IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jresou/v12y2023i10p122-d1258097.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Geosites in the Gole della Breggia Geopark, Ticino, Southern Switzerland

Author

Listed:
  • Paolo Oppizzi

    (Geolog.ch SA, 6872 Mendrisio, Switzerland)

  • Federico Pasquaré Mariotto

    (Department of Human and Innovation Sciences, Insubria University, 21100 Como, Italy)

  • Rudolf Stockar

    (Cantonal Museum of Natural History, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland)

  • Andrea Stella

    (Gole della Breggia Geopark, 6834 Morbio Inferiore, Switzerland)

  • Noemi Corti

    (Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy)

  • Martina Pedicini

    (Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy)

  • Sergio Andò

    (Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy)

  • Giovanni Vezzoli

    (Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy)

  • Fabio Luca Bonali

    (Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy
    CRUST-Interuniversity Center for 3D Seismotectonics with Territorial Applications, 66100 Chieti Scalo, Italy)

Abstract

This work is aimed at illustrating one of the most engaging geoparks in Europe, the Gole della Breggia Geopark. By following its geotrail, the visitors can observe a great deal of features that encompass a wide variety of sedimentary, stratigraphic, tectonic and paleogeographic processes. Its contents are popularized by a comprehensive geotrail that encompasses 23 geostops, enriched with explanatory panels, which enable viewers to gain an overall picture of the complex processes that led to the present-day configuration of the outcrops encountered in the geopark. We have selected five significative outcrops, which we have regarded as fully-fledged geosites, and which encompass the whole 170-million-year interval, from Early Jurassic to Late Miocene times, during which the rocks of the geopark were deposited and deformed. We have performed an assessment of the five geosites, using the most common criteria that can be applied for geosite evaluation. The results of the assessment show that the most valuable geosites are the Lombardian Maiolica, and the Limestone with Pelagic Bivalves. All five geosites, thanks to a QR code added to each figure along the text, can be viewed as virtual geosites (VGs), integrated by 360° videos.

Suggested Citation

  • Paolo Oppizzi & Federico Pasquaré Mariotto & Rudolf Stockar & Andrea Stella & Noemi Corti & Martina Pedicini & Sergio Andò & Giovanni Vezzoli & Fabio Luca Bonali, 2023. "Geosites in the Gole della Breggia Geopark, Ticino, Southern Switzerland," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-13, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:12:y:2023:i:10:p:122-:d:1258097
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/12/10/122/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/12/10/122/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eva Pescatore & Mario Bentivenga & Salvatore Ivo Giano, 2023. "Geoheritage and Geoconservation: Some Remarks and Considerations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-22, March.
    2. Chiara Frassi & Alessia Amorfini & Antonio Bartelletti & Giuseppe Ottria, 2022. "Popularizing Structural Geology: Exemplary Structural Geosites from the Apuan Alps UNESCO Global Geopark (Northern Apennines, Italy)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, August.
    3. Luigi Perotti & Irene Maria Bollati & Cristina Viani & Enrico Zanoletti & Valeria Caironi & Manuela Pelfini & Marco Giardino, 2020. "Fieldtrips and Virtual Tours as Geotourism Resources: Examples from the Sesia Val Grande UNESCO Global Geopark (NW Italy)," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-35, May.
    4. Kejian Xu & Wenhui Wu, 2022. "Geoparks and Geotourism in China: A Sustainable Approach to Geoheritage Conservation and Local Development—A Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Esperanza Fernández-Martínez & Ismael Coronado & Luna Adrados & Rodrigo Castaño, 2022. "Factors in the Responsible Management of the Luna Valley Complex Geosite (NW Spain)—A Case Study," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-31, November.
    2. Nicoletta Santangelo & Ettore Valente, 2020. "Geoheritage and Geotourism Resources," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-5, June.
    3. Antonio Martínez-Graña & José Angel González-Delgado & Carlos Nieto & Vanessa Villalba & Teresa Cabero, 2023. "Geodiversity and Geoheritage to Promote Geotourism Using Augmented Reality and 3D Virtual Flights in the Arosa Estuary (NW Spain)," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-19, May.
    4. Federico Pasquaré Mariotto & Kyriaki Drymoni & Fabio L. Bonali & Alessandro Tibaldi & Noemi Corti & Paolo Oppizzi, 2023. "Geosite Assessment and Communication: A Review," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, February.
    5. Yiting Zhu & Xueru Pang & Chunshan Zhou, 2023. "Key Area Recognition and Evaluation of Audio-Visual Landscape for Global Geoparks: A Case Study of Koktokay in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-21, September.
    6. Miriam Edith Pérez-Romero & José Álvarez-García & Martha Beatriz Flores-Romero & Donaji Jiménez-Islas, 2023. "UNESCO Global Geoparks 22 Years after Their Creation: Analysis of Scientific Production," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, March.
    7. Junxiong Mo & Piling Sun & Dandan Shen & Nan Li & Jinye Zhang & Kun Wang, 2023. "Simulation Analysis of Land-Use Spatial Conflict in a Geopark Based on the GMOP–Markov–PLUS Model: A Case Study of Yimengshan Geopark, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-24, June.
    8. Daminda Sumanapala & Isabelle D. Wolf, 2022. "Introducing Geotourism to Diversify the Visitor Experience in Protected Areas and Reduce Impacts on Overused Attractions," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-15, November.
    9. Anna V. Mikhailenko & Svetlana O. Zorina & Natalia N. Yashalova & Dmitry A. Ruban, 2023. "Promoting Geosites on Web-Pages: An Assessment of the Quality and Quantity of Information in Real Cases," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-17, May.
    10. Tomasz Bartuś & Wojciech Mastej, 2023. "Morphodiversity as a Tool in Geoconservation: A Case Study in a Mountain Area (Pieniny Mts, Poland)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-27, July.
    11. Antonella Senese & Manuela Pelfini & Davide Maragno & Irene Maria Bollati & Davide Fugazza & Luca Vaghi & Maurizio Federici & Luca Grimaldi & Piera Belotti & Paola Lauri & Carla Ferliga & Leonardo La , 2023. "The Role of E-Bike in Discovering Geodiversity and Geoheritage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-14, March.
    12. Marko D. Petrović & Dobrila Lukić & Milan M. Radovanović & Ivana Blešić & Tamara Gajić & Dunja Demirović Bajrami & Julia A. Syromiatnikova & Đurđa Miljković & Sanja Kovačić & Marija Kostić, 2023. "How Can Tufa Deposits Contribute to the Geotourism Offer? The Outcomes from the First UNESCO Global Geopark in Serbia," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, January.
    13. Igor Trišić & Donatella Privitera & Snežana Štetić & Georgi Genov & Sara Stanić Jovanović, 2022. "Sustainable Tourism in Protected Area—A Case of Fruška Gora National Park, Vojvodina (Northern Serbia)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-13, November.
    14. Zhao, Fang & Xu, Yi & Ma, Wanying, 2023. "Geodiversity and natural resource management: The importance of combustible renewables and waste in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:12:y:2023:i:10:p:122-:d:1258097. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.