IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i14p11357-d1199274.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Morphodiversity as a Tool in Geoconservation: A Case Study in a Mountain Area (Pieniny Mts, Poland)

Author

Listed:
  • Tomasz Bartuś

    (Department of General Geology and Geotourism, Faculty of Geology, Geophysics and Environmental Protection, AGH University in Krakow, Al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Kraków, Poland)

  • Wojciech Mastej

    (Department of General Geology and Geotourism, Faculty of Geology, Geophysics and Environmental Protection, AGH University in Krakow, Al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Kraków, Poland)

Abstract

Verification and delimitation of existing and new surface forms of nature conservation require objective tools that elevate the significance of the conducted evaluations. If our main goal is to preserve biodiversity, it can be ensured through challenging-to-implement practices of human neutrality towards the environment or activities promoting sustainable development that consider the provision of diverse abiotic habitat conditions. For mountainous areas, where the species diversity of plants and animals is strongly linked to the terrain morphology, an analysis of morphodiversity can provide valuable insights. This study examines the morphodiversity of the Pieniny Mts region (southern Poland) in fundamental fields using three mathematical models and various morphometric indicators. The evaluation of existing conservation forms and proposed changes in the analysis were dependent not solely on morphodiversity but also on its autocorrelation. Hot Spot Analysis and Local Indicator of Spatial Association methods were employed, investigating the intensity of spatial clustering of areas with low and high morphodiversity values. Areas with high morphodiversity clustering were defined as justifying legal protection, while those belonging to clusters of fields with low parameter values were considered not to require conservation. Additional insights were gained through the analysis of hot and cold spots, representing fields with high or low morphodiversity surrounded by clusters of fields with contrasting values. The conducted research allowed for the proposing of significant spatial changes for the Pieniny National Park and its adjacent areas to ensure the preservation of high morphodiversity and, consequently, biodiversity.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomasz Bartuś & Wojciech Mastej, 2023. "Morphodiversity as a Tool in Geoconservation: A Case Study in a Mountain Area (Pieniny Mts, Poland)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-27, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:11357-:d:1199274
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/11357/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/11357/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eva Pescatore & Mario Bentivenga & Salvatore Ivo Giano, 2023. "Geoheritage and Geoconservation: Some Remarks and Considerations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-22, March.
    2. Kevin J. Gaston, 2000. "Global patterns in biodiversity," Nature, Nature, vol. 405(6783), pages 220-227, May.
    3. Catarina Lopes & Zara Teixeira & Diamantino I. Pereira & Paulo Pereira, 2023. "Identifying Optimal Cell Size for Geodiversity Quantitative Assessment with Richness, Diversity and Evenness Indices," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-26, May.
    4. Andrea Ferrando & Francesco Faccini & Guido Paliaga & Paola Coratza, 2021. "A Quantitative GIS and AHP Based Analysis for Geodiversity Assessment and Mapping," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-18, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bernard W T Coetzee & Kevin J Gaston & Steven L Chown, 2014. "Local Scale Comparisons of Biodiversity as a Test for Global Protected Area Ecological Performance: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(8), pages 1-11, August.
    2. Emiliya Hamidova & Alberto Bosino & Laura Franceschi & Mattia De Amicis, 2024. "Nature-Based Solution Integration to Enhance Urban Geomorphological Mapping: A Methodological Approach," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-26, April.
    3. Poonam Tripathi & Mukund Dev Behera & Partha Sarathi Roy, 2017. "Optimized grid representation of plant species richness in India—Utility of an existing national database in integrated ecological analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-13, March.
    4. Zhenhua Luo & Songhua Tang & Chunwang Li & Jing Chen & Hongxia Fang & Zhigang Jiang, 2011. "Do Rapoport's Rule, Mid-Domain Effect or Environmental Factors Predict Latitudinal Range Size Patterns of Terrestrial Mammals in China?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(11), pages 1-9, November.
    5. Simona-Roxana Ulman & Costica Mihai & Cristina Cautisanu, 2020. "Peculiarities of the Relation between Human and Environmental Wellbeing in Different Stages of National Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-26, October.
    6. Mellin, C. & Ferraris, J. & Galzin, R. & Harmelin-Vivien, M. & Kulbicki, M. & de Loma, T. Lison, 2008. "Natural and anthropogenic influences on the diversity structure of reef fish communities in the Tuamotu Archipelago (French Polynesia)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 218(1), pages 182-187.
    7. Krausmann, Fridolin & Erb, Karl-Heinz & Gingrich, Simone & Lauk, Christian & Haberl, Helmut, 2008. "Global patterns of socioeconomic biomass flows in the year 2000: A comprehensive assessment of supply, consumption and constraints," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 471-487, April.
    8. Irene Petrosillo & Donatella Valente & Christian Mulder & Bai-Lian Li & K. Bruce Jones & Giovanni Zurlini, 2021. "The Resilient Recurrent Behavior of Mediterranean Semi-Arid Complex Adaptive Landscapes," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    9. Mayer, Andreas & Kaufmann, Lisa & Kalt, Gerald & Matej, Sarah & Theurl, Michaela C. & Morais, Tiago G. & Leip, Adrian & Erb, Karl-Heinz, 2021. "Applying the Human Appropriation of Net Primary Production framework to map provisioning ecosystem services and their relation to ecosystem functioning across the European Union," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    10. Katherine Velghe & Irene Gregory-Eaves, 2013. "Body Size Is a Significant Predictor of Congruency in Species Richness Patterns: A Meta-Analysis of Aquatic Studies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(2), pages 1-6, February.
    11. Paolo Oppizzi & Federico Pasquaré Mariotto & Rudolf Stockar & Andrea Stella & Noemi Corti & Martina Pedicini & Sergio Andò & Giovanni Vezzoli & Fabio Luca Bonali, 2023. "Geosites in the Gole della Breggia Geopark, Ticino, Southern Switzerland," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-13, October.
    12. Mario Bentivenga & Eva Pescatore & Marco Piccarreta & Fabrizio Terenzio Gizzi & Nicola Masini & Salvatore Ivo Giano, 2024. "Geoheritage and Geoconservation, from Theory to Practice: The Ghost Town of Craco (Matera District, Basilicata Region, Southern Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-39, March.
    13. Odoligie Imarhiagbe & Wisdom Oghenevwogaga Egboduku, 2019. "Conservation and Utilization of Biodiversity- Implications to the Nigerian Environment," JOJ Wildlife & Biodiversity, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 1(4), pages 93-102, October.
    14. Paweł Wolniewicz, 2023. "Quantifying Geodiversity at the Continental Scale: Limitations and Prospects," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-28, May.
    15. O'Neill, Daniel W. & Abson, David J., 2009. "To settle or protect? A global analysis of net primary production in parks and urban areas," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 319-327, December.
    16. Yuantan Zhong & Aleksandr Ivanovskii & Jean Claude Ndayishimiye & Andrey N. Tsyganov & Kirill Babeshko & Damir Saldaev & Yuri Mazei, 2022. "Distribution of Soil Microbes in Urban Parks: An Effect of Under-Tree Crown and Hillside Position on Testate Amoeba Assemblages in Subtropics (Shenzhen, China)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-17, December.
    17. Erb, Karl-Heinz & Krausmann, Fridolin & Gaube, Veronika & Gingrich, Simone & Bondeau, Alberte & Fischer-Kowalski, Marina & Haberl, Helmut, 2009. "Analyzing the global human appropriation of net primary production -- processes, trajectories, implications. An introduction," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 250-259, December.
    18. Denis Réale & Mahdi Khelfaoui & Pierre-Olivier Montiglio & Yves Gingras, 2020. "Mapping the dynamics of research networks in ecology and evolution using co-citation analysis (1975–2014)," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(3), pages 1361-1385, March.
    19. Rafael A. Moral & John Hinde & Clarice G. B. Demétrio & Carolina Reigada & Wesley A. C. Godoy, 2018. "Models for Jointly Estimating Abundances of Two Unmarked Site-Associated Species Subject to Imperfect Detection," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 23(1), pages 20-38, March.
    20. Zhao, Fang & Xu, Yi & Ma, Wanying, 2023. "Geodiversity and natural resource management: The importance of combustible renewables and waste in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:11357-:d:1199274. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.