IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i14p11212-d1196961.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analyzing Interrelationships and Prioritizing Performance Indicators in Global Product Development: Application in the Chinese Renewable Energy Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Razika Malek

    (School of Economics and Management, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Qing Yang

    (School of Economics and Management, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

Today’s global business landscape and intense market competition have heightened the significance of global product development (GPD) practices, making it necessary for organizations to evaluate GPD projects for sustained success. Existing research has primarily focused on independent and tangible performance metrics, neglecting their interdependencies and intangible nature in real-world scenarios. To address this gap, this study seeks to enhance the understanding of GPD performance by establishing a more sophisticated assessment approach. A hybrid decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) and analytical network process (ANP) method, known as DANP, was employed to determine the importance of evaluation metrics and their relationships. This research stands out by integrating financial, quality, time, environmental, and capability dimensions, along with their respective indicators, and presenting their interrelationships and priority weights for evaluating GPD projects. The proposed framework was validated through an in-depth case investigation conducted with a Chinese sustainable energy solutions company, involving extensive discussions with decision-makers. The results indicate that technological, innovation, and environmental indicators are the most critical metrics. The influential network relation map (INRM) derived from these findings offers practical recommendations to enhance GPD project performance, catering to policymakers and researchers in both managerial and theoretical contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Razika Malek & Qing Yang, 2023. "Analyzing Interrelationships and Prioritizing Performance Indicators in Global Product Development: Application in the Chinese Renewable Energy Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-26, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:11212-:d:1196961
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/11212/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/11212/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anant Mishra & Kingshuk K. Sinha, 2016. "Work Design and Integration Glitches in Globally Distributed Technology Projects," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 25(2), pages 347-369, February.
    2. Lei Wang & Mengke Yang & Zulfiqar Hussain Pathan & Shafaq Salam & Khuram Shahzad & Jianqiu Zeng, 2018. "Analysis of Influencing Factors of Big Data Adoption in Chinese Enterprises Using DANP Technique," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-16, October.
    3. Rainer Silbernagel & Tobias Arndt & Sina Peukert & Gisela Lanza, 2021. "Process Quality Improvements in Global Production Networks," Management for Professionals, in: Thomas Friedli & Gisela Lanza & Dominik Remling (ed.), Global Manufacturing Management, chapter 12, pages 167-177, Springer.
    4. Indranil Bardhan & Vish V. Krishnan & Shu Lin, 2013. "Team Dispersion, Information Technology, and Project Performance," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 22(6), pages 1478-1493, November.
    5. Ivo Hristov & Antonio Chirico, 2019. "The Role of Sustainability Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) in Implementing Sustainable Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-19, October.
    6. Govindan, Kannan & Madan Shankar, K. & Kannan, Devika, 2016. "Sustainable material selection for construction industry – A hybrid multi criteria decision making approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 1274-1288.
    7. Bastian Verhaelen & Sina Peukert & Gisela Lanza, 2021. "Site Selection Processes in Global Production Networks," Management for Professionals, in: Thomas Friedli & Gisela Lanza & Dominik Remling (ed.), Global Manufacturing Management, chapter 7, pages 101-115, Springer.
    8. Nikola Kadoić & Blaženka Divjak & Nina Begičević Ređep, 2019. "Integrating the DEMATEL with the analytic network process for effective decision-making," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 27(3), pages 653-678, September.
    9. Sheng-Li Si & Xiao-Yue You & Hu-Chen Liu & Ping Zhang, 2018. "DEMATEL Technique: A Systematic Review of the State-of-the-Art Literature on Methodologies and Applications," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-33, January.
    10. Govindan, Kannan & Shankar, Madan & Kannan, Devika, 2018. "Supplier selection based on corporate social responsibility practices," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 353-379.
    11. Changlu Zhang & Liqian Tang & Jian Zhang, 2023. "Identifying Critical Indicators in Performance Evaluation of Green Supply Chains Using Hybrid Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-20, March.
    12. Johansson, Malin & Olhager, Jan, 2018. "Comparing offshoring and backshoring: The role of manufacturing site location factors and their impact on post-relocation performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 37-46.
    13. Larsen, Marcus M., 2016. "Failing to estimate the costs of offshoring: A study on process performance," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 307-318.
    14. Federico Sbernini & Nicola Granini & Zaza Nadja Lee Herbert-Hansen & Waqas Khalid, 2018. "Contextual factors influencing the success of global product development," International Journal of Product Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 22(6), pages 464-487.
    15. Anshuman Tripathy & Steven D. Eppinger, 2013. "Structuring Work Distribution for Global Product Development Organizations," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 22(6), pages 1557-1575, November.
    16. Changchun Li & Sen Wang, 2022. "Digital Optimization, Green R&D Collaboration, and Green Technological Innovation in Manufacturing Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-20, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fabrizio Salvador & Juan Pablo Madiedo, 2021. "Enabling Globally Distributed Projects: Effects of Project Interface Match and Related Technical Experience," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(4), pages 1052-1081, April.
    2. Ravi Bapna & Alok Gupta & Gautam Ray & Shweta Singh, 2023. "Single-Sourcing vs. Multisourcing: An Empirical Analysis of Large Information Technology Outsourcing Arrangements," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 1109-1130, September.
    3. Mohsen Jafari Songhori & Madjid Tavana & Takao Terano, 2020. "Product development team formation: effects of organizational- and product-related factors," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 88-122, March.
    4. Diogo Rodrigues & Radu Godina & Pedro Espadinha da Cruz, 2021. "Key Performance Indicators Selection through an Analytic Network Process Model for Tooling and Die Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-20, December.
    5. Davor Maček & Ivan Magdalenić & Nina Begičević Ređep, 2021. "A Model for the Evaluation of Critical IT Systems Using Multicriteria Decision-Making with Elements for Risk Assessment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-24, May.
    6. Schmidt, Christoph G. & Wuttke, David A. & Heese, H. Sebastian & Wagner, Stephan M., 2023. "Antecedents of public reactions to supply chain glitches," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    7. Priom Mahmud & Sanjoy Kumar Paul & Abdullahil Azeem & Priyabrata Chowdhury, 2021. "Evaluating Supply Chain Collaboration Barriers in Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-28, July.
    8. Lin, Sheng-Hau & Zhao, Xiaofeng & Wu, Jiuxing & Liang, Fachao & Li, Jia-Hsuan & Lai, Ren-Ji & Hsieh, Jing-Chzi & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2021. "An evaluation framework for developing green infrastructure by using a new hybrid multiple attribute decision-making model for promoting environmental sustainability," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    9. Fabian Kreutzer & Wolfram Berger, 2022. "Does offshoring boost productivity? A comparison of SMEs and large firms for Germany," Economics and Business Letters, Oviedo University Press, vol. 11(2), pages 46-52.
    10. Changping Zhao & Juanjuan Sun & Yun Zhang, 2022. "A Study of the Drivers of Decarbonization in the Plastics Supply Chain in the Post-COVID-19 Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-20, November.
    11. Hossein Yousefi & Saheb Ghanbari Motlagh & Mohammad Montazeri, 2022. "Multi-Criteria Decision-Making System for Wind Farm Site-Selection Using Geographic Information System (GIS): Case Study of Semnan Province, Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-27, June.
    12. Pablo Aragonés‐Beltrán & Mª. Carmen González‐Cruz & Astrid León‐Camargo & Rosario Viñoles‐Cebolla, 2023. "Assessment of regional development needs according to criteria based on the Sustainable Development Goals in the Meta Region (Colombia)," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 1101-1121, April.
    13. Isabel-María García-Sánchez & Cristina Aibar-Guzmán & Carmen Serrano-Valdecillos & Beatriz Aibar-Guzmán, 2022. "Analysis of the Dialogue with Stakeholders by the IBEX 35 Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-26, February.
    14. Domenica Lavorato & Palmira Piedepalumbo, 2023. "How Smart Technologies Affect the Decision-Making and Control System of Food and Beverage Companies—A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-21, February.
    15. Mahmood Safaei & Elankovan A. Sundararajan & Shahla Asadi & Mehrbakhsh Nilashi & Mohd Juzaiddin Ab Aziz & M. S. Saravanan & Maha Abdelhaq & Raed Alsaqour, 2022. "A Hybrid MCDM Approach Based on Fuzzy-Logic and DEMATEL to Evaluate Adult Obesity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-21, November.
    16. Alberto de la Calle & Inmaculada Freije & Aitor Oyarbide, 2021. "Digital Product–Service Innovation and Sustainability: A Multiple-Case Study in the Capital Goods Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-29, June.
    17. Xin Huang & Xianling Jiang & Wei Liu & Qian Chen, 2021. "Business Group-Affiliation and Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from Listed Companies in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-21, February.
    18. Wang, Qun & Jia, Guozhu & Song, Wenyan, 2022. "Identifying critical factors in systems with interrelated components: A method considering heterogeneous influence and strength attenuation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(1), pages 456-470.
    19. Lin, Sheng-Hau & Huang, Xianjin & Fu, Guole & Chen, Jia-Tsong & Zhao, Xiaofeng & Li, Jia-Hsuan & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2021. "Evaluating the sustainability of urban renewal projects based on a model of hybrid multiple-attribute decision-making," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    20. A. G. Olabi & Khaled Obaideen & Mohammad Ali Abdelkareem & Maryam Nooman AlMallahi & Nabila Shehata & Abdul Hai Alami & Ayman Mdallal & Asma Ali Murah Hassan & Enas Taha Sayed, 2023. "Wind Energy Contribution to the Sustainable Development Goals: Case Study on London Array," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-22, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:11212-:d:1196961. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.