IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i15p11549-d1202920.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring Interacting Effects of Forest Restoration on Wildfire Risk, Hydropower, and Environmental Flows

Author

Listed:
  • Benjamin P. Bryant

    (Independent Consultant, Mount Vernon, WA 98274, USA)

  • Tessa Maurer

    (Blue Forest Conservation, Sacramento, CA 95822, USA)

  • Philip C. Saksa

    (Blue Forest Conservation, Sacramento, CA 95822, USA)

  • Jonathan D. Herman

    (Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA)

  • Kristen N. Wilson

    (The Nature Conservancy, Sacramento, CA 95811, USA)

  • Edward Smith

    (The Nature Conservancy, Sacramento, CA 95811, USA)

Abstract

Forest fires in the western U.S. are increasing in size and intensity, partly due to overstocked forests, a legacy of fire exclusion. Forest restoration can mitigate fire severity and improve ecological health, but funding poses challenges to meaningfully scaling restoration efforts. Co-benefits of restoration can expand the funding options for forest management. In particular, streamflow enhancement may justify financial participation from water and hydroelectric utilities and environmental organizations. However, most efforts to estimate the value of this benefit do not account for interacting effects of restoration, fire, and operational constraints, including environmental flows. To address this, we coupled multiple models using generalizable techniques in order to quantify the impact of restoration on fire behavior, water yield, and hydropower generation in a California reservoir system subject to real-world constraints. The modeled results show water yield benefits from treatment alone, with greater benefits accruing with a return of low-intensity fire. Average annual runoff with treatment increases by 1.67 to 1.95 thousand acre-feet (1.5 to 1.8%) depending on the fire scenario, creating up to 2880 MWh and USD 115,000 of annual generation and revenue. These modest but non-negligible impacts could account for 8.2–15.8% of restoration costs, supporting the co-benefits model to drive investment in forest management.

Suggested Citation

  • Benjamin P. Bryant & Tessa Maurer & Philip C. Saksa & Jonathan D. Herman & Kristen N. Wilson & Edward Smith, 2023. "Exploring Interacting Effects of Forest Restoration on Wildfire Risk, Hydropower, and Environmental Flows," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-22, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:11549-:d:1202920
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/11549/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/11549/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nasirzadehdizaji, Rouhollah & Akyuz, Dilek Eren, 2022. "Predicting the potential impact of forest fires on runoff and sediment loads using a distributed hydrological modeling approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 468(C).
    2. Jones, Kelly W. & Gannon, Benjamin & Timberlake, Thomas & Chamberlain, James L. & Wolk, Brett, 2022. "Societal benefits from wildfire mitigation activities through payments for watershed services: Insights from Colorado," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    3. Prestemon, Jeffrey P. & Abt, Karen L. & Barbour, R. James, 2012. "Quantifying the net economic benefits of mechanical wildfire hazard treatments on timberlands of the western United States," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 44-53.
    4. Keane, Robert E. & Karau, Eva, 2010. "Evaluating the ecological benefits of wildfire by integrating fire and ecosystem simulation models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(8), pages 1162-1172.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Crandall, Mindy S. & Adams, Darius M. & Montgomery, Claire A. & Smith, David, 2017. "The potential rural development impacts of utilizing non-merchantable forest biomass," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 20-29.
    2. Joe Scott & Don Helmbrecht & Matthew Thompson & David Calkin & Kate Marcille, 2012. "Probabilistic assessment of wildfire hazard and municipal watershed exposure," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 64(1), pages 707-728, October.
    3. Isabel Mendes, 2018. "Social risks of forest fires: a methodological proposal for their monetary evaluation," Working Papers Department of Economics 2018/02, ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics and Management, Department of Economics, Universidade de Lisboa.
    4. Montagné-Huck, Claire & Brunette, Marielle, 2018. "Economic analysis of natural forest disturbances: A century of research," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 42-71.
    5. Polash Banerjee, 2022. "MODIS-FIRMS and ground-truthing-based wildfire likelihood mapping of Sikkim Himalaya using machine learning algorithms," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 110(2), pages 899-935, January.
    6. Wibbenmeyer, Matthew & Joiner, Emily & Wear, David N., 2023. "The Economics of Forest Fuel Removals on Federal Lands," RFF Working Paper Series 23-27, Resources for the Future.
    7. Diendéré, Achille Augustin & Kaboré, Dominique, 2023. "Preferences for a payment for ecosystem services program to control forest fires in Burkina Faso: A choice experiment," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    8. Christopher Khawand, 2015. "Air Quality, Mortality, and Perinatal Health: Causal Evidence from Wildfires," 2015 Papers pkh318, Job Market Papers.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:11549-:d:1202920. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.