia, Alain & Saenz, Jon & Ibarra-Berastegui, Gabriel, 2016. "Sensitivity to the use of 3DVAR data assimilation in a mesoscale model for estimating offshore wind energy potential. A case study of the Iberian northern coastline," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 617-627.
    14. William López-Castrillón & Héctor H. Sepúlveda & Cristian Mattar, 2021. "Off-Grid Hybrid Electrical Generation Systems in Remote Communities: Trends and Characteristics in Sustainability Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-29, May.
    15. Li, Jiale & Song, Zihao & Wang, Xuefei & Wang, Yanru & Jia, Yaya, 2022. "A novel offshore wind farm typhoon wind speed prediction model based on PSO–Bi-LSTM improved by VMD," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    16. Li, Jinghua & Zhou, Jiasheng & Chen, Bo, 2020. "Review of wind power scenario generation methods for optimal operation of renewable energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    17. Salvação, Nadia & Bentamy, Abderrahim & Guedes Soares, C., 2022. "Developing a new wind dataset by blending satellite data and WRF model wind predictions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 283-295.
    18. Yuan, Renyu & Ji, Wenju & Luo, Kun & Wang, Jianwen & Zhang, Sanxia & Wang, Qiang & Fan, Jianren & Ni, MingJiang & Cen, Kefa, 2017. "Coupled wind farm parameterization with a mesoscale model for simulations of an onshore wind farm," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 113-125.
    19. D’Isidoro, Massimo & Briganti, Gino & Vitali, Lina & Righini, Gaia & Adani, Mario & Guarnieri, Guido & Moretti, Lorenzo & Raliselo, Muso & Mahahabisa, Mabafokeng & Ciancarella, Luisella & Zanini, Gabr, 2020. "Estimation of solar and wind energy resources over Lesotho and their complementarity by means of WRF yearly simulation at high resolution," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 114-129.
    20. Duarte Jacondino, William & Nascimento, Ana Lucia da Silva & Calvetti, Leonardo & Fisch, Gilberto & Augustus Assis Beneti, Cesar & da Paz, Sheila Radman, 2021. "Hourly day-ahead wind power forecasting at two wind farms in northeast Brazil using WRF model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:16:p:12576-:d:1220338. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.