IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i15p12023-d1211073.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Justice Fosters the Effect of Team-Building Interventions on Viability and Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmet Demir

    (Kanca Forging, Kocaeli 41420, Türkiye)

  • Ercan Ergün

    (Faculty of Business Administration, Gebze Technical University, Kocaeli 41400, Türkiye)

Abstract

Building viable teams provides a sustainable organizational culture and supports efforts to overcome challenges and maintain a long-lasting and growing business. This study analyzed the role of organizational distributive justice on the relationship between team-building interventions and team viability, alongside team performance. As we understand the underlying concepts of viability and performance better, we can build more resilient teams. An empirical study was conducted on a sample of 402 employees in different teams in organizations. A research model was built with viability and performance as the dependent variables and team-building as the independent variable. The perception of distributive justice was the mediator. Team-building was measured by four variables, where the results of the factor analysis suggested that problem-solving and interpersonal relationships converged into one variable, whereas goal-setting and role clarification represented the second factor of team-building. Regression and mediation analysis showed that problem-solving and interpersonal relationships had a stronger influence on teams’ viability and performance. More remarkably, distributive justice mediated this strong relationship. Throughout the challenging business environment, improving the problem-solving abilities of our teams and encouraging them to build strong interpersonal relationships integrated with a perception of justice would improve the teams’ sustainability significantly. Independent of the strength of the relationship between the team-building factors of viability and performance, organizational distributive justice fosters performance and sustainability. The observed influence of distributive justice was stronger on the goal-setting and role clarification components, whereas direct effects were relatively weaker. The high correlation between team viability and performance should encourage leaders to give equal importance to these concepts when building and motivating their teams, measuring the outcomes, and taking necessary actions.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmet Demir & Ercan Ergün, 2023. "Justice Fosters the Effect of Team-Building Interventions on Viability and Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-18, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:12023-:d:1211073
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/12023/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/12023/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tae-Soo Ha & Kuk-Kyoung Moon, 2023. "Distributive Justice, Goal Clarity, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Moderating Role of Transactional and Transformational Leadership," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-20, April.
    2. Yustinus Budi Hermanto & Veronika Agustini Srimulyani, 2022. "The Effects of Organizational Justice on Employee Performance Using Dimension of Organizational Citizenship Behavior as Mediation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-19, October.
    3. Ashok Kumar, 2016. "Book Review: Shuhayl Abidi & Manoj Joshi, The VUCA Company, Mumbai, Jaico Publishing House," Vision, , vol. 20(1), pages 77-77, March.
    4. Tae-Soo Ha & Kuk-Kyoung Moon, 2023. "Organizational Justice and Employee Voluntary Absenteeism in Public Sector Organizations: Disentangling the Moderating Roles of Work Motivation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, May.
    5. Karen A. Jehn & Lindred Greer & Sheen Levine & Gabriel Szulanski, 2008. "The Effects of Conflict Types, Dimensions, and Emergent States on Group Outcomes," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 17(6), pages 465-495, November.
    6. José R. San Cristóbal & Luis Carral & Emma Diaz & José A. Fraguela & Gregorio Iglesias, 2018. "Complexity and Project Management: A General Overview," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-10, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rajesh Savio, 2022. "Between Success and Failure: Integrating Agile Project Management Methods with PRINCE2 Framework for the Enhanced Management of Imperfect Projects," Eximia Journal, Plus Communication Consulting SRL, vol. 5(1), pages 24-32, July.
    2. Hart, Einav & Schweitzer, Maurice E., 2020. "Getting to less: When negotiating harms post-agreement performance," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 155-175.
    3. Jufrizen & Hazmanan Khair & Adek Trisma Dina & Molana Malik Pandia, 2024. "Factor Affecting Workplace Spirituality, Job Satisfaction, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Evidence from Indonesia," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 1, pages 27-48.
    4. González-Varona, José M. & Martín-Cruz, Natalia & Acebes, Fernando & Pajares, Javier, 2023. "How public funding affects complexity in R&D projects. An analysis of team project perceptions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    5. Jaroslav Vrchota & Petr Řehoř & Monika Maříková & Martin Pech, 2020. "Critical Success Factors of the Project Management in Relation to Industry 4.0 for Sustainability of Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    6. Vahtera, Pekka & Buckley, Peter & Aliyev, Murod, 2017. "Affective conflict and identification of knowledge sources in MNE teams," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(5), pages 881-895.
    7. Andrey V. Sidorenkov & Roman V. Pavlenko, 2015. "GROUP PROFILE Computer Technique," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(1), pages 21582440155, January.
    8. Sheikh Raheel Manzoor & Atif Ullah & Rezwan Ullah & Afraseyab Khattak & Heesup Han & Sunghoon Yoo, 2023. "Micro CSR intervention towards employee behavioral and attitudinal outcomes: a parallel mediation model," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, December.
    9. José L. Ballesteros-Rodríguez & Nieves L. Díaz-Díaz & Inmaculada Aguiar-Díaz & Petra De Saá-Pérez, 2020. "The Role of Leadership in the Management of Conflict and Knowledge Sharing in the Research Groups of a Spanish Public University," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 421-436, June.
    10. de Wit, Frank R.C. & Jehn, Karen A. & Scheepers, Daan, 2013. "Task conflict, information processing, and decision-making: The damaging effect of relationship conflict," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 177-189.
    11. Elfi Baillien & Jeroen Camps & Anja Van den Broeck & Jeroen Stouten & Lode Godderis & Maarten Sercu & Hans De Witte, 2016. "An Eye for an Eye Will Make the Whole World Blind: Conflict Escalation into Workplace Bullying and the Role of Distributive Conflict Behavior," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 137(2), pages 415-429, August.
    12. Daniel Soares & Francisco José Gomes da Silva & Sandra Cristina Faria Ramos & Konstantinos Kirytopoulos & José Carlos Sá & Luís Pinto Ferreira, 2022. "Identifying Barriers in the Implementation of Agile Methodologies in Automotive Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-22, May.
    13. Justin J. P. Jansen & Konstantinos C. Kostopoulos & Oli R. Mihalache & Alexandros Papalexandris, 2016. "A Socio-Psychological Perspective on Team Ambidexterity: The Contingency Role of Supportive Leadership Behaviours," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(6), pages 939-965, September.
    14. Kuriakose, Vijay & S, Sreejesh & Jose, Heerah, 2020. "Examining the Mechanisms Linking Work-Related Conflicts and Employee Well-Being: A Mediation Model," American Business Review, Pompea College of Business, University of New Haven, vol. 23(2), pages 260-282, November.
    15. Tahir Hameed & Peter Von Staden & Ki-Seok Kwon, 2018. "Sustainable Economic Growth and the Adaptability of a National System of Innovation: A Socio-Cognitive Explanation for South Korea’s Mired Technology Transfer and Commercialization Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-26, May.
    16. Marques, Francisca & Lourenço, Paulo & Dimas, Isabel & Rebelo, Teresa, 2015. "The Relationship between Types of Conflict, Conflict Handling Strategies and Group Effectiveness," Journal of Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, Cinturs - Research Centre for Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, University of Algarve, vol. 3(1), pages 58-77.
    17. Qianqian Ju & Yankun Sun & Ran Chen, 2023. "An Approach for Measuring Complexity Degree of International Engineering Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-19, June.
    18. P. Pablo Poveda-Orjuela & J. Carlos García-Díaz & Alexander Pulido-Rojano & Germán Cañón-Zabala, 2019. "ISO 50001: 2018 and Its Application in a Comprehensive Management System with an Energy-Performance Focus," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-33, December.
    19. Ayoko, Oluremi B. & Ashkanasy, Neal M. & Li, Yiqiong & Dorris, Alana & Jehn, Karen A., 2023. "An experience sampling study of employees’ reactions to noise in the open-plan office," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(PB).
    20. Paul Benjamin Lowry & Ryan M. Schuetzler & Justin Scott Giboney & Thomas A. Gregory, 2015. "Is Trust Always Better than Distrust? The Potential Value of Distrust in Newer Virtual Teams Engaged in Short-Term Decision-Making," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 723-752, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:12023-:d:1211073. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.