IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i13p9876-d1176051.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measurement and Promotion Strategy of China’s Power System Regulation Capacity

Author

Listed:
  • Zhengyuan Zhai

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Lei Zhang

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Xiaochao Hou

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

Abstract

Power system regulation capacity is the key factor affecting the development and consumption of renewable energy. Based on China’s policy to promote the consumption of renewable energy, this paper constructs an evaluation index system of power system regulation capability covering four dimensions: the supply side, grid side, load side, and support system. The entropy method is used to measure the power system regulation capability of 30 provinces during the 13th Five-Year Plan period. The results showed: (1) The national average power system regulation capacity index is 0.18, and only less than one-third of provinces scored higher than the average. (2) The contribution of each dimension is significantly different, and the supply side regulation capability was the highest (0.315). The regulation capability of the eastern region is stronger than that of the central region and the western region. From the perspective of subdivided fields, this study focuses on exploring five areas of power system regulation capacity construction, including electric vehicle energy storage, thermal power flexibility, regional power grid regulation, electric vehicle market, and grid construction, to tap greater development potential.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhengyuan Zhai & Lei Zhang & Xiaochao Hou, 2023. "Measurement and Promotion Strategy of China’s Power System Regulation Capacity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-22, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:9876-:d:1176051
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/9876/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/9876/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. He, Yongxiu & Pang, Yuexia & Zhang, Qi & Jiao, Zhe & Chen, Qian, 2018. "Comprehensive evaluation of regional clean energy development levels based on principal component analysis and rough set theory," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 643-653.
    2. Ajit Kumar Verma & Ajit Srividya & Durga Rao Karanki, 2010. "Reliability and Safety Engineering," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, Springer, number 978-1-84996-232-2, December.
    3. Held, Tobias & Gerrits, Lasse, 2019. "On the road to electrification – A qualitative comparative analysis of urban e-mobility policies in 15 European cities," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 12-23.
    4. Yanmei Li & Zeng Chen, 2018. "Evaluation Index System and Evaluation Method of China’s Regional Potential for Electrical Energy Substitution," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-16, July.
    5. Ioannidis, Alexis & Chalvatzis, Konstantinos J. & Li, Xin & Notton, Gilles & Stephanides, Phedeas, 2019. "The case for islands’ energy vulnerability: Electricity supply diversity in 44 global islands," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 440-452.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marek Stawowy & Adam Rosiński & Mirosław Siergiejczyk & Krzysztof Perlicki, 2021. "Quality and Reliability-Exploitation Modeling of Power Supply Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-16, May.
    2. Panagiotis G. Kosmopoulos & Marios T. Mechilis & Panagiota Kaoura, 2022. "Solar Energy Production Planning in Antikythera: Adequacy Scenarios and the Effect of the Atmospheric Parameters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Marek Stawowy & Adam Rosiński & Jacek Paś & Stanisław Duer & Marta Harničárová & Krzysztof Perlicki, 2023. "The Reliability and Exploitation Analysis Method of the ICT System Power Supply with the Use of Modelling Based on Rough Sets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-18, June.
    4. Vivoda, Vlado, 2022. "LNG export diversification and demand security: A comparative study of major exporters," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    5. Wang, Zhenya & Yao, Ligang & Cai, Yongwu & Zhang, Jun, 2020. "Mahalanobis semi-supervised mapping and beetle antennae search based support vector machine for wind turbine rolling bearings fault diagnosis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 1312-1327.
    6. Liu, Yang & Dong, Kangyin & Jiang, Qingzhe, 2023. "Assessing energy vulnerability and its impact on carbon emissions: A global case," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    7. Rongqiu Song & Dimitris Potoglou, 2020. "Are Existing Battery Electric Vehicles Adoption Studies Able to Inform Policy? A Review for Policymakers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-20, August.
    8. Bolbot, Victor & Trivyza, Nikoletta L. & Theotokatos, Gerasimos & Boulougouris, Evangelos & Rentizelas, Athanasios & Vassalos, Dracos, 2020. "Cruise ships power plant optimisation and comparative analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    9. Cristina Johansson & Johan Ölvander & Micael Derelöv, 2018. "Multi-objective optimization for safety and reliability trade-off: Optimization and results processing," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 232(6), pages 661-676, December.
    10. Nikolas Schöne & Kathrin Greilmeier & Boris Heinz, 2022. "Survey-Based Assessment of the Preferences in Residential Demand Response on the Island of Mayotte," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-30, February.
    11. Guido Ala & Gabriella Di Filippo & Fabio Viola & Graziella Giglia & Antonino Imburgia & Pietro Romano & Vincenzo Castiglia & Filippo Pellitteri & Giuseppe Schettino & Rosario Miceli, 2020. "Different Scenarios of Electric Mobility: Current Situation and Possible Future Developments of Fuel Cell Vehicles in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-22, January.
    12. Silvia Tomasi & Alyona Zubaryeva & Cesare Pizzirani & Margherita Dal Col & Jessica Balest, 2021. "Propensity to Choose Electric Vehicles in Cross-Border Alpine Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-20, April.
    13. Zhao, Lu-Tao & Liu, Zhao-Ting & Cheng, Lei, 2021. "How will China's coal industry develop in the future? A quantitative analysis with policy implications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    14. Praene, Jean Philippe & Fakra, Damien Ali Hamada & Benard, Fiona & Ayagapin, Leslie & Rachadi, Mohamed Nasroudine Mohamed, 2021. "Comoros’s energy review for promoting renewable energy sources," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 885-893.
    15. Santanu Kumar Dash & Suprava Chakraborty & Michele Roccotelli & Umesh Kumar Sahu, 2022. "Hydrogen Fuel for Future Mobility: Challenges and Future Aspects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-22, July.
    16. Xiaowei Fu & Yanlin Liu & Xi Li, 2020. "Source Diagnosis of Solid Oxide Fuel Cell System Oscillation Based on Data Driven," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-13, August.
    17. Wróbel, Krzysztof & Montewka, Jakub & Kujala, Pentti, 2018. "Towards the development of a system-theoretic model for safety assessment of autonomous merchant vessels," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 209-224.
    18. Wang, Xue & Fan, Li-Wei & Zhang, Hongyan, 2023. "Policies for enhancing patent quality: Evidence from renewable energy technology in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    19. Hannah Mareike Marczinkowski & Poul Alberg Østergaard & Søren Roth Djørup, 2019. "Transitioning Island Energy Systems—Local Conditions, Development Phases, and Renewable Energy Integration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-20, September.
    20. Ritu Chandna & Mangey Ram, 2016. "Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process to a structure under 2-out-of-3:F modeling," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 53(4), pages 693-704, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:9876-:d:1176051. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.